H.R. 6081

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 21st 2008, 5:30 am
  #1  
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 4,913
md95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond repute
Default H.R. 6081

I am surprised that nobody seems to have mentioned H.R. 6081, also known by the much more catchy name of "Heroes Earnings Assistance and Relief Tax Act of 2008".

This bill which, as The Economist mentioned in a recent article, comes with a name almost as veto-proof as "The Patriot Act" seeks "To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide benefits for military personnel, and for other purposes."

One of the "other purposes" is set out in Section 301 which
Sets forth additional rules for the tax treatment of high-income individuals who relinquish U.S. citizenship or residency to avoid U.S. taxation (expatriates). Treats all property of expatriates as sold for fair market value on the day before the expatriation date and includes gain (over $600,000) or loss from such sale in their gross income. Allows expatriates to elect to defer payment of any tax resulting from expatriation if adequate security for payment of such tax is given.
Requires 30% withholding of tax for certain items of deferred compensation payable to expatriates.
Imposes a separate tax on gifts and bequests from expatriates exceeding $10,000, payable by the recipient of such gift or bequest.
Note that, while the Economist article only talks about US citizens, it appears from the abstract that the bill also targets people who have been US residents (presumably using the IRS definition of "resident") when they depart.

This was sufficient to send one of my colleagues, who has been a US permanent resident for just over 10 years, fleeing back to the UK last month and vowing never to set foot in the US again.

It doesn't bother me too much since I have no intention of ever leaving the US, but it does seem that it could be a problem for anyone who comes to the US for an extended period and then decides to leave.

Last edited by md95065; Jun 21st 2008 at 5:35 am.
md95065 is offline  
Old Jun 21st 2008, 7:04 am
  #2  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Steerpike's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 13,111
Steerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: H.R. 6081

"... high-income individuals who relinquish U.S. citizenship or residency to avoid U.S. taxation" - doesn't this suggest that the "intent" of your relinquishment would have to be proven to be tax avoidance? Couldn't you just say, as some of my friends who have moved to Canada recently have said, "I don't want to live in a country run by George Bush and his war-mongering cronies"?
Steerpike is offline  
Old Jun 21st 2008, 8:08 am
  #3  
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 4,913
md95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: H.R. 6081

Unfortunately back in 1996 Congress tacked some provisions onto a Health Reform bill (which became the Health Reform Act of 1996) the purpose of which was "To presume a tax avoidance purpose for certain wealthy or high-income individuals".

So if you fit the profile you have to prove that your purpose was not tax avoidance.
md95065 is offline  
Old Jun 21st 2008, 3:29 pm
  #4  
Powder Maggot
 
AdobePinon's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Location: Nuevo Mexico
Posts: 4,452
AdobePinon has a reputation beyond reputeAdobePinon has a reputation beyond reputeAdobePinon has a reputation beyond reputeAdobePinon has a reputation beyond reputeAdobePinon has a reputation beyond reputeAdobePinon has a reputation beyond reputeAdobePinon has a reputation beyond reputeAdobePinon has a reputation beyond reputeAdobePinon has a reputation beyond reputeAdobePinon has a reputation beyond reputeAdobePinon has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: H.R. 6081

Originally Posted by md95065
Unfortunately back in 1996 Congress tacked some provisions onto a Health Reform bill (which became the Health Reform Act of 1996) the purpose of which was "To presume a tax avoidance purpose for certain wealthy or high-income individuals".

So if you fit the profile you have to prove that your purpose was not tax avoidance.
Yep, you'll find it all in your friendly Pub 519, Tax Guide for Aliens, which should be residing on the coffee table of any self-respecting British expat.
AdobePinon is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.