I may live in New York, but I’d be lost without the NHS
https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...-us-healthcare
After 10 years in the US, I also think of British bureaucracy as a soft touch, its officiousness – that nasal ring of “I’m sorry, madam” of a thousand comedy sketches – underscored by a basic decency that can be negotiated with and ultimately circumvented, in contrast to the armed and crew-cut American version. And all right, the class system is entrenched; but at least we acknowledge that it’s unfair, rather than embracing the rampant individualism of the US, in which one’s station in life is assumed to be a result of one’s efforts. And yet in all of these things, I am clearly both cosseted and hopelessly out of date. Talking to my dad about healthcare the other day, I said, as I always do, that the ultimate health insurance for Britons living in the US is knowing we can come home for NHS treatment. My dad looked alarmed and asked if my daughters have NHS numbers, to which I laughed incredulously and said: “No, but what are they going to do, turn us away?” |
Re: I may live in New York, but I’d be lost without the NHS
At least some of the commenters put her right.
|
Re: I may live in New York, but I’d be lost without the NHS
I guess I shouldn't be surprised that someone who is intelligent enough to write for a national newspaper, doesn't know about the NHS. OH hang on it is the Guardian.
|
Re: I may live in New York, but I’d be lost without the NHS
Whatever happened to that proposal to give ex-pats access to the NHS if they'd paid in sufficient NICs?
|
Re: I may live in New York, but I’d be lost without the NHS
BTW we were visiting the UK a couple of years ago and OH had to get some medication prescribed, so we went to an NHS walk-in centre. When she gave her name and birthdate her NHS records from when she'd lived in the UK came up, and the staff all but encouraged her to claim she was still living in the UK to avoid the non-resident's consultation charge. As it was only about £40 we were happy to pay it.
|
Re: I may live in New York, but I’d be lost without the NHS
Originally Posted by rpjs
(Post 12464329)
Whatever happened to that proposal to give ex-pats access to the NHS if they'd paid in sufficient NICs?
|
Re: I may live in New York, but I’d be lost without the NHS
National insurance is for your pension and dole. NHS funded from general taxation.
|
Re: I may live in New York, but I’d be lost without the NHS
Originally Posted by rpjs
(Post 12464329)
Whatever happened to that proposal to give ex-pats access to the NHS if they'd paid in sufficient NICs?
Seriously - Just look at the ridiculous inequalities in state pension provision if abroad [now wheres my winter fuel allowance, it gets bloody cold in the tropics...] |
Re: I may live in New York, but I’d be lost without the NHS
NB When it was introduced, NI was specifically to fund the nhs, but these days, like all taxation, it just goes into the govt pot the be distributed as our lords and masters see fit. There has been talk of course, an extra penny on tax to fund the nhs properly - yeah - and road tax fixes roads :-)
|
Re: I may live in New York, but I’d be lost without the NHS
guardian online is pure clickbait.
"reporters" given a day to "research" and write an article and expected to write x many articles per month or they lose the gig. I wonder if she realises how she comes across? |
Re: I may live in New York, but I’d be lost without the NHS
Originally Posted by petitefrancaise
(Post 12464722)
guardian online is pure clickbait.
"reporters" given a day to "research" and write an article and expected to write x many articles per month or they lose the gig. I wonder if she realises how she comes across? |
Re: I may live in New York, but I’d be lost without the NHS
NICS are not connected to NHS entitlement. This is a common misundersytanding and is related to the way the system was run more than 100years ago when the Lloyd George Government introduced National Insurance, modelled on the German system introduced under Bismarck.
Does no one learn anything about NICS at school ? I know the answer to that question ! |
Re: I may live in New York, but I’d be lost without the NHS
Originally Posted by scot47
(Post 12464737)
NICS are not connected to NHS entitlement. This is a common misundersytanding and is related to the way the system was run more than 100years ago when the Lloyd George Government introduced National Insurance, modelled on the German system introduced under Bismarck.
Does no one learn anything about NICS at school ? I know the answer to that question ! |
Re: I may live in New York, but I’d be lost without the NHS
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12464281)
Talking to my dad about healthcare the other day, I said, as I always do, that the ultimate health insurance for Britons living in the US is knowing we can come home for NHS treatment. My dad looked alarmed and asked if my daughters have NHS numbers, to which I laughed incredulously and said: “No, but what are they going to do, turn us away?”
Most of us wouldn't need this because the system would show recent interaction with other UK medical professionals such as a GP. |
Re: I may live in New York, but I’d be lost without the NHS
Originally Posted by DaveLovesDee
(Post 12464748)
I attended a Parliamentary meeting about healthcare and migrants in Portcullis House a few years back, and one of the subjects was health tourism. Apparently the nationality by far of those entering the UK for medical treatment then returning to their country of residence are UK ex-pats. These should be charged as foreign visitors but rarely are because those responsible for requesting payment don't ask for evidence of entitlement such as a recent letter.
Most of us wouldn't need this because the system would show recent interaction with other UK medical professionals such as a GP. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 4:43 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.