DeLay wants a court review
#1
DeLay wants a court review
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7351884/...&ce=1&hl=DeLay wants*court review
DeLay and his cronies feel betrayed because it didn't go their way? I wish somebody would arrage a panal that would review this man
and why has he not yet made a statement about the fact that he and his family made the decision to pull his fathers plug all those years ago?
DeLay and his cronies feel betrayed because it didn't go their way? I wish somebody would arrage a panal that would review this man
and why has he not yet made a statement about the fact that he and his family made the decision to pull his fathers plug all those years ago?
Last edited by Bob; Apr 2nd 2005 at 7:01 pm. Reason: fix link
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DeLay wants a court review
My opinion..**** him. I realise its not much of an opinion nor very constructive but its the best I have.
#3
Re: DeLay wants a court review
Originally Posted by Celtic_Angel
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7351884/...&ce=1&hl=DeLay wants*court review
DeLay and his cronies feel betrayed because it didn't go their way? I wish somebody would arrage a panal that would review this man
and why has he not yet made a statement about the fact that he and his family made the decision to pull his fathers plug all those years ago?
DeLay and his cronies feel betrayed because it didn't go their way? I wish somebody would arrage a panal that would review this man
and why has he not yet made a statement about the fact that he and his family made the decision to pull his fathers plug all those years ago?
#4
Re: DeLay wants a court review
Delay wants a hefty kick in the knackers, more like.
What he and his ilk also apparently want is to rip up the constitution and institute a despotic theocracy, which is not something we heard from both sides in the last election. Yes, politicians on all sides can be dishonest and self-serving, but today's republicans are in a league of their own for that.
What he and his ilk also apparently want is to rip up the constitution and institute a despotic theocracy, which is not something we heard from both sides in the last election. Yes, politicians on all sides can be dishonest and self-serving, but today's republicans are in a league of their own for that.
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DeLay wants a court review
I like this quote:
"look at an arrogant, out-of-control, unaccountable judiciary that thumbed their nose at Congress and the president.
How about an out-of-control, unaccountable government that thumbs their noses at public opinion?
"look at an arrogant, out-of-control, unaccountable judiciary that thumbed their nose at Congress and the president.
How about an out-of-control, unaccountable government that thumbs their noses at public opinion?
#6
Re: DeLay wants a court review
Originally Posted by ImHere
I like this quote:
"look at an arrogant, out-of-control, unaccountable judiciary that thumbed their nose at Congress and the president.
How about an out-of-control, unaccountable government that thumbs their noses at public opinion?
"look at an arrogant, out-of-control, unaccountable judiciary that thumbed their nose at Congress and the president.
How about an out-of-control, unaccountable government that thumbs their noses at public opinion?
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DeLay wants a court review
Originally Posted by ukemigrant
Have we started talking about New Labour now or are we still talking about the US?
Take your pick....all one and the same really. I heard somewhere Uncle Tone is arranging with Dubya to make Britain the 51st state if the whole EU constitution thing falls on its arse.
#8
Re: DeLay wants a court review
Originally Posted by ImHere
Take your pick....all one and the same really. I heard somewhere Uncle Tone is arranging with Dubya to make Britain the 51st state if the whole EU constitution thing falls on its arse.
I heard many comments thrown around that the UK was becoming the 51st State of the USA due to it's ties with the US. All sarcasm as far as I know.
#10
Re: DeLay wants a court review
Originally Posted by Manc
the guy doesn't understand the phrase "checks and balances"
#11
Re: DeLay wants a court review
If I could only throw one politician out of Washington, it'd be DeLay. It's gotten so bad that I've switched buying sugar after 30 years of buying the same brand, just because it's made in his constituency.
I'm surprised more people don't call him a "sugar daddy."
Does a spoon full of sugar help a ton of horseshit go down more easily?
I'm surprised more people don't call him a "sugar daddy."
Does a spoon full of sugar help a ton of horseshit go down more easily?
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DeLay wants a court review
Originally Posted by rincewind
Isn't that just a comedic response to the buddying up with Dubya during the Iraq invasion?
I heard many comments thrown around that the UK was becoming the 51st State of the USA due to it's ties with the US. All sarcasm as far as I know.
I heard many comments thrown around that the UK was becoming the 51st State of the USA due to it's ties with the US. All sarcasm as far as I know.
Yes it is. And I was perpetuating the comedic response as it fit nicely with the comments.
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DeLay wants a court review
Originally Posted by ImHere
I like this quote:
"look at an arrogant, out-of-control, unaccountable judiciary that thumbed their nose at Congress and the president.
How about an out-of-control, unaccountable government that thumbs their noses at public opinion?
"look at an arrogant, out-of-control, unaccountable judiciary that thumbed their nose at Congress and the president.
How about an out-of-control, unaccountable government that thumbs their noses at public opinion?
#14
Re: DeLay wants a court review
Originally Posted by Franklin
Contrast with England, where, for example, the members of the Upper House are not subject to democratic elections and on that basis are unaccountable to the public.
which I grant, is a little bizarre.
but it does work.
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DeLay wants a court review
Originally Posted by Manc
but the system works.
which I grant, is a little bizarre.
but it does work.
which I grant, is a little bizarre.
but it does work.
The point I am making is that when Congress gets out of line, the U.S. Ct. knocks Congress back into its box as defined by the U.S. Constitution.
People seem to be knocking Congress for trying to interfere with a private family and purely state matter (since due process was accorded under state law).
Assuming arguendo (for sake of argument) that Congress was out of line ... was out of its Constitutionally defined box. Well, by refusing to hear the Terri case de novo, the US S. Ct. certainly put Congress back into its constitutionally defined box. The system of checks and balances worked, and with regard to this specific aspect of the Terri matter, we should all rejoice.