um.....
#16
Re: um.....
On the plus side, if the cards do get made and sent out, they can fetch a pretty penny from the dodgy geezer down the pub
#17
American Expat
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,598
Re: um.....
I can't speak for the USA specifically, but in most common law jurisdictions the courts would take a dim view of this kind of action (retrospective voiding of something obtained in good faith), even if an immigration or other benefit occurred due to a procedural irregularity. And USCIS might not wish to advertise the fact it made a mistake.
But I'd agree that if they wanted to use the green cards, they should get some very good legal advice on this subject. I'd think the problem in this case is that USCIC were probably never advised of the departure from the USA.
But I'd agree that if they wanted to use the green cards, they should get some very good legal advice on this subject. I'd think the problem in this case is that USCIC were probably never advised of the departure from the USA.
I wouldn't expect CIS/ICE/CBP etc to just stipulate that the cards were obtained in good faith. They could just as easily take a position that the cards were fraudulently obtained. Any competent immigration attorney should know that departing with a pending I-485 and without an advanced parole (not including dual intent H/L or similar) causes the I-485 application to be abandoned. They have an attorney. The government may assume that the attorney and therefore the bearer knew the cards were not properly obtained. It would make for an interesting read if it went through the court system.
I'm sure you're aware of plenty of people who have applied to renew a US passport only to be told they are not a US citizen and the first passport was a mistake. I know of several. None of them have gotten any traction by claiming they acted in good faith.
#18
BE Forum Addict
Joined: May 2007
Location: London
Posts: 1,248
Re: um.....
I can't speak for the USA specifically, but in most common law jurisdictions the courts would take a dim view of this kind of action (retrospective voiding of something obtained in good faith), even if an immigration or other benefit occurred due to a procedural irregularity. And USCIS might not wish to advertise the fact it made a mistake.
Last edited by Marocco; May 9th 2011 at 9:45 am.
#22
Account Closed
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 928
Re: um.....
Just curious, but in this situation will visiting the US be possible or will a B visa be required?