Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > USA > US Immigration, Citizenship and Visas
Reload this Page >

Child born after immigrant visas issued but before entry

Wikiposts

Child born after immigrant visas issued but before entry

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 13th 2011, 7:09 am
  #1  
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,759
GeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond repute
Default Child born after immigrant visas issued but before entry

I asked this as part of another thread but didn't get any answers. My wife is pregnant and due in September. My visa application has reached the NVC and given average timescales, we could be having the interview and visas issued in July/August. We're planning on entering the US in November. At that rate, we'll have visas but the baby won't.

I thought this would be a reasonably common situation but I can't find much at all on the subject. Plenty about the medical itself with pregnancy but not the visa part.

The only things I've seen with any substance are:
1. Wait for the baby to be born before going for the interview.
-or-
2. You can enter the US with a newborn without a visa subject to the situation above and long form birth certificates etc (and some words were quoted from some CBP manual but without section numbers etc)

I don't know if it's possible to stop the NVC ball rolling with #1. And #2 seems very dubious - albeit authoritative - unless I can find something written somewhere.

Any more ideas?
GeoffM is offline  
Old Apr 13th 2011, 7:29 am
  #2  
MODERATOR
 
Noorah101's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 58,687
Noorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond reputeNoorah101 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Child born after immigrant visas issued but before entry

Are either you or your wife a USC?

Rene
Noorah101 is offline  
Old Apr 13th 2011, 8:49 am
  #3  
BE Commentator
 
S Folinsky's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 8,474
S Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Child born after immigrant visas issued but before entry

Originally Posted by GeoffM
I asked this as part of another thread but didn't get any answers. My wife is pregnant and due in September. My visa application has reached the NVC and given average timescales, we could be having the interview and visas issued in July/August. We're planning on entering the US in November. At that rate, we'll have visas but the baby won't.

I thought this would be a reasonably common situation but I can't find much at all on the subject. Plenty about the medical itself with pregnancy but not the visa part.

The only things I've seen with any substance are:
1. Wait for the baby to be born before going for the interview.
-or-
2. You can enter the US with a newborn without a visa subject to the situation above and long form birth certificates etc (and some words were quoted from some CBP manual but without section numbers etc)

I don't know if it's possible to stop the NVC ball rolling with #1. And #2 seems very dubious - albeit authoritative - unless I can find something written somewhere.

Any more ideas?
I have not looked it up recently -- however, the answer is somewhere in the regulations.
S Folinsky is offline  
Old Apr 14th 2011, 9:41 am
  #4  
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,759
GeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Child born after immigrant visas issued but before entry

Originally Posted by S Folinsky
the answer is somewhere in the regulations.
With all due respect, that's pretty much a statement of the bleeding obvious. What I was hoping to find out was where that statement was written. In fairness to you, it's clearly not as common as I thought - despite the medical xray/vaccination issue being widely reported which I would have thought would go hand-in-hand.
GeoffM is offline  
Old Apr 14th 2011, 10:55 am
  #5  
BE Commentator
 
S Folinsky's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 8,474
S Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Child born after immigrant visas issued but before entry

Originally Posted by GeoffM
With all due respect, that's pretty much a statement of the bleeding obvious. What I was hoping to find out was where that statement was written. In fairness to you, it's clearly not as common as I thought - despite the medical xray/vaccination issue being widely reported which I would have thought would go hand-in-hand.
Be nice. The Immigration & Nationality Act and the Regulations are on the USCIS web site. FYI, the person in the 50's who drafted the regulations to comply with the then new 1952 Act did everyone a BIG favor -- the regulatory section numbers match the section number of the Immigration & Nationality Act.

Out of idle curiosity, I looked the answer to your question. I did not remember the answer, but I found it quite easily. Sometimes things are hidden in the mumbo jumbo -- but this was not one of the times.

There, not only did I alert you to the issue, I have now suggested where you might look for an answer.

Good luck.

BTW, you are welcome.
S Folinsky is offline  
Old Apr 14th 2011, 11:12 am
  #6  
Concierge
 
Rete's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 46,476
Rete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Child born after immigrant visas issued but before entry

Originally Posted by S Folinsky
Be nice.
BTW, you are welcome.

He was nice and responded in kind to a response that was unhelpful and unnecessary. If you don't want to help answer a question, why respond at all.
Rete is offline  
Old Apr 14th 2011, 4:48 pm
  #7  
BE Commentator
 
S Folinsky's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 8,474
S Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Child born after immigrant visas issued but before entry

Originally Posted by Rete
He was nice and responded in kind to a response that was unhelpful and unnecessary. If you don't want to help answer a question, why respond at all.
Rete: Please take a second look. He clearly responded to my notation and no one else. You know well that there are many things which are not easily discerned from the Act and regulations. OP's question is one of those exceptions.

It is a common mantra in this forum that a person can do it themselves with patience and careful research. I happen to agree with this -- and besides, it is empowering to an applicant to be able to do this. If someone wants to be spoon-fed or does not want to be bothered, that is their prerogative -- but I do ask that they not be rude.
S Folinsky is offline  
Old Apr 14th 2011, 8:15 pm
  #8  
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,759
GeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Child born after immigrant visas issued but before entry

Originally Posted by Rete
He was nice and responded in kind to a response that was unhelpful and unnecessary. If you don't want to help answer a question, why respond at all.
I read Mr Folinsky's post last night, was about to reply, but thought I'd better sleep on it in case I'd missed something obvious. Thank you Rete, it wasn't me then.

