Form 2555
#1
Just Joined
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5
Form 2555
Hi
My husband (who is British and became a PR of the US in October 2011) is filing his taxes for the first time. We have a quick question: does he need to fill in the 2555 form? I know I do, but although my husband had income in England last year, up until September, he hasn't had any foreign income SINCE he became a PR, so surely he doesn't need to declare his British income as was neither a US citizen or a PR while he was receiving the income, is this correct?
My husband (who is British and became a PR of the US in October 2011) is filing his taxes for the first time. We have a quick question: does he need to fill in the 2555 form? I know I do, but although my husband had income in England last year, up until September, he hasn't had any foreign income SINCE he became a PR, so surely he doesn't need to declare his British income as was neither a US citizen or a PR while he was receiving the income, is this correct?
#2
Re: Form 2555
He needs to declare all worldwide income for that year and then wite off the foreign taxes paid on form 1116.
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1116.pdf
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1116.pdf
#3
Just Joined
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5
Re: Form 2555
Hi Michael
My understanding was that the 1116 form was only to be filed in when a person has been taxed by both the foreign (in this case British) government and the U.S. government. This is not the case because when he was getting paid in England he was not a U.S. resident, he had no ties to the U.S. other than me, so does this form still apply to him?
My understanding, and im guessing that its wrong, was that he had to state worldwide income from the moment he becme a PR, not before.
My understanding was that the 1116 form was only to be filed in when a person has been taxed by both the foreign (in this case British) government and the U.S. government. This is not the case because when he was getting paid in England he was not a U.S. resident, he had no ties to the U.S. other than me, so does this form still apply to him?
My understanding, and im guessing that its wrong, was that he had to state worldwide income from the moment he becme a PR, not before.
#4
Re: Form 2555
Hi Michael
My understanding was that the 1116 form was only to be filed in when a person has been taxed by both the foreign (in this case British) government and the U.S. government. This is not the case because when he was getting paid in England he was not a U.S. resident, he had no ties to the U.S. other than me, so does this form still apply to him?
My understanding, and im guessing that its wrong, was that he had to state worldwide income from the moment he becme a PR, not before.
My understanding was that the 1116 form was only to be filed in when a person has been taxed by both the foreign (in this case British) government and the U.S. government. This is not the case because when he was getting paid in England he was not a U.S. resident, he had no ties to the U.S. other than me, so does this form still apply to him?
My understanding, and im guessing that its wrong, was that he had to state worldwide income from the moment he becme a PR, not before.
As far as the IRS is concerned, the money he made in the UK before becoming a LPR is taxable by the US government. However the IRS allows foreign tax credits to offset any US taxes owed.
An LPR cannot file as a non resident alien using the substantial presence test.
Last edited by Michael; Apr 13th 2012 at 3:58 am.
#5
Just Joined
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5
Re: Form 2555
Thanks Michael, I understand now
#6
Re: Form 2555
I think you have a basic misunderstanding of how the tax system works, read IRS publication 519.
If he moved to the US during 2011 he should be filing a dual-status tax return, i.e. a 1040NR for the part of the year he was tax resident in the UK and a 1040 for the rest of the year. The IRS uses the date permanent residency was granted to determine the breakpoint between the two.
If there was no US-source income until he became an LPR then essentially it is a pro-rated 1040 for the part of 2011 he was in the US. There is an example in 519 of how to do this.
LPRs almost never use Form 2555, this is for US persons employed abroad who have moved their tax home there. As an LPR your tax home has to be in the US and when you file an N-400 for citizenship one of the things USCIS looks at is whether you've been filing 1040s as a US resident, as this is legally required.
A declaration of permanent residency is exactly that, you permanently reside in the US.
I don't think Turbotax etc. can do dual-status returns, if you get stuck you need a specialist accountant, think KPMG or PWC rather than H&R Block.
There's also a bunch of other forms commonly used by immigrants, e.g. 8938 and also the FinCEN FBAR form.
If he moved to the US during 2011 he should be filing a dual-status tax return, i.e. a 1040NR for the part of the year he was tax resident in the UK and a 1040 for the rest of the year. The IRS uses the date permanent residency was granted to determine the breakpoint between the two.
If there was no US-source income until he became an LPR then essentially it is a pro-rated 1040 for the part of 2011 he was in the US. There is an example in 519 of how to do this.
LPRs almost never use Form 2555, this is for US persons employed abroad who have moved their tax home there. As an LPR your tax home has to be in the US and when you file an N-400 for citizenship one of the things USCIS looks at is whether you've been filing 1040s as a US resident, as this is legally required.
A declaration of permanent residency is exactly that, you permanently reside in the US.
I don't think Turbotax etc. can do dual-status returns, if you get stuck you need a specialist accountant, think KPMG or PWC rather than H&R Block.
There's also a bunch of other forms commonly used by immigrants, e.g. 8938 and also the FinCEN FBAR form.
#7
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,259
Re: Form 2555
Deleted.
Last edited by BritishGuy36; Apr 15th 2012 at 2:41 am. Reason: I'm talking nonesense, apparently.