Wikiposts

401k

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 19th 2006, 5:25 am
  #46  
Homebody
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: HOME
Posts: 23,182
Elvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond reputeElvira has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 401k

Originally Posted by paddingtongreen
The problem with index funds, and ETFs ........
What about investing in equities direct rather than via funds, particularly high-yield stock in big, 'safe' companies (utilities, retailers, banks, commercial property companies etc)?

The logic being that these companies have been around a long time and (barring disaster) will still be around in 20-30 years time, provide essential services that people need and thus are likely to at least maintain their value and probably grow a bit too, and pay high dividends.

And of course the costs are much lower than with funds, particularly for those who can resist the urge the trade unless there is a pressing reason to do so.
Elvira is offline  
Old Nov 19th 2006, 5:59 am
  #47  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,884
Giantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 401k

Originally Posted by paddingtongreen
The problem with index funds, and ETFs that follow them, is that they go down as well as up, with the market. A balanced fund cashes in by selling stock when it is high priced and buying bonds and vice versa.

As you approach retirement, your portfolio should carry less risk. There is no "magic single way".

If you are hands off, the "Life cycle fund" is the choice, they rebalance between stocks and bonds and reduce risk as the years go by.

If you are a little "hands on", you could buy two index ETFs, one following a stock index and one following a bond index.
Or buy a set of ETFs including those that follow foreign stock/bond indices and also commodities. Good idea to hedge against a weakening dollar, imo, by making sure you're invested in non-dollar assets as well.

An advantage of ETFs is that they tend to be a lot more tax efficient than mutual funds in that they don't have to distribute capital gains every year. Of course, this advantage is lost in a tax-deferred account, which is why I tend to invest in ETFs and individual stocks in taxable accounts. The downside of ETFs is that you have to pay commission to buy/sell just like an ordinary stock. So if you're saving relatively small amounts on a regular basis into a retirement account, the buying costs can add up.
Giantaxe is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.