![]() |
Minimum wage
Seattle set a minimum wage of $15 per hour regardless of age, experience or usefulness. I think it may be a tad high for someone pumping gas etc..
Also should minimum wage be expected to be a living wage, regardless of the value of the labor?, as in return on investment (wage). |
Re: Minimum wage
Originally Posted by Beaverstate
(Post 11325880)
Seattle set a minimum wage of $15 per hour regardless of age, experience or usefulness. I think it may be a tad high for someone pumping gas etc..
Also should minimum wage be expected to be a living wage, regardless of the value of the labor?, as in return on investment (wage). We'll know the answer from the seattle experiment soon..... |
Re: Minimum wage
Originally Posted by steveq
(Post 11325884)
We'll know the answer from the seattle experiment soon.....
After Sea Tac and Seattle, opening a McD's in Fife may be a sound idea. |
Re: Minimum wage
In my opinion, $15 is too high and it probably should be in the $10-$12 range. $15 is $31,200 annually and that is not far below medium income.
In the 1980s, France cut the maximum hours to create more jobs but it had the opposite effect and reduced the number of people employed as costs rose. Then France significantly increased the minimum wage and employment dropped further as costs rose further and employers cut costs by hiring less people. Although the medium income in France is currently above the UK, the gdp per capita and medium family income are both significantly below the UK because the workforce participation rate is 53% compared to 63% in the UK. Another issue is job dissatisfaction in France is lower than the UK since a very high percentage of employees are working for minimum wage with a perception of a dead end job. Therefore in my opinion, raising the minimum wage too much can have a severe adverse effect on the economy. |
Re: Minimum wage
I agree that $15 is too much - I think $10 would be reasonable.
|
Re: Minimum wage
Originally Posted by Michael
(Post 11325990)
.... Another issue is job dissatisfaction in France is lower than the UK since a very high percentage of employees are working for minimum wage with a perception of a dead end job. ...
No matter what level the MW is set at, more effort needs to be put into training people to get them off MW jobs. Rather like unemployment pay, MW jobs should be seen as a safety net and a stepping stone to better work, not a long term career choice. |
Re: Minimum wage
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11326052)
Sury you mean "higher"? ..... I read that too, that to keep total payroll costs under control, employers reduced the pay for more experienced staff, so promotions for more responsibility do not give much more pay.
A person that works at or near minimum wage for their entire lifetime may not have a feeling of self worthiness. Nobody wants to be at the bottom of the food chain during their entire life. |
Re: Minimum wage
Originally Posted by Michael
(Post 11326062)
Job satisfaction has been said to be lower since about 20% of the French workforce is working at minimum wage and even if they are promoted, they still work at or near minimum wage. I suspect that is one of the reasons that Americans tend to have a more positive attitude about work since a minimum wage job is considered short term and temporary and even though they may eventually only make $15-$16 per hour, they feel they accomplished something since that wage is double the minimum wage. It's mostly a matter of perception.
A person that works at or near minimum wage for their entire lifetime may not have a feeling of self worthiness. |
Re: Minimum wage
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11326083)
OK, agreed on all the above, .... but you said DISsatisfaction!
|
Re: Minimum wage
OTOH wages below living wage result in the employer being subsidised by the taxpayer as the employees get tax credits for low incomes, have to claim food stamps etc to make ends meet. Why should my taxes subsides the Waltons' failure to pay their employees properly?
|
Re: Minimum wage
Originally Posted by rpjs
(Post 11326145)
OTOH wages below living wage result in the employer being subsidised by the taxpayer as the employees get tax credits for low incomes, have to claim food stamps etc to make ends meet. Why should my taxes subsides the Waltons' failure to pay their employees properly?
|
Re: Minimum wage
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 11326206)
Agreed. $8/hr is nowhere near a living wage where I am.
|
Re: Minimum wage
I did read something about it.
Will not come all of a sudden, takes a long time. Obviously it is not just the increase to $15, everything else that is an add on goes up as well. There some things you can do operationally, much more careful with your scheduling, split shifts etc If you are for example in the food business you can buy more in pre prepared, cut out labour intensive procedures as far as possible. Obviously you have a good reason to increase your prices. Presumably for say construction companies it depends where your business is located rather than the construction site? Could the same thing work for labour masters? |
Re: Minimum wage
Originally Posted by Michael
(Post 11326086)
Oops.:o
|
Re: Minimum wage
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 11326206)
Agreed. $8/hr is nowhere near a living wage where I am.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 10:47 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.