E-3 Visa for Australians Thread- It's all in here
#136
Re: E-3 Visa for Australians Thread- It's all in here
I-94 has nothing to do with the validity of your E3 visa. You MUST apply for extension of your E3 regardless of your I-94 expiration.
If your E3/LCA expires Nov 1 2011 and your I-94 expires Nov 1 2012, you still need to apply for E3 extension before Nov 1 2011. And unlike H1, you cannot continue work on E3 until you have your extension approved so you have to apply 6 months in advance if you want to try extending it via uscis.
Consult an attorney if you are unsure.
If your E3/LCA expires Nov 1 2011 and your I-94 expires Nov 1 2012, you still need to apply for E3 extension before Nov 1 2011. And unlike H1, you cannot continue work on E3 until you have your extension approved so you have to apply 6 months in advance if you want to try extending it via uscis.
Consult an attorney if you are unsure.
#137
Re: E-3 Visa for Australians Thread- It's all in here
I-94 has nothing to do with the validity of your E3 visa. You MUST apply for extension of your E3 regardless of your I-94 expiration.
If your E3/LCA expires Nov 1 2011 and your I-94 expires Nov 1 2012, you still need to apply for E3 extension before Nov 1 2011. And unlike H1, you cannot continue work on E3 until you have your extension approved so you have to apply 6 months in advance if you want to try extending it via uscis.
Consult an attorney if you are unsure.
If your E3/LCA expires Nov 1 2011 and your I-94 expires Nov 1 2012, you still need to apply for E3 extension before Nov 1 2011. And unlike H1, you cannot continue work on E3 until you have your extension approved so you have to apply 6 months in advance if you want to try extending it via uscis.
Consult an attorney if you are unsure.
I was hoping that with a still-valid I-94, filing for a new LCA alone will be sufficient, but it sounds like a USCIS petition is also needed as well. Whatever's the case, when the time comes I'll be contacting the legal representative here anyway, and see what they say.
#138
Just Joined
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3
Re: E-3 Visa for Australians Thread- It's all in here
Just wondering if anyone has any experience with applying for an E3 without a bachelors degree.
I do not have a bachelors but I do have 12 years or so work experience in my industry and am definitely a specialist working in IT.
As I understand it a specialty occupation for the E3 visa really becomes a role which requires specialized knowledge that can be obtained either by you having a Bachelors Degree or enough relevant work experience.
Any help appreciated.
I do not have a bachelors but I do have 12 years or so work experience in my industry and am definitely a specialist working in IT.
As I understand it a specialty occupation for the E3 visa really becomes a role which requires specialized knowledge that can be obtained either by you having a Bachelors Degree or enough relevant work experience.
Any help appreciated.
#139
Forum Regular
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 87
Re: E-3 Visa for Australians Thread- It's all in here
Forget the I-94, your LCA/E3 validity period is what matters. Visa is simply an entry document and has nothing to do with your legal status within US. When you extend your E3 within the US, it keeps you in legal status and gets you a new I-94 with that extension.
When you leave and want to return after you have extended your E3 with uscis you will still have to apply for a new visa although you have extended your E3 already. For an H1 it is called visa stamping but for E3 it is a fresh i.e. new application to enter the US just like you had to do when you first went for a visa.
Hope this makes it clear for everyone and ends the I-94 confusion!
When you leave and want to return after you have extended your E3 with uscis you will still have to apply for a new visa although you have extended your E3 already. For an H1 it is called visa stamping but for E3 it is a fresh i.e. new application to enter the US just like you had to do when you first went for a visa.
Hope this makes it clear for everyone and ends the I-94 confusion!
Last edited by nani; Mar 31st 2011 at 3:10 am.
#141
Just Joined
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3
Re: E-3 Visa for Australians Thread- It's all in here
I have to renew mine and my dependents (wife and two children) E3 visas. For some reason we only received a 12mth visa? although our I-94 is for 2 years..
Anyway, it appears it would be cheaper for us to leave the country (Canada?) and reapply rather than extend/renew? I am having trouble finding the black and white facts but from my reading in here it appears that re-applying altogether is the fastest, cheapest process. Even though I will remain with the same employer.
My main question is whether I can reapply for a new e3visa with the old e3 still current and in my passport?? Will this be problematic? I am really concerned as I obviously cannot afford the risk of not getting back into the country (with the family and finances) so I am trying to preempt any potential issues.
