I-93 waiver
#4
Account Closed
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,266
Re: I-93 waiver
Hi:
Still in use. I've seen it used in situations where alien has the wrong visa for what they want to do, but they are otherwise admissible. For example, I handled a case once where husband had had a "I" visa and his spouse had the concomitant spousal "I" visa. She traveled a lot. The last time she used it, she was asked if her husband still worked for the newspaper and she freely disclosed that he still did and proudly mentioned he had been promoted to a senior editorial position back in the home country. Tilt. She was admitted as a "B-2" with the I-193.
I note that the fee is really kind of steep now.
Still in use. I've seen it used in situations where alien has the wrong visa for what they want to do, but they are otherwise admissible. For example, I handled a case once where husband had had a "I" visa and his spouse had the concomitant spousal "I" visa. She traveled a lot. The last time she used it, she was asked if her husband still worked for the newspaper and she freely disclosed that he still did and proudly mentioned he had been promoted to a senior editorial position back in the home country. Tilt. She was admitted as a "B-2" with the I-193.
I note that the fee is really kind of steep now.
#5
Re: I-93 waiver
Hi:
Still in use. I've seen it used in situations where alien has the wrong visa for what they want to do, but they are otherwise admissible. For example, I handled a case once where husband had had a "I" visa and his spouse had the concomitant spousal "I" visa. She traveled a lot. The last time she used it, she was asked if her husband still worked for the newspaper and she freely disclosed that he still did and proudly mentioned he had been promoted to a senior editorial position back in the home country. Tilt. She was admitted as a "B-2" with the I-193.
I note that the fee is really kind of steep now.
Still in use. I've seen it used in situations where alien has the wrong visa for what they want to do, but they are otherwise admissible. For example, I handled a case once where husband had had a "I" visa and his spouse had the concomitant spousal "I" visa. She traveled a lot. The last time she used it, she was asked if her husband still worked for the newspaper and she freely disclosed that he still did and proudly mentioned he had been promoted to a senior editorial position back in the home country. Tilt. She was admitted as a "B-2" with the I-193.
I note that the fee is really kind of steep now.
$545 is not small change
Thanks Mr F
#6
Forum Regular
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: florida
Posts: 173
Re: I-93 waiver
I 193 Very seldom granted and discretionary
#9
Account Closed
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,266
Re: I-93 waiver
I gave an example of a person who landed with the wrong visa but was otherwise clearly admissible. Also, lets say the visa was prima facie valid but had been invalidated as a matter of law because the person had overstayed by one day on a previous stay for reasons beyond their control. Things like that.
#10
Re: I-93 waiver
They seem to be the latest fad with a few members of the E2 crowd. Because of the delays and claimed arbitrary nature of London, one route is to take a B2 visa and then adjust to E2 status whilst here. This seems to work but you still have to go back to London at some time to sort out the visa. So what if you need to leave but don't want to face London? The answer -- it is claimed -- is an I-193! Personally, I think they're probably playing with fire.
#11
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: I-93 waiver
They seem to be the latest fad with a few members of the E2 crowd. Because of the delays and claimed arbitrary nature of London, one route is to take a B2 visa and then adjust to E2 status whilst here. This seems to work but you still have to go back to London at some time to sort out the visa. So what if you need to leave but don't want to face London? The answer -- it is claimed -- is an I-193! Personally, I think they're probably playing with fire.
#13
American Expat
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,598
Re: I-93 waiver
They seem to be the latest fad with a few members of the E2 crowd. Because of the delays and claimed arbitrary nature of London, one route is to take a B2 visa and then adjust to E2 status whilst here. This seems to work but you still have to go back to London at some time to sort out the visa. So what if you need to leave but don't want to face London? The answer -- it is claimed -- is an I-193! Personally, I think they're probably playing with fire.
#14
Re: I-93 waiver
I-193 are supposed to be for unforseen circumstances or emergencies. I agree that counting on one being approved is a bad idea. Someone knowingly seeking admission with the wrong visa type for their intended purpose could end up with a Expedited Removal order and 5 yr bar.
#15
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: I-93 waiver
Something on the lines of that they told the Consulate they wanted a B2 for some other reason, came over and filed for E2 within a few days of arrival, something they had 'forgot' to mention to the Consulate.