Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > USA
Reload this Page >

First brush with US healthcare system

Wikiposts

First brush with US healthcare system

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 11th 2007, 4:55 am
  #61  
Bob
BE Site Lead
 
Bob's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 92,176
Bob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: First brush with US healthcare system

Originally Posted by BigDavyG
So about a month back I had my first dealings with the US healthcare system when I had to get a blood sample taken for some tests.
I was amazed when my insurance company sent me a breakdown of the charges - $338 for the blood work and a $91 fee from some doctor I have never even met.

So that's basically $430 for a blood test. Obviously my insurance covers the vast majority of that but I find that amount for some simple lab work to be absolutely disgusting.

Still, I guess this is America - land of the free - free to fleece anyone and everyone that is.
I liked by little tally sheet that included the cost of a bandage, the cost of a latex glove, and then the non-latex glove...even though my medical file has a huge red stamp saying latex allergy....
Bob is offline  
Old Apr 11th 2007, 4:57 am
  #62  
Bob
BE Site Lead
 
Bob's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 92,176
Bob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: First brush with US healthcare system

Originally Posted by NC Penguin
The cost of the three tests seems a little steep but you don't mention what tests were being performed. Perhaps something a little unusual?
titre tests cost around $270-300 without insurance, a tetanus costs around the same without insurance...
Bob is offline  
Old Apr 11th 2007, 4:58 am
  #63  
Septicity
 
fatbrit's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 23,762
fatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: First brush with US healthcare system

Originally Posted by Tracym
I simply said - socialized medicine is the definition all over the place for government run universal health care. So I don't see the problem with the word - it appears to simply be the truth.

And if Americans don't like it, that's up to them. And if the majority wants socialized medicine, they'll get it.
The term began as a somewhat pejorative phrase first popularized in 1920s and 1930s United States politics by conservative opponents of publicly operated health care, proposed during the administration of US President Franklin Roosevelt and later championed by US Senator Spessard Holland of Florida, Sen. Estes Kefauver of Tennessee and many more. Organizations that generally oppose expansion of government services still tend to use the phrase in that way.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialized_medicine

i.e. if you use that phrase, you are opposing it. Which is fine if you want to. But don't, please, pretend that it's a neutral term.
fatbrit is offline  
Old Apr 11th 2007, 5:02 am
  #64  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: NW Chicago suburbs
Posts: 11,253
Tracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: First brush with US healthcare system

Originally Posted by fatbrit
The term began as a somewhat pejorative phrase first popularized in 1920s and 1930s United States politics by conservative opponents of publicly operated health care, proposed during the administration of US President Franklin Roosevelt and later championed by US Senator Spessard Holland of Florida, Sen. Estes Kefauver of Tennessee and many more. Organizations that generally oppose expansion of government services still tend to use the phrase in that way.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialized_medicine

i.e. if you use that phrase, you are opposing it. Which is fine if you want to. But don't, please, pretend that it's a neutral term.
Well I wasn't pretending anything. Frankly I just did a search for the definition, and every definition I found sounded pretty neutral. I don't have any particular pre-conceptions about the term.

So can't say I personally was using the term to oppose it. Not by using the tem anyway.
Tracym is offline  
Old Apr 11th 2007, 5:03 am
  #65  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
scrubbedexpat099 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: First brush with US healthcare system

Originally Posted by Tracym
I simply said - socialized medicine is the definition all over the place for government run universal health care. So I don't see the problem with the word - it appears to simply be the truth.

And if Americans don't like it, that's up to them. And if the majority wants socialized medicine, they'll get it.
US Government spends more per person on health care than the UK Gov does.

So if the UK is Socialised, perhaps the US is Communised?
scrubbedexpat099 is offline  
Old Apr 11th 2007, 5:07 am
  #66  
Bob
BE Site Lead
 
Bob's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 92,176
Bob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: First brush with US healthcare system

Originally Posted by Tracym
Well not everyone agrees. And people have had bad experiences, they cannot be discounted either.
not this old china again.

personal experiences are just that, they don't account for the system as a whole.

given the two broken systems, I know which I would prefer, and I'll leave it at that.
Bob is offline  
Old Apr 11th 2007, 5:08 am
  #67  
Septicity
 
fatbrit's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 23,762
fatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: First brush with US healthcare system

Originally Posted by Boiler
So if the UK is Socialised, perhaps the US is
Communised?
Lobotomized?
fatbrit is offline  
Old Apr 11th 2007, 5:09 am
  #68  
Septicity
 
fatbrit's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 23,762
fatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: First brush with US healthcare system

Originally Posted by Tracym
Well I wasn't pretending anything. Frankly I just did a search for the definition, and every definition I found sounded pretty neutral. I don't have any particular pre-conceptions about the term.

