Birthright citizenship?
#16
Re: Birthright citizenship?
Originally Posted by britchicknyc
A lot of people are in favour of this idea here in the US to stop Mexicans coming over on "vacation" having a baby and then trying to bring over the whole family.
It would be 18 years before the child could file for immediate family. And about another 10 years to get their siblings over here. Surely they could find a more immediate route.
#17
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 920
Re: Birthright citizenship?
Originally Posted by ironporer
I have to think that there should be more of a permenant tie to the land- be it parents being citizens or legal residents, or having lived here X years. I believe many Euro countries (Switz and Ireland come to mind(?) restrict citizenship in this manner.
Just because you popped out a baby on your VWP visit to Disney, baby should not be US Citizen automatically.
Just because you popped out a baby on your VWP visit to Disney, baby should not be US Citizen automatically.
the 14th Amendment was a mess from the beginning. It was necessary but wasn't well thought out. I wouldn't be surprised it there is a lot of problems/challenges trying to change it just because of the history involved and the people it affected at the time.
#18
Re: Birthright citizenship?
Originally Posted by Elvira
This would make sense. Something along British lines.
In the UK, the 'alien' parents have to be permanent residents in order for a child be British at birth, but I believe that children born in Britain can also be registered as British citizens if the parents obtain permanent leave ot remain at a later stage.
In the UK, the 'alien' parents have to be permanent residents in order for a child be British at birth, but I believe that children born in Britain can also be registered as British citizens if the parents obtain permanent leave ot remain at a later stage.
You're correct about cases where the parents obtain indefinite leave to remain (or British citizenship) later on. The child can also usually be registered as British if it cannot get the nationality of either parent (ie, is stateless).
There's an additional concession - a child born in the UK who lives in the UK until age 10 is *entitled* to be registered as a British citizen, irrespective of the child's citizenship, immigration status (or the parent's).
The UK law change took effect on 1 January 1983. No-one born before then is affected.
Australia (from 1986), Ireland (from 2005) and New Zealand (from 2006) made similar changes in their laws.
Jeremy
Jeremy
#19
Re: Birthright citizenship?
Originally Posted by mdyoung
At least one parent should have to be a United States citizen for a child born here to be a citizen.
The 14th admendment of the constitution making anyone born here a citizen was to makes slaves citizens after they were freed, not for women to run over the border and drop a baby.
Jeremy
#20
Re: Birthright citizenship?
When I first read the OP my initial response was going to be something like:
"Only if their parents were in this country legally." Not necessarily citizens but at least here on valid visas.
I've had the day to think about it and I've decided that is not at all fair or compassionate and doesn't really reflect how I (ideally) view America. If the child is born here he/she should automatically receive full citizenship. Anything less is punishing the child for the sins of the parents. Imagine how any of us would feel to have lived in a country our entire lives only to be kicked out (of the only home we've ever known) when it was discovered that our parent(s) were illegal? I find that approach to be cruel and inhumane.
"Only if their parents were in this country legally." Not necessarily citizens but at least here on valid visas.
I've had the day to think about it and I've decided that is not at all fair or compassionate and doesn't really reflect how I (ideally) view America. If the child is born here he/she should automatically receive full citizenship. Anything less is punishing the child for the sins of the parents. Imagine how any of us would feel to have lived in a country our entire lives only to be kicked out (of the only home we've ever known) when it was discovered that our parent(s) were illegal? I find that approach to be cruel and inhumane.
#21
Re: Birthright citizenship?
Originally Posted by Leslie66
When I first read the OP my initial response was going to be something like:
"Only if their parents were in this country legally." Not necessarily citizens but at least here on valid visas.
I've had the day to think about it and I've decided that is not at all fair or compassionate and doesn't really reflect how I (ideally) view America. If the child is born here he/she should automatically receive full citizenship. Anything less is punishing the child for the sins of the parents. Imagine how any of us would feel to have lived in a country our entire lives only to be kicked out (of the only home we've ever known) when it was discovered that our parent(s) were illegal? I find that approach to be cruel and inhumane.
"Only if their parents were in this country legally." Not necessarily citizens but at least here on valid visas.
I've had the day to think about it and I've decided that is not at all fair or compassionate and doesn't really reflect how I (ideally) view America. If the child is born here he/she should automatically receive full citizenship. Anything less is punishing the child for the sins of the parents. Imagine how any of us would feel to have lived in a country our entire lives only to be kicked out (of the only home we've ever known) when it was discovered that our parent(s) were illegal? I find that approach to be cruel and inhumane.
This was specifically put into the law when they removed automatic citizenship to prevent cases like this.
Jeremy
#22
Re: Birthright citizenship?
Originally Posted by mdyoung
At least one parent should have to be a United States citizen for a child born here to be a citizen.
The 14th Amendment helps preserve one of the very few vestiges of a nation who once "welcomed" immigrants.
The new legislation is specifically targeted towards Mexican and Central/South American alien parents who cross the border to have their child, or who are already here illegally. If there is any reason to expect a difficult birth or an ill infant, the outcome will be better here even in the poorest hospital than back home.