Any advice/ help would REALLY be appreciated!
Thanks in advance!
Dean.
Anyway, it appears it would be cheaper for us to leave the country (Canada?) and reapply rather than extend/renew? I am having trouble finding the black and white facts but from my reading in here it appears that re-applying altogether is the fastest, cheapest process. Even though I will remain with the same employer.
My main question is whether I can reapply for a new e3visa with the old e3 still current and in my passport?? Will this be problematic? I am really concerned as I obviously cannot afford the risk of not getting back into the country (with the family and finances) so I am trying to preempt any potential issues.
Any advice/ help would REALLY be appreciated!
Thanks in advance!
Dean.
#142
Re: E-3 Visa for Australians Thread- It's all in here
Anyway, it appears it would be cheaper for us to leave the country (Canada?) and reapply rather than extend/renew? I am having trouble finding the black and white facts but from my reading in here it appears that re-applying altogether is the fastest, cheapest process. Even though I will remain with the same employer.
#143
Just Joined
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3
Re: E-3 Visa for Australians Thread- It's all in here
Thanks so much for your quick reply Lifehouse. So, reapplying with a current e3 in my passport would not be an issue? I mean I just want to get up there and do it before the visa expires in june..thoughts?
#144
Re: E-3 Visa for Australians Thread- It's all in here
I actually don't know the answer to that, and I'm curious myself too. Let's see what other people think. My feeling is that if you apply pretty close to the visa expiration date, the U.S. consulate will understand why you're doing that.
#145
Just Joined
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3
Re: E-3 Visa for Australians Thread- It's all in here
Anyone else out there with any thoughts? or facts?
Your time is appreciated.
Dean.
Your time is appreciated.
Dean.
#146
Forum Regular
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 210
Re: E-3 Visa for Australians Thread- It's all in here
My main question is whether I can reapply for a new e3visa with the old e3 still current and in my passport?? Will this be problematic? I am really concerned as I obviously cannot afford the risk of not getting back into the country (with the family and finances) so I am trying to preempt any potential issues.
Presuming your new visa is with the same company (and I think in the same role) then technically you're classified as an "E3R", where the R stands for renewal. There's no real difference, except that the E3R's don't count against the annual quote of E3's that can be issued.
#147
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,157
Re: E-3 Visa for Australians Thread- It's all in here
A question regarding E-3 vs H-1B (sorry, this is a bit of a 'spoilt for choice' non-issue.)
I'm setting up arrangements for a new job and I have been given a choice between a new E-3 or an H-1B. It seems like no contest except:
Phew...
This seems to point me toward an H-1B, since I could get 3 years and not have to worry about proving home ties (though this has never been questioned.) Is there anything I am missing here??
I'm setting up arrangements for a new job and I have been given a choice between a new E-3 or an H-1B. It seems like no contest except:
- I have no dependents
- I won't be paying for any part (and the employer doesn't mind the costs of a petition)
- I have no immigrant intent BUT already have 3 years of E-3(R) behind me
- it's an academic job, so no H quotas/time restrictions
- this only has to be sorted out by mid-August and I will be in Oz to apply.
Phew...
This seems to point me toward an H-1B, since I could get 3 years and not have to worry about proving home ties (though this has never been questioned.) Is there anything I am missing here??
#148
Re: E-3 Visa for Australians Thread- It's all in here
I agree that H-1B is better in your case, because it will give you a 3-year duration for work and the visa application fee is much cheaper nowadays than E-3. Only drawback I can see is H-1B has a max duration of 6 years, after which you need to leave the U.S. for at least a year before coming back for another H-1B. If you're planning on working for the company for a very long term, H-1B won't be ideal unless a concurrent employment based PR petition is also filed.
#149
Forum Regular
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 87
Re: E-3 Visa for Australians Thread- It's all in here
Ian, you have a great deal of immigration knowledge but I kindly beg to differ on this: Visa is only an entry/travel document into the US. The reason why you can remain within the US even though your visa expires is because you have filed and received an extension with your new LCA with the USCIS. So once you are in the US visa does not determine your legal status but you need to file and receive an extension with the USCIS before your LCA/I-94 expires.
#150
Account Closed
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 38,865
Re: E-3 Visa for Australians Thread- It's all in here
I think therein lies the discrepancy You were talking about extending status and I was talking about entering the US - for which purpose, I'm sure you'll agree, the visa is vitally important vis-a-vis status!
Ian