um.....

Thread Tools
 
Old May 9th 2011, 12:34 am
  #16  
Bob
BE Site Lead
 
Bob's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 92,170
Bob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: um.....

On the plus side, if the cards do get made and sent out, they can fetch a pretty penny from the dodgy geezer down the pub
Bob is offline  
Old May 9th 2011, 2:24 am
  #17  
crg
American Expat
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,598
crg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: um.....

Originally Posted by JAJ
I can't speak for the USA specifically, but in most common law jurisdictions the courts would take a dim view of this kind of action (retrospective voiding of something obtained in good faith), even if an immigration or other benefit occurred due to a procedural irregularity. And USCIS might not wish to advertise the fact it made a mistake.

But I'd agree that if they wanted to use the green cards, they should get some very good legal advice on this subject. I'd think the problem in this case is that USCIC were probably never advised of the departure from the USA.
I see where you are coming from. The first entry would be more perilous as the burden of proof is squarely upon the alien to prove their admissibility. Once within the US after being admitted, the odds get better.

I wouldn't expect CIS/ICE/CBP etc to just stipulate that the cards were obtained in good faith. They could just as easily take a position that the cards were fraudulently obtained. Any competent immigration attorney should know that departing with a pending I-485 and without an advanced parole (not including dual intent H/L or similar) causes the I-485 application to be abandoned. They have an attorney. The government may assume that the attorney and therefore the bearer knew the cards were not properly obtained. It would make for an interesting read if it went through the court system.

I'm sure you're aware of plenty of people who have applied to renew a US passport only to be told they are not a US citizen and the first passport was a mistake. I know of several. None of them have gotten any traction by claiming they acted in good faith.
crg is offline  
Old May 9th 2011, 9:28 am
  #18  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: London
Posts: 1,248
Marocco has a reputation beyond reputeMarocco has a reputation beyond reputeMarocco has a reputation beyond reputeMarocco has a reputation beyond reputeMarocco has a reputation beyond reputeMarocco has a reputation beyond reputeMarocco has a reputation beyond reputeMarocco has a reputation beyond reputeMarocco has a reputation beyond reputeMarocco has a reputation beyond reputeMarocco has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: um.....

Originally Posted by JAJ
I can't speak for the USA specifically, but in most common law jurisdictions the courts would take a dim view of this kind of action (retrospective voiding of something obtained in good faith), even if an immigration or other benefit occurred due to a procedural irregularity. And USCIS might not wish to advertise the fact it made a mistake.
I remember a court case cited by Mr Folinsky (can't remember the reference). It involved a Mexican LPR who had lost his green card. When he applied for a replacement, the government decided that his green card had been granted in error. If I remember correctly, he lost the case and had to leave the US.

Last edited by Marocco; May 9th 2011 at 9:45 am.
Marocco is offline  
Old Dec 13th 2011, 6:28 pm
  #19  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 68
Sazzer is a jewel in the roughSazzer is a jewel in the roughSazzer is a jewel in the roughSazzer is a jewel in the roughSazzer is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: um.....

GeeandTee sent you a pm
Sazzer is offline  
Old Dec 13th 2011, 6:52 pm
  #20  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 38,865
ian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: um.....

Originally Posted by Sazzer
GeeandTee sent you a pm
The OP has not posted since May 7... so don't expect a response.

Ian
ian-mstm is offline  
Old Dec 13th 2011, 7:00 pm
  #21  
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
 
geeandtee's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Back in the UK!
Posts: 1,097
geeandtee has a reputation beyond reputegeeandtee has a reputation beyond reputegeeandtee has a reputation beyond reputegeeandtee has a reputation beyond reputegeeandtee has a reputation beyond reputegeeandtee has a reputation beyond reputegeeandtee has a reputation beyond reputegeeandtee has a reputation beyond reputegeeandtee has a reputation beyond reputegeeandtee has a reputation beyond reputegeeandtee has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: um.....

Originally Posted by ian-mstm
The OP has not posted since May 7... so don't expect a response.

Ian
Eeee, I still have email notification set up.

Message received and responded to.

And Hi, long time no see.
geeandtee is offline  
Old Dec 13th 2011, 8:52 pm
  #22  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 928
Squirrel is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: um.....

Just curious, but in this situation will visiting the US be possible or will a B visa be required?
Squirrel is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.