We get right back to the fact that the US government continues to deliberately exploit cheap labour by not even trying to close the border and by not punishing companies that use the labour. Yet these same people want to strip a baby of citizenship. Charming.
#23
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,109
Re: Birthright citizenship?
Originally Posted by Leslie66
I've had the day to think about it and I've decided that is not at all fair or compassionate and doesn't really reflect how I (ideally) view America. If the child is born here he/she should automatically receive full citizenship. Anything less is punishing the child for the sins of the parents. Imagine how any of us would feel to have lived in a country our entire lives only to be kicked out (of the only home we've ever known) when it was discovered that our parent(s) were illegal? I find that approach to be cruel and inhumane.
#24
Re: Birthright citizenship?
Originally Posted by mdyoung
That is only one part of the immigration reform bill, but it's part of the overall package to take away incentives for people to come here illegally. Laws are laws. If you are here illegally you aren't supposed to be here and goes for your kids too. See ya.
#25
Re: Birthright citizenship?
Originally Posted by JAJ
You may not then be aware that a child born in the UK or Australia to "illegal" parents is able to become a citizen at age 10 if he or she has lived in the country until then.
This was specifically put into the law when they removed automatic citizenship to prevent cases like this.
Jeremy
This was specifically put into the law when they removed automatic citizenship to prevent cases like this.
Jeremy
#26
Re: Birthright citizenship?
Originally Posted by mdyoung
That is only one part of the immigration reform bill, but it's part of the overall package to take away incentives for people to come here illegally. Laws are laws. If you are here illegally you aren't supposed to be here and goes for your kids too. See ya.
#27
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,109
Re: Birthright citizenship?
Originally Posted by snowbunny
I disagree.
The 14th Amendment helps preserve one of the very few vestiges of a nation who once "welcomed" immigrants.
The new legislation is specifically targeted towards Mexican and Central/South American alien parents who cross the border to have their child, or who are already here illegally. If there is any reason to expect a difficult birth or an ill infant, the outcome will be better here even in the poorest hospital than back home.
We get right back to the fact that the US government continues to deliberately exploit cheap labour by not even trying to close the border and by not punishing companies that use the labour. Yet these same people want to strip a baby of citizenship. Charming.
The 14th Amendment helps preserve one of the very few vestiges of a nation who once "welcomed" immigrants.
The new legislation is specifically targeted towards Mexican and Central/South American alien parents who cross the border to have their child, or who are already here illegally. If there is any reason to expect a difficult birth or an ill infant, the outcome will be better here even in the poorest hospital than back home.
We get right back to the fact that the US government continues to deliberately exploit cheap labour by not even trying to close the border and by not punishing companies that use the labour. Yet these same people want to strip a baby of citizenship. Charming.
It's not my fault that the countries where these people are born are so assbackwards and corrupt that they can produce enough jobs or health care.
That "we are the world" is a bunch of BS. If it was up to me they would already be building that wall across the border and the troops in Iraq would be on our border.
#28
Back where I belong!
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne, Oz to Banbury, England to El Mirage, AZ & now back to England!
Posts: 5,989
Re: Birthright citizenship?
Originally Posted by JAJ
Only one parent has to be a permanent resident (or British citizen).
You're correct about cases where the parents obtain indefinite leave to remain (or British citizenship) later on. The child can also usually be registered as British if it cannot get the nationality of either parent (ie, is stateless).
There's an additional concession - a child born in the UK who lives in the UK until age 10 is *entitled* to be registered as a British citizen, irrespective of the child's citizenship, immigration status (or the parent's).
The UK law change took effect on 1 January 1983. No-one born before then is affected.
Australia (from 1986), Ireland (from 2005) and New Zealand (from 2006) made similar changes in their laws.
Jeremy
Jeremy
You're correct about cases where the parents obtain indefinite leave to remain (or British citizenship) later on. The child can also usually be registered as British if it cannot get the nationality of either parent (ie, is stateless).
There's an additional concession - a child born in the UK who lives in the UK until age 10 is *entitled* to be registered as a British citizen, irrespective of the child's citizenship, immigration status (or the parent's).
The UK law change took effect on 1 January 1983. No-one born before then is affected.
Australia (from 1986), Ireland (from 2005) and New Zealand (from 2006) made similar changes in their laws.
Jeremy
Jeremy
#29
Re: Birthright citizenship?
Originally Posted by mdyoung
Well maybe it could be amended to be one or both parent have been permanant residents for X number of years, but illegals no way José.
It's not my fault that the countries where these people are born are so assbackwards and corrupt that they can produce enough jobs or health care.
That "we are the world" is a bunch of BS. If it was up to me they would already be building that wall across the border and the troops in Iraq would be on our border.
It's not my fault that the countries where these people are born are so assbackwards and corrupt that they can produce enough jobs or health care.
That "we are the world" is a bunch of BS. If it was up to me they would already be building that wall across the border and the troops in Iraq would be on our border.
#30
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,109
Re: Birthright citizenship?
Originally Posted by snowbunny
How about punishing the people who employ them? They wouldn't be here unless they were making money.