Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > USA
Reload this Page >

FATCA compliance letter

FATCA compliance letter

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 1st 2016, 10:10 pm
  #16  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
mrken30's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: Portlandia Metro
Posts: 7,425
mrken30 has a reputation beyond reputemrken30 has a reputation beyond reputemrken30 has a reputation beyond reputemrken30 has a reputation beyond reputemrken30 has a reputation beyond reputemrken30 has a reputation beyond reputemrken30 has a reputation beyond reputemrken30 has a reputation beyond reputemrken30 has a reputation beyond reputemrken30 has a reputation beyond reputemrken30 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: FATCA compliance letter

My bank will text my US number now. But for a long time it didn't work
mrken30 is offline  
Old Aug 2nd 2016, 7:55 am
  #17  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Location: Eee Bah Gum
Posts: 4,131
durham_lad has a reputation beyond reputedurham_lad has a reputation beyond reputedurham_lad has a reputation beyond reputedurham_lad has a reputation beyond reputedurham_lad has a reputation beyond reputedurham_lad has a reputation beyond reputedurham_lad has a reputation beyond reputedurham_lad has a reputation beyond reputedurham_lad has a reputation beyond reputedurham_lad has a reputation beyond reputedurham_lad has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: FATCA compliance letter

Originally Posted by iceflow
Interesting. We were in the UK two weeks ago and decided to ask the local Barclays to re-issue my wife's atm card as though the current one is still valid, it's nearing expiry and it was the devils own job getting her current one. Phone calls, notarized copies of passports etc. They duly obliged and on the day it arrived here, there was a second letter requesting W-9 & self certification. Coincidence? or do they have the systems set up to trigger the letters based upon some action...eg: renewing an expired atm card.
I think that anytime there is a change to the account, an employee or a computer reviews it which could trigger the FATCA request letter. We have had our US address with the same UK bank for 29 years, receive all our corresponce from them to the US address but only received a FATCA letter this year after we went into the bank in May to change our address to a UK address.
durham_lad is offline  
Old Aug 2nd 2016, 12:22 pm
  #18  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 120
iceflow has a reputation beyond reputeiceflow has a reputation beyond reputeiceflow has a reputation beyond reputeiceflow has a reputation beyond reputeiceflow has a reputation beyond reputeiceflow has a reputation beyond reputeiceflow has a reputation beyond reputeiceflow has a reputation beyond reputeiceflow has a reputation beyond reputeiceflow has a reputation beyond reputeiceflow has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: FATCA compliance letter

Originally Posted by durham_lad
I think that anytime there is a change to the account, an employee or a computer reviews it which could trigger the FATCA request letter. We have had our US address with the same UK bank for 29 years, receive all our corresponce from them to the US address but only received a FATCA letter this year after we went into the bank in May to change our address to a UK address.
Yep, I find it too much of a coincidence that the request for a new atm card resulted in the new card and a separate self certification request letter arriving, as it happened on the same day. There has to be some trigger event taking place either system or human initiated.
iceflow is offline  
Old Aug 2nd 2016, 1:30 pm
  #19  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Location: Athens GA
Posts: 2,134
MidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: FATCA compliance letter

All UK banks are going through procedures to identify anyone with possible US connections in order to comply with FATCA. How they do it, and how quickly, will vary from bank to bank. Mine (BOS) sent out an enquiry, I completed the W-9, job done! It was not difficult for them to identify me because my account uses my US address.
MidAtlantic is offline  
Old Aug 2nd 2016, 2:39 pm
  #20  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: Charlotte,NC
Posts: 1,717
Orangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: FATCA compliance letter

The deadline for the banks to have completed their due diligence on all pre-existing accounts was June 30 2016 hence the sudden rush at the end. Many banks weren't ready to start their FATCA inquiries due to system/technology implementation until quite a while after the July 1 14 start date.

The IGAs allow FIs to use DD they have on file for you so if they already have data referring to your US connection - any US indicia - they can mark the account as US reportable without having to reach out to the customer. Many are still playing catch up as 2016 "discovered accounts" don't have to be reported til May 2017. With the reporting threshold being 50K, I believe that many banks just didn't bother with their low value accounts, but now of course we have CRS that does not have thresholds.

