what would be easier
Nov 18th 2003, 2:55 am
#16
SUPER CRUNCHY BALCONY COW
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,476
Re: what would be easier
Originally posted by jeffreyhy
tweeky,
Interesting... How many times have you been a K3?
Anyway, remember that not all consulates work at the same speed. I think that as things are going right now, 5 months is a bare minimum for a very speedy consulate. Few people are going to get through it that quickly.
Regards, JEff
tweeky,
Interesting... How many times have you been a K3?
Anyway, remember that not all consulates work at the same speed. I think that as things are going right now, 5 months is a bare minimum for a very speedy consulate. Few people are going to get through it that quickly.
Regards, JEff
Nov 18th 2003, 5:57 am
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: what would be easier
Thank you jeffreyhy!!! YOU get it!!
I am still trying to figure out how it seems a lot of folks receipted in
30 days (I really do think my file was sent to the wrong center as
someone else on this board pointed out the possibility of that happening
and not to Missouri, I have been here for about 2 months and can't
recall anyone else having to wait two months to receipt.)
One thing I have learned---even if you DO have legal representation,
that should not be the ONLY source of K-3 info at your disposal.
Informed is AWARE!!! (and again, everyone here, with the exception of
one person and she knows who she is, has been helpful to me....)
Re: what would be easier
Group: alt.visa.us.marriage-based Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2003, 12:37pm
(EST+5) From: member@british_expats.com (jeffreyhy)
Maryanne,
Thanks for clearing that up. From initial filing of the I-130 to visa at
your particular consulate I agree, then, that your estimate is
reasonable.
I was confused because your post said "(that does NOT include the time
for the interview at the Embassy in
London.) " Â So I thought that you were talking about the petition
phase only.
Regards, JEff
Originally posted by Maryanne Kehoe
I am figuring the time as when it is sent from the atty. office (aprox
9/12 or 9/13) to the actual time Ken walks out with his visa.
September sent to MSC
Recepited Nov. 7th
*estimated date of approval 2/28*
That is 6 months right there.
--
Posted via http://britishexpats.com
I am still trying to figure out how it seems a lot of folks receipted in
30 days (I really do think my file was sent to the wrong center as
someone else on this board pointed out the possibility of that happening
and not to Missouri, I have been here for about 2 months and can't
recall anyone else having to wait two months to receipt.)
One thing I have learned---even if you DO have legal representation,
that should not be the ONLY source of K-3 info at your disposal.
Informed is AWARE!!! (and again, everyone here, with the exception of
one person and she knows who she is, has been helpful to me....)
Re: what would be easier
Group: alt.visa.us.marriage-based Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2003, 12:37pm
(EST+5) From: member@british_expats.com (jeffreyhy)
Maryanne,
Thanks for clearing that up. From initial filing of the I-130 to visa at
your particular consulate I agree, then, that your estimate is
reasonable.
I was confused because your post said "(that does NOT include the time
for the interview at the Embassy in
London.) " Â So I thought that you were talking about the petition
phase only.
Regards, JEff
Originally posted by Maryanne Kehoe
I am figuring the time as when it is sent from the atty. office (aprox
9/12 or 9/13) to the actual time Ken walks out with his visa.
September sent to MSC
Recepited Nov. 7th
*estimated date of approval 2/28*
That is 6 months right there.
--
Posted via http://britishexpats.com
Nov 18th 2003, 8:13 am
#18
WTF?
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Homeostasis
Posts: 79,449
Re: what would be easier
[i]
(and again, everyone here, with the exception of
one person and she knows who she is, has been helpful to me....)
(and again, everyone here, with the exception of
one person and she knows who she is, has been helpful to me....)
This is a pretty childish statement. Apparently you don't know how to quit while you're ahead.
I had actually decided to take it easy on you and haven't said too much of anything to you lately. Apparently, you are too self-absorbed to have even noticed that. Your posts are still as convoluted and off-the-wall as they always were, I had just gotten tired of hearing myself bitch about it. In the beginning I was actually trying to help you. But I got disgusted because .......you don't listen when people do answer your questions because your fishing for an answer you like better ...... you are argumentative and insulting with the people that do try to help you........... you ask bizarre questions that nobody can possibly answer and then get pissy because nobody breaks their neck trying answer you ......... you only ever give half of the information, and people have to keep asking you to clarify your post ............ AND you think you know everything anyway so why bother asking?