So can't say I personally was using the term to oppose it. Not by using the tem anyway.
So now you know!
fatbrit is offline  
Old Apr 11th 2007, 5:09 am
  #69  
Bob
BE Site Lead
 
Bob's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 92,176
Bob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: First brush with US healthcare system

Originally Posted by Tracym

I was just surprised that someone takes offense at the term socialized medicine, since from what I can see it is just a standard definition. Everyone has an opinion of course.
It's not taking offence as much, just the bad connotations associated with it in the US...if your liberal your a pinko commie, if you want socialised health care, your a socialist pinko commie scum etc.
Bob is offline  
Old Apr 11th 2007, 5:09 am
  #70  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: The Big Apple
Posts: 1,834
Big D has a reputation beyond reputeBig D has a reputation beyond reputeBig D has a reputation beyond reputeBig D has a reputation beyond reputeBig D has a reputation beyond reputeBig D has a reputation beyond reputeBig D has a reputation beyond reputeBig D has a reputation beyond reputeBig D has a reputation beyond reputeBig D has a reputation beyond reputeBig D has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: First brush with US healthcare system

Originally Posted by BigDavyG
So about a month back I had my first dealings with the US healthcare system when I had to get a blood sample taken for some tests.
I was amazed when my insurance company sent me a breakdown of the charges - $338 for the blood work and a $91 fee from some doctor I have never even met.

So that's basically $430 for a blood test. Obviously my insurance covers the vast majority of that but I find that amount for some simple lab work to be absolutely disgusting.

Still, I guess this is America - land of the free - free to fleece anyone and everyone that is.

I went to the dentist for first time last week - $450 - now i know its been a while but it was only a poke around and a spit and polish!
Big D is offline  
Old Apr 11th 2007, 5:23 am
  #71  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: NW Chicago suburbs
Posts: 11,253
Tracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: First brush with US healthcare system

Originally Posted by Big D
I went to the dentist for first time last week - $450 - now i know its been a while but it was only a poke around and a spit and polish!
I'd be getting a different dentist. $80 for me.
Tracym is offline  
Old Apr 11th 2007, 5:23 am
  #72  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: NW Chicago suburbs
Posts: 11,253
Tracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: First brush with US healthcare system

Originally Posted by Bob
not this old china again.

personal experiences are just that, they don't account for the system as a whole.

given the two broken systems, I know which I would prefer, and I'll leave it at that.
me too
Tracym is offline  
Old Apr 11th 2007, 5:25 am
  #73  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: NW Chicago suburbs
Posts: 11,253
Tracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond reputeTracym has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: First brush with US healthcare system

Originally Posted by Boiler
US Government spends more per person on health care than the UK Gov does.

So if the UK is Socialised, perhaps the US is Communised?
so by Wiki's definition, universal is NOT the same as socialized.

From what I read, that would definitely make Canada's socialized then (last I looked private insurance was illegal there, although they were being forced to change that in one part of the country, due to some unacceptable delays).

So if we can't use the term "socialized" even though it fits the definition and "universal health care" is incorrect - what term would you use?
Tracym is offline  
Old Apr 11th 2007, 5:33 am
  #74  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: The Big Apple
Posts: 1,834
Big D has a reputation beyond reputeBig D has a reputation beyond reputeBig D has a reputation beyond reputeBig D has a reputation beyond reputeBig D has a reputation beyond reputeBig D has a reputation beyond reputeBig D has a reputation beyond reputeBig D has a reputation beyond reputeBig D has a reputation beyond reputeBig D has a reputation beyond reputeBig D has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: First brush with US healthcare system

Originally Posted by Tracym
I'd be getting a different dentist. $80 for me.
Not my money so I dont really care - I was just amazed!

Maybe its the Manhattan rates!
Big D is offline  
Old Apr 11th 2007, 5:34 am
  #75  
Septicity
 
fatbrit's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 23,762
fatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond reputefatbrit has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: First brush with US healthcare system

Originally Posted by Tracym
me too

In the interests of fairness (well, for a laugh, anyway), Trace, I went to Conservpedia and type "socialized" in the search box. On the first page, there's a link to Clinton, which states:

"Clinton was unable to "reform" health-care in the United States with a socialized health-care plan. It was a tough sell in the wake of the collapse of Soviet Bloc only a few years earlier. His approach consisted of appointing a planning committee with secret members to reshape this important sector of the economy. The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons successfully sued to force disclosure of the committee financing, expenses and membership. The program ultimately became so unpopular after two years the Democratically controlled Congress shielded its members records by never bringing it to floor for a vote."

There's a link on this entry for socialized that brings us to their Wiki page entitled socialism, containing the following gems:

"Socialism is an economic and political ideology based on public ownership of the means of production"

"many of the most notoriously oppressive dictatorships have been socialist in name, such as the Soviet Union"

"Wage earners suffer under Socialism, as it is hard to get paid in a system that discourages private persons from accummulating[SIC!] income."

"Although socialist parties are common in Europe, the leading examples all currently embrace some free enterprise, individual property rights and certain other aspects of capitalism although leading European Socialists are very critical of America."
fatbrit is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.