![]() |
Australians in US
Question from Australians in USA, how has your experience been here so far? Do you think you are better off here in US as compared to OZ? Do you earn more? Do you have a better job? Do you live a better life? How do you think you life would change if you go back?
|
Re: Australians in US
I can't really do the job in Australia that I have here, so workwise I don't have a lot of choice - my profession is very new in Australia.
Personally, I quite like being the odd man out here, as most people are positive about Australians here. I missed being asked about my accent when I was home for a while! I miss things about each country when I'm in the other. I would go home, or stay here - I like both. I would be financially worse off at home due to housing costs in Melbourne versus Pittsburgh in relation to my income. I'd rather be in Australia for the healthcare and schooling, esp now that I am having my own kid. |
Re: Australians in US
The E-3 is a good visa for getting access to opportunities, avoiding the H-1B requirements/quota etc, spouse has work rights, and so on.
But long term, is it really a secure basis to build a life in the United States? Unless there is a clear pathway to a green card. |
Re: Australians in US
Originally Posted by e3geek
(Post 11362736)
Question from Australians in USA, how has your experience been here so far? Do you think you are better off here in US as compared to OZ? Do you earn more? Do you have a better job? Do you live a better life? How do you think you life would change if you go back?
|
Re: Australians in US
Originally Posted by JAJ
(Post 11364364)
The E-3 is a good visa for getting access to opportunities, avoiding the H-1B requirements/quota etc, spouse has work rights, and so on.
But long term, is it really a secure basis to build a life in the United States? Unless there is a clear pathway to a green card. |
Re: Australians in US
Originally Posted by e3geek
(Post 11364591)
Perm residency in USA is a big issue even on H1B.
|
Re: Australians in US
Originally Posted by economy_1
(Post 11364560)
One dont have mandatory/must pay superannuation (9%).If somebody dont want to contribute towards 401(k) or superannuation its his/her own choice in US.
|
Re: Australians in US
Originally Posted by economy_1
(Post 11364863)
It depends in which category it is applied.EB1C is the best.
Also it depends upon country of Birth but since H1B have dual intent one can immediately start working for another employer as soon as he applies for transfer (priority processing). |
Re: Australians in US
Originally Posted by teza
(Post 11365299)
Actually, the mandatory 9.5% payment is made by the employer, NOT the employee;)
|
Re: Australians in US
Originally Posted by hungryhorace
(Post 11365374)
And how does one qualify for said category? If you are not a multi-national manager or executive, you're going to be waiting a long time.
All visas are dual intent. That the H-1B is 'dual intent' is NOT the reason a holder can start working for another employer once he files for a transfer. If somebody is not multi-national manager or executive there are EB-2 and EB-3 options. All visas are not dual intent.H1B and L1 are regarded dual intent.This is known as "dual intent" and has been recognized in immigration law since passage of the Immigration Act of 1990. During the time that the application for LPR status is pending, a nonimmigrant in valid H-1B or L-1 status may travel on his or her visa rather than obtaining advance parole or requesting other advance permission from USCIS to return to the U.S. http://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/f...grant_Empl.pdf H1B supports priority processing (as I mentioned earlier) therefore one can immediately start working for new employers rather than waiting for USCIS approval for months. |
Re: Australians in US
Originally Posted by economy_1
(Post 11365486)
If somebody is not multi-national manager or executive there are EB-2 and EB-3 options.
All visas are not dual intent. H1B and L1 are regarded dual intent.This is known as "dual intent" and has been recognized in immigration law since passage of the Immigration Act of 1990. During the time that the application for LPR status is pending, a nonimmigrant in valid H-1B or L-1 status may travel on his or her visa rather than obtaining advance parole or requesting other advance permission from USCIS to return to the U.S. Can you please stop posting such complete and utter twaddle? |
Re: Australians in US
Originally Posted by hungryhorace
(Post 11365507)
Yes. They. Are.
But it doesn't really matter and people make WAY too much of a big deal about it. Immigrant intent is not shown when the employer files the I-140, because the beneficiary has no control over the filing. Immigrant intent is shown when the beneficiary applies for an immigrant visa or AOS. AOS doesn't take very long so all it really means is you can't renew your current non-immigrant status after filing the I-485. But why would you want to anyway? It's a minor issue. Can you please stop posting such complete and utter twaddle? |
Re: Australians in US
Originally Posted by economy_1
(Post 11365486)
If somebody is not multi-national manager or executive there are EB-2 and EB-3 options.
All visas are not dual intent.H1B and L1 are regarded dual intent.This is known as "dual intent" and has been recognized in immigration law since passage of the Immigration Act of 1990. During the time that the application for LPR status is pending, a nonimmigrant in valid H-1B or L-1 status may travel on his or her visa rather than obtaining advance parole or requesting other advance permission from USCIS to return to the U.S. Switching from E-3 to H-1B is often possible but subject to the H-1B quota, and loss of work rights for spouse. |
Re: Australians in US
Well the usual trick is to renew your non-immigrant status so you have plenty of time remaining before the I-485 is filed, so that would mean the I-140 was filed separately. You have to file separately if it's EB-3 anyway.
|
Re: Australians in US
Originally Posted by JAJ
(Post 11364364)
The E-3 is a good visa for getting access to opportunities, avoiding the H-1B requirements/quota etc, spouse has work rights, and so on.
But long term, is it really a secure basis to build a life in the United States? Unless there is a clear pathway to a green card. |
Re: Australians in US
as someone said, you can't compare the Aus lifestyle and medical benefits to US. having said this, i have a better job opportunities and the main thing the work i do, i enjoy here. yes as with any country, there are pros and cons. its a personal preference. Also it all depends upon which part of US you live in.
regarding work visa, i am in process of switching from L2 to E3 (been here for 5 years). I had an option to go for H1 but as wife is working, i can not switch to H1 due to h4 visa restriction. also, there are no cap on how many times you can renew your e3 visa. on topic of GC, yes you can file for GC even though you are on E3. you just need to file for AOS before filing for I-485. |
Re: Australians in US
Originally Posted by Sevusal
(Post 11368260)
you just need to file for AOS before filing for I-485.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 1:25 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.