Leslie
Last edited by Leslie; Nov 18th 2003 at 8:19 am.
Nov 18th 2003, 8:48 am
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: what would be easier
PLONK
Re: what would be easier
Group: alt.visa.us.marriage-based Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2003, 9:13pm
(EST+5) From: member@british_expats.com (Leslie66)
    (and again, everyone here, with the exception of
one person and she knows who she is, has been helpful to me....)
Maryanne,
This is a pretty childish statement. Apparently you don't know how to
quit while you're ahead.
I had actually decided to take it easy on you and haven't said too much
of anything to you lately. Apparently, you are too self-absorbed to have
even noticed that. Your posts are still as convoluted and off-the- wall
as they always were, I had just gotten tired of hearing myself bitch
about it. In the beginning I was actually trying to help you. But I got
disgusted because .......you don't listen when people do answer your
questions because your fishing for an answer you like better ..... you
are argumentative and insulting with the people that do try to help
you........... you ask bizarre questions that nobody can possibly answer
and then get pissy because nobody breaks their neck trying answer you
........ you only ever give half of the information, and people have to
keep asking you to clarify your post ............ AND you think you know
everything anyway so why bother asking?
Leslie
--
Posted via http://britishexpats.com
Re: what would be easier
Group: alt.visa.us.marriage-based Date: Tue, Nov 18, 2003, 9:13pm
(EST+5) From: member@british_expats.com (Leslie66)
    (and again, everyone here, with the exception of
one person and she knows who she is, has been helpful to me....)
Maryanne,
This is a pretty childish statement. Apparently you don't know how to
quit while you're ahead.
I had actually decided to take it easy on you and haven't said too much
of anything to you lately. Apparently, you are too self-absorbed to have
even noticed that. Your posts are still as convoluted and off-the- wall
as they always were, I had just gotten tired of hearing myself bitch
about it. In the beginning I was actually trying to help you. But I got
disgusted because .......you don't listen when people do answer your
questions because your fishing for an answer you like better ..... you
are argumentative and insulting with the people that do try to help
you........... you ask bizarre questions that nobody can possibly answer
and then get pissy because nobody breaks their neck trying answer you
........ you only ever give half of the information, and people have to
keep asking you to clarify your post ............ AND you think you know
everything anyway so why bother asking?
Leslie
--
Posted via http://britishexpats.com
Nov 18th 2003, 9:08 am
#20
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 2,345
Re: what would be easier
Originally posted by jeffreyhy
tweeky,
Interesting... How many times have you been a K3?
Regards, JEff
tweeky,
Interesting... How many times have you been a K3?
Regards, JEff
Nov 18th 2003, 2:34 pm
#21
Boise, ID
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Boise, ID (formerly Vancouver, BC, Canada)
Posts: 239
Re: what would be easier
um....what does that mean??
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Maryanne Kehoe
PLONK
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Maryanne Kehoe
PLONK
Nov 19th 2003, 8:15 am
#22
WTF?
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Homeostasis
Posts: 79,449
Re: what would be easier
Absolutely nothing.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by katie4998
um....what does that mean??
[QUOTE]Originally posted by katie4998
um....what does that mean??
Originally posted by Maryanne Kehoe
PLONK
PLONK
Nov 20th 2003, 4:41 am
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: what would be easier
In article <[email protected]>, katie4998
<member@british_expats.com> writes
>Originally posted by Maryanne Kehoe
>> PLONK
>um....what does that mean??
Its a usenet term (usually written as *plonk*) that indicates publicly
that the writer has killfiled the previous poster. Although it sounds
drastic, all that happens is that their newsreader is configured
henceforth not to fetch future articles from that source.
Although Maryanne has been a prolific usenet poster since about 1997 and
has used this term before, she has significantly never explained exactly
how she configures her WebTV to actually do this (hint: WebTV doesn't
possess this feature)
--
squire
Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. (Groucho)
<member@british_expats.com> writes
>Originally posted by Maryanne Kehoe
>> PLONK
>um....what does that mean??
Its a usenet term (usually written as *plonk*) that indicates publicly
that the writer has killfiled the previous poster. Although it sounds
drastic, all that happens is that their newsreader is configured
henceforth not to fetch future articles from that source.
Although Maryanne has been a prolific usenet poster since about 1997 and
has used this term before, she has significantly never explained exactly
how she configures her WebTV to actually do this (hint: WebTV doesn't
possess this feature)
--
squire
Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. (Groucho)