I haven't heard from my UK bank at all (no US indicia) and my Cayman bank (with US address, SSN etc.) only got in touch with me last month - 7 days before the deadline (and I gave them everything when I was there back in January).
Orangepants is offline  
Old Aug 2nd 2016, 3:03 pm
  #21  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Location: Athens GA
Posts: 2,134
MidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: FATCA compliance letter

Originally Posted by Orangepants
The IGAs allow FIs to use DD they have on file for you so if they already have data referring to your US connection - any US indicia - they can mark the account as US reportable without having to reach out to the customer.
I thought they had to obtain the TIN for their reporting, which they could only do by contacting the customer.
MidAtlantic is offline  
Old Aug 2nd 2016, 3:31 pm
  #22  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: Charlotte,NC
Posts: 1,717
Orangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: FATCA compliance letter

Originally Posted by MidAtlantic
I thought they had to obtain the TIN for their reporting, which they could only do by contacting the customer.
It is preferable of course to get the TIN but they can use a DOB in lieu of TIN. A friend who works in this area for a retail bank told me that <50k accounts that have US indicia, they are making efforts to get the Self Cert but they are so far behind that they are concentrating on documenting the >50k for now.
Orangepants is offline  
Old Aug 2nd 2016, 7:39 pm
  #23  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 120
iceflow has a reputation beyond reputeiceflow has a reputation beyond reputeiceflow has a reputation beyond reputeiceflow has a reputation beyond reputeiceflow has a reputation beyond reputeiceflow has a reputation beyond reputeiceflow has a reputation beyond reputeiceflow has a reputation beyond reputeiceflow has a reputation beyond reputeiceflow has a reputation beyond reputeiceflow has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: FATCA compliance letter

Originally Posted by Orangepants
It is preferable of course to get the TIN but they can use a DOB in lieu of TIN. A friend who works in this area for a retail bank told me that <50k accounts that have US indicia, they are making efforts to get the Self Cert but they are so far behind that they are concentrating on documenting the >50k for now.
Interesting stuff, because I thought I'd read somewhere that if the account has less than 50K USD in it there was no need to report it as part of the due diligence as it was below the 'low value account' threshold set by IRS. Now we are not even close to 50K so I can only assume they made a mistake or are just playing safe and sending the letters out based upon some sort of account activity trigger.
iceflow is offline  
Old Aug 2nd 2016, 7:48 pm
  #24  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Location: Athens GA
Posts: 2,134
MidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond reputeMidAtlantic has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: FATCA compliance letter

Originally Posted by iceflow
Interesting stuff, because I thought I'd read somewhere that if the account has less than 50K USD in it there was no need to report it as part of the due diligence as it was below the 'low value account' threshold set by IRS. Now we are not even close to 50K so I can only assume they made a mistake or are just playing safe and sending the letters out based upon some sort of account activity trigger.
Banks are not required to review/identify/report accounts not exceeding $50,000 as of December 31, 2013. However, it seems that some banks are handling this by identifying any account with US connections, presumably in an attempt to get accounts in order. If we think this is a nightmare for us as taxpayers, it is even more of a nightmare for the banks.
MidAtlantic is offline  
Old Aug 2nd 2016, 8:01 pm
  #25  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: Charlotte,NC
Posts: 1,717
Orangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond reputeOrangepants has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: FATCA compliance letter

Originally Posted by MidAtlantic
Banks are not required to review/identify/report accounts not exceeding $50,000 as of December 31, 2013. However, it seems that some banks are handling this by identifying any account with US connections, presumably in an attempt to get accounts in order. If we think this is a nightmare for us as taxpayers, it is even more of a nightmare for the banks.
Yes exactly they are not required to review/report low value but most are doing the work, mainly because of the introduction of CRS which has no threshold. According to my friend in retail and my colleagues in asset management, FIs are ignoring the threshold and reporting ANY accounts that they have identified as US, irrespective of account balance. Same with UK - on account of UK CDOT.
Orangepants is offline  
Old Aug 2nd 2016, 9:52 pm
  #26  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Location: California
Posts: 233
Asg123 has a reputation beyond reputeAsg123 has a reputation beyond reputeAsg123 has a reputation beyond reputeAsg123 has a reputation beyond reputeAsg123 has a reputation beyond reputeAsg123 has a reputation beyond reputeAsg123 has a reputation beyond reputeAsg123 has a reputation beyond reputeAsg123 has a reputation beyond reputeAsg123 has a reputation beyond reputeAsg123 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: FATCA compliance letter

Originally Posted by Orangepants
Yes exactly they are not required to review/report low value but most are doing the work, mainly because of the introduction of CRS which has no threshold. According to my friend in retail and my colleagues in asset management, FIs are ignoring the threshold and reporting ANY accounts that they have identified as US, irrespective of account balance. Same with UK - on account of UK CDOT.
Yes, even if it's zero. I had a UK credit card with a low limit that I used very rarely and it didn't have a cashback feature so I never had a penny with them but they kept sending me W- forms to fill in so I closed it a few months ago to save me the hassle of filling in the forms.
Asg123 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.