Condo in Chicago area
#31
Re: Condo in Chicago area
See my post above. It makes sense for that building in that particular block.
#32
Re: Condo in Chicago area
I suspect a high percentage of crime in Evanston is also likely in that area much like San Jose which is the safest large city in the US but has a small area where most of the crime is committed.
#33
Re: Condo in Chicago area
Yup. It's the border street with Chicago, and there are six blocks of it that have been that way for a long time.
#34
Re: Condo in Chicago area
In the houses I've bought, title insurance was just part of the cost of closing, it might theoretically have been optional, but though I may have had it explained to me, usually it is just another of those myriad of line item fees and charges.
#35
Forum Regular
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 214
Re: Condo in Chicago area
The safer parts of Evanston are the parts where condos cost way more than $50k. Yes everyone will tell you to move to Evanston, but they're not talking about this part. Most people recommending Evanston wouldn't even refer to this as Evanston. Obviously people do live here, but whether you want to live among them - well that's your call.
#36
BE Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 333
Re: Condo in Chicago area
Thanks for the comments guys. For the sake of arguments even far from the Howard street in the middle of Evanston IL there are plenty of cheap properties available.
http://www.trulia.com/property/31359...nston-IL-60202
This one seems to be in a pretty safe area. Still only $250K far cheaper than whats available in Sydney.
For condos I found other areas as well. Naperville for instance,
http://www.trulia.com/property/31376...60563#photo-21
This one is in the heart of Naperville, a walk to the station and in a great school district as well all though I don't have any kids but still. Property is way too attractive in the US.
http://www.trulia.com/property/31359...nston-IL-60202
This one seems to be in a pretty safe area. Still only $250K far cheaper than whats available in Sydney.
For condos I found other areas as well. Naperville for instance,
http://www.trulia.com/property/31376...60563#photo-21
This one is in the heart of Naperville, a walk to the station and in a great school district as well all though I don't have any kids but still. Property is way too attractive in the US.
#37
BE Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 333
Re: Condo in Chicago area
As Michael suggested there are some crime ridden areas on the southern border and towards northwest of Evanston I focused on the North Eastern side of Evanston and guess what, I still find a few gems
http://www.trulia.com/property/31386...60201#photo-10
This one is only 76K.
http://www.trulia.com/property/31386...60201#photo-10
This one is only 76K.
#38
Re: Condo in Chicago area
As Michael suggested there are some crime ridden areas on the southern border and towards northwest of Evanston I focused on the North Eastern side of Evanston and guess what, I still find a few gems
http://www.trulia.com/property/31386...60201#photo-10
This one is only 76K.
http://www.trulia.com/property/31386...60201#photo-10
This one is only 76K.
Might want to see how many other units are empty though as the HOA rate might climb or drop depending on occupancy.
#39
Re: Condo in Chicago area
Thanks for the comments guys. For the sake of arguments even far from the Howard street in the middle of Evanston IL there are plenty of cheap properties available.
http://www.trulia.com/property/31359...nston-IL-60202
This one seems to be in a pretty safe area. Still only $250K far cheaper than whats available in Sydney.
http://www.trulia.com/property/31359...nston-IL-60202
This one seems to be in a pretty safe area. Still only $250K far cheaper than whats available in Sydney.
#40
Forum Regular
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 214
Re: Condo in Chicago area
Again, spend some time in the area before deciding what is good value our not.
#41
Re: Condo in Chicago area
In California, HOA fees of $500 per month would normally be for high end condos with a pool, fitness center, high garden/lawn maintenance, and other amenities.
Sometimes condos have fees that are too low to cover future reserves to cover maintenance for major replacements such as roofs and siding and eventually they either have to have a special assessment for the repairs or significantly increase HOA fees to cover the repairs. Sometimes a condo will eventually have to make the repairs and have to take out a loan and the payments are included in the HOA fees.
Last edited by Michael; Nov 25th 2013 at 7:16 pm.
#42
Re: Condo in Chicago area
That is very high by California standards. I suspect there must be some major repairs that need to be done causing the HOA fees to be so high which may possibly also be causing the asking price of the condos to be reduced.
In California, HOA fees of $500 per month would normally be for high end condos with a pool, fitness center, high garden/lawn maintenance, and other amenities.
Sometimes condos have fees that are too low to cover future reserves to cover maintenance for major replacements such as roofs and siding and eventually they either have to have a special assessment for the repairs or significantly increase HOA fees to cover the repairs. Sometimes a condo will eventually have to make the repairs and have to take out a loan and the payments are included in the HOA fees.
In California, HOA fees of $500 per month would normally be for high end condos with a pool, fitness center, high garden/lawn maintenance, and other amenities.
Sometimes condos have fees that are too low to cover future reserves to cover maintenance for major replacements such as roofs and siding and eventually they either have to have a special assessment for the repairs or significantly increase HOA fees to cover the repairs. Sometimes a condo will eventually have to make the repairs and have to take out a loan and the payments are included in the HOA fees.
#43
Re: Condo in Chicago area
That is very high by California standards. I suspect there must be some major repairs that need to be done causing the HOA fees to be so high which may possibly also be causing the asking price of the condos to be reduced.
In California, HOA fees of $500 per month would normally be for high end condos with a pool, fitness center, high garden/lawn maintenance, and other amenities.
Sometimes condos have fees that are too low to cover future reserves to cover maintenance for major replacements such as roofs and siding and eventually they either have to have a special assessment for the repairs or significantly increase HOA fees to cover the repairs. Sometimes a condo will eventually have to make the repairs and have to take out a loan and the payments are included in the HOA fees.
In California, HOA fees of $500 per month would normally be for high end condos with a pool, fitness center, high garden/lawn maintenance, and other amenities.
Sometimes condos have fees that are too low to cover future reserves to cover maintenance for major replacements such as roofs and siding and eventually they either have to have a special assessment for the repairs or significantly increase HOA fees to cover the repairs. Sometimes a condo will eventually have to make the repairs and have to take out a loan and the payments are included in the HOA fees.
But on a mortgage that low, it's not to bad.
I would never jump on a place without first knowing the area a bit before hand though.
#44
Re: Condo in Chicago area
But with $850 on monthly fees, and a loan payment of around $450, after allowing for repairs and maintenance, a landlord wouldn't be making anything until the rent reached around $1,700-$1,800. Would such a unit be worth that much?
Last edited by Pulaski; Nov 25th 2013 at 9:30 pm.
#45
Re: Condo in Chicago area
California laws also require a HOA to have reserves to cover major repairs/maintenance but many low priced condos use untrained members to manage the condo and follow regulations. In fact my ex had a condo in a 50 unit complex that was managed by it's members with very low HOA fees and when there was a small amount of storm damage (less than $5,000), there wasn't enough reserves to repair the damage.