Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > USA > US Immigration, Citizenship and Visas
Reload this Page >

Pleading to "Minor" Criminal Offenses

Wikiposts

Pleading to "Minor" Criminal Offenses

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 22nd 2010, 4:18 am
  #1  
Account Closed
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 119
SusanPai is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Pleading to "Minor" Criminal Offenses

Pleading Guilty, Not Guilty, Nolo Contendre, Deferred Prosecutions, and Pre Trial Intervention

Under INA Section 101(a)(48)(A) [8 U.S.C.A. Section 1101(a)(48)(A)], a plea of guilty, nolo contendere, or an admission of sufficient facts can result in a "CONVICTION" for immigration purposes.

For example, for minor offenses such as Petit Theft in Duval County, Florida, a deferred prosecution in conjunction with Pre Trial Intervention is sometimes offered as an alternative disposition. However, in other jurisdictions a similar disposition may be considered a "conviction" for immigration purposes. Each case needs to be thoroughly researched for the latest caselaw. In my opinion, a qualified immigration attorney needs to be consulted before a disposition in ANY criminal matter.

The below form PTI is acceptable. However, you should not make an admission of sufficient facts which would otherwise support a finding of guilt. In other jurisdictions, such an admission is often made to the interviewer or on the record contemporaneous with the application for the deferred prosecution. E.g., Mass. R. Crim. P. 12(a)(2) for a specific state plea providing for an admission of “sufficient facts.”

An admission of facts sufficient to support a finding of guilt is a “conviction” for immigration purposes and therefore may render you subject to immigration consequences - even deportation.

Com. V. Duquette, 386 Mass. 834, 438 N.E.2d 334 (1982).

I'm posting this for general information purposes only. Please contact a qualified immigration attorney to answer specific questions about any specific matter.

SusanPai is offline  
Old Apr 22nd 2010, 4:43 am
  #2  
BE Commentator
 
S Folinsky's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 8,472
S Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Pleading to "Minor" Criminal Offenses

Comment: An interesting read on the subject is the March 31, 2010 Supreme Court decision in Padilla v Kentucky. The attorney's action in Padilla was particularly egregious -- but the general discussion in the main opinion and the concurring opinion aptly describe the problems involved.

Moral: Be careful. Be very careful.
S Folinsky is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.