Is it bigamy?
#16
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
As there is no federal doctrine for this, that would be Kentucky's decision.
Judging from this, I would think that Kentucky would have a tough time denying the straight marriage, as gay marriages, both in-state and out of state, are considered "void," i.e. it doesn't acknowledge them at all.
http://law.justia.com/codes/kentucky/2011/402-00
Given that, I would think that any effort by Kentucky to block the straight marriage would put the state into a bit of a pickle, since the state would effectively be recognizing a marriage that it claims not to recognize.
Judging from this, I would think that Kentucky would have a tough time denying the straight marriage, as gay marriages, both in-state and out of state, are considered "void," i.e. it doesn't acknowledge them at all.
http://law.justia.com/codes/kentucky/2011/402-00
Given that, I would think that any effort by Kentucky to block the straight marriage would put the state into a bit of a pickle, since the state would effectively be recognizing a marriage that it claims not to recognize.
![sir_eccles is offline](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#17
Bloody Yank
![](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/ranks/star.gif)
![](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/ranks/star.gif)
![](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/ranks/star.gif)
![](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/ranks/star.gif)
![](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/ranks/star.gif)
![](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/ranks/star.gif)
![](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/ranks/star.gif)
![](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/ranks/star.gif)
![](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/ranks/star.gif)
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: USA! USA!
Posts: 4,186
![RoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond repute](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![RoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond repute](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![RoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond repute](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![RoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond repute](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![RoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond repute](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![RoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond repute](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/reputation/reputation_highpos.gif)
![RoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond repute](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/reputation/reputation_highpos.gif)
![RoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond repute](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/reputation/reputation_highpos.gif)
![RoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond repute](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/reputation/reputation_highpos.gif)
![RoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond repute](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/reputation/reputation_highpos.gif)
![RoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond repute](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/reputation/reputation_highpos.gif)
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
According to Kentucky, it isn't legally possible to be married to a person of your own gender. Regardless of what you say or don't say, the state law explicitly says that you're not married.
![RoadWarriorFromLP is offline](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#18
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
A related question might be would a Kentucky court entertain a dissolution action? Or what about intestate succession?
![S Folinsky is offline](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#20
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
![scrubbedexpat099 is an unknown quantity at this point](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/reputation/reputation_balance.gif)
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I also vote that you can not be considered Married by Kentucky, Marriage is a State not Federal issue. There is no Federal law that over rides State law in this case.
![scrubbedexpat099 is offline](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#21
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Here's a twist. If Kentucky does not recognize the California marriage, he can honestly state that he is not married on Kentucky's official forms. Later, in a California court, where his original marriage is still recognized, he can be accused of false swearing or whatever the legal term is.
![paddingtongreen is offline](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#22
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Pretty sure I read about a case where they had difficulty getting a divorce in a state that didn't recognize their same sex marriage. Can't remember the details though.
![sir_eccles is offline](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#23
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Of course someone would NEVER try that just to mess with Kentucky, or any other state like that, would they.....
![Popcorn](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/smilies/popcorn.gif)
![Mr Weeze is offline](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)