Proper Englishish..
#1
Joined on April fools day
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2012
Location: 30 miles from a decent grocery store.
Posts: 10,642
Proper Englishish..
Ain't: am not, or are not, or is not.
#2 have not or has not. I think it should be hain't.
What are your favorite massacres of am/english?
Ain't - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
#2 have not or has not. I think it should be hain't.
What are your favorite massacres of am/english?
Ain't - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
Last edited by Beaverstate; Apr 10th 2015 at 12:24 pm.
#4
Re: Proper Englishish..
I just want to scream "NO YOU COULDN'T"
Also 'addicting' really really grates on my nerves even though I think it's actually acceptable English. "Ooh these chocolates are so addicting." no they ain't they are bloody ADDICTIVE.
Also 'addicting' really really grates on my nerves even though I think it's actually acceptable English. "Ooh these chocolates are so addicting." no they ain't they are bloody ADDICTIVE.
#6
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: Charlotte,NC
Posts: 1,717
Re: Proper Englishish..
Gotten! I know it is a past participle but it is just plain ugly and over used here.
Also my friend often says to me - I'll carry you to the mall! Really what all the way?!! And the other one - make a picture instead of take a photo!
Also my friend often says to me - I'll carry you to the mall! Really what all the way?!! And the other one - make a picture instead of take a photo!
#8
Re: Proper Englishish..
I hate this too! I feel it's a back-formation because the contraction of "could have"-- i.e. "could've"-- is so misunderstood (or misheard?)....
I always want to correct it, and have to constantly bite my tongue so I don't come across as a pedant.
I always want to correct it, and have to constantly bite my tongue so I don't come across as a pedant.
#9
Heading for Poppyland
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: North Norfolk and northern New York State
Posts: 14,532
Re: Proper Englishish..
"Ain't" and "gotten" were of course common in British usage in the eighteenth century and earlier. Like many words and usages, they persist in America long after mostly disappearing in Britain.
#10
Re: Proper Englishish..
One is an ugly contraction, the other is merely a past participle that fell out of use in the UK and is considered to be archaic or obsolete.
#13
Re: Proper Englishish..
Burglarize.
Yes, I know it's a legitimate word, and probably at least as old a word as "burgle" - both verbs are formed from the much older nouns burglar (the perpetrator) and burglary (the act perpetrated) but to my ears it just sounds ridiculous. Worse still is the occasionally-heard "burglarizer" or "burglarization" instead of burglar and burglary. Eugh.
Yes, I know it's a legitimate word, and probably at least as old a word as "burgle" - both verbs are formed from the much older nouns burglar (the perpetrator) and burglary (the act perpetrated) but to my ears it just sounds ridiculous. Worse still is the occasionally-heard "burglarizer" or "burglarization" instead of burglar and burglary. Eugh.
#15