Originally Posted by S Folinsky
The Immigration & Nationality Act and the Regulations are on the USCIS web site. FYI, the person in the 50's who drafted the regulations to comply with the then new 1952 Act did everyone a BIG favor -- the regulatory section numbers match the section number of the Immigration & Nationality Act.

Out of idle curiosity, I looked the answer to your question. I did not remember the answer, but I found it quite easily. Sometimes things are hidden in the mumbo jumbo -- but this was not one of the times.

There, not only did I alert you to the issue, I have now suggested where you might look for an answer.
Well, yes, it narrows it down to half a million words. Even the table of contents runs to 9 pages. Clearly I'm unable to utter the magic incantation to find the right words within that text - and equally clearly you do, so can you please narrow it down for me?

Originally Posted by S Folinsky
BTW, you are welcome.
I always thank people for their help. You can see that in my other threads.

Originally Posted by S Folinsky
It is a common mantra in this forum that a person can do it themselves with patience and careful research. I happen to agree with this -- and besides, it is empowering to an applicant to be able to do this. If someone wants to be spoon-fed or does not want to be bothered, that is their prerogative -- but I do ask that they not be rude.
I fully agree - which is how I was able to find those two possibilities in my original post, something I wouldn't have done had I not bothered to do a lot of research beforehand.
GeoffM is offline  
Old Apr 15th 2011, 1:22 am
  #9  
BE Commentator
 
S Folinsky's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 8,474
S Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Child born after immigrant visas issued but before entry

Originally Posted by GeoffM

Well, yes, it narrows it down to half a million words. Even the table of contents runs to 9 pages. Clearly I'm unable to utter the magic incantation to find the right words within that text - and equally clearly you do, so can you please narrow it down for me?
<sigh> Your point is well taken. That said, my memory of the law is more in the sense of "I know generally where it is" and "That one is easy or hard to find." In regards your original question, the top of my head said that it was one of those easy to find. I just did not recall the specifics.

So, as a figurative exercise for the student, I will note that you have posed a question about the documentation necessary for admission as an immigrant. Just looking at the table of contents, you will see that most of the Immigration & Nationality Act does not apply to you.

I make it a practice to look first to the Act and the concomitant regulations on any particular question. To be honest, I find this to be quite effective in dealing with immigration officials -- it is amazing how many times they don't know what is there in open sight! But I digress.

That said, I will give you a hint -- section 211. Note the headings. That is how I looked it up and my memory was confirmed on the general idea that it was "easy."

Good luck.
S Folinsky is offline  
Old Apr 15th 2011, 1:51 am
  #10  
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,759
GeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Child born after immigrant visas issued but before entry

Originally Posted by S Folinsky
That said, I will give you a hint -- section 211
Thank you, with that pointer I was able to find it. For anybody coming across this in the future (after checking it's still current), the following may be useful:

Sec. 211. [8 U.S.C. 1181]

(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) and subsection (c) no immigrant shall be admitted into the United States unless at the time of application for admission he (1) has a valid unexpired immigrant visa or was born subsequent to the issuance of such visa of the accompanying parent, and (2) presents a valid unexpired passport or other suitable travel document, or document of identity and nationality, if such document is required under the regulations issued by the Attorney General.
GeoffM is offline  
Old Apr 15th 2011, 10:07 am
  #11  
crg
American Expat
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,598
crg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Child born after immigrant visas issued but before entry

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/87519.pdf

9 FAM 42.1 N1 GENERAL
(CT:VISA-1173; 03-30-2009)
The regulations of the Attorney General contained in 8 CFR 211.1(b) (see 9
FAM 42.1 Exhibit I) relating to waivers of documentary requirements for
immigrants provide for admission of certain aliens without visas. An
unexpired immigrant visa (IV), reentry permit, or other valid entry
document is required of an immigrant under INA 212(a)(7) except as
indicated below.
9 FAM 42.1 N1.1 Child Born After Issuance of Visa
to Parent
(CT:VISA-1173; 03-30-2009)
The child born after the issuance of a visa to a parent is not required to have
a visa if the child is:
(1) Born subsequent to issuance of an IV to the accompanying parent
within the validity of the parent’s immigrant visa and the child is
entitled to derivative status; or
(2) Born during the permanent resident mother’s temporary visit
abroad provided that (see 9 FAM 42.1 N2):
(a) Admission is within two years of birth; and
(b) Either accompanying parent is applying for readmission upon
first return after the birth of the child.
crg is offline  
Old Apr 15th 2011, 11:28 am
  #12  
BE Commentator
 
S Folinsky's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 8,474
S Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Child born after immigrant visas issued but before entry

Originally Posted by GeoffM
I don't know if it's possible to stop the NVC ball rolling with #1. And #2 seems very dubious - albeit authoritative - unless I can find something written somewhere.
Please forgive me, my inner child wants to say "told you so."

I saw both of my girls today.
S Folinsky is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.