Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > USA > The Trailer Park
Reload this Page >

Going to be a hot night in Ferguson

Going to be a hot night in Ferguson

Old Dec 17th 2014, 3:51 pm
  #1021  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,865
Giantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Going to be a hot night in Ferguson

Originally Posted by Boiler
She is a nut job. Nuff said.
Yeh, I agree. There was an article in the Washington Post immediately after the grand jury testimony was released about this "witness's" testimony. It's hard to believe that the grand jury did anything but bin it, let alone have it have any influence on their discussions. The only question I have is why did the prosecutor even bother to give the grand jury her testimony? I guess he didn't want to leave himself open to any suggestion of bias, so just dumped literally everything on the grand jury's lap.

Last edited by Giantaxe; Dec 17th 2014 at 3:53 pm.
Giantaxe is offline  
Old Dec 17th 2014, 4:04 pm
  #1022  
 
Pulaski's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Dixie, ex UK
Posts: 52,439
Pulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Going to be a hot night in Ferguson

Originally Posted by Giantaxe
..... The only question I have is why did the prosecutor even bother to give the grand jury her testimony? I guess he didn't want to leave himself open to any suggestion of bias, so just dumped literally everything on the grand jury's lap.
That's pretty much how GJs work - the DA wants to wash his hands of the decision to prosecute or drop any case which is tenuous and/or contentious, so dumps everything in the laps of the grand jurors and leaves it up to them to decide. Any case for which the basis is more clear cut is usually taken to a preliminary hearing before a judge.
Pulaski is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.