Flight Costs - Hmmm.
#16
Re: Flight Costs - Hmmm.
Only another Freddie Laker will change things. Virgin doesn't undercut anyone, they're just another airline fleecing their passengers, except they pack more passengers in than the others.
Last edited by Pulaski; Jan 9th 2015 at 3:04 pm.
#17
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2014
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 317
Re: Flight Costs - Hmmm.
Slightly OT, but I remember the day Skytrain went t*ts up. It was early '82 IIRC. I was travelling back from the US to the UK with my mum and sis. We always did standby and we got caught up in the chaos in Miami for 2 days! Ended up flying 1st Class on Air Belguim via Geneva and Brussels - pretty cool when you're 10!
#18
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,759
Re: Flight Costs - Hmmm.
I recommended a friend go on Oasis Air (I think it was called) who did LGW-HKG flights. We'd been on them twice (4 flights) and they were great - a low cost, long haul airline. Unfortunately fuel costs going up wiped them out, and my friend was on what became the last LGW-HKG flight - announced as they were coming in to land at HKG. He had to make his own way back home again at great cost, and couldn't for a few days because all the airlines were fully booked. Not the best advice I ever gave somebody!
Our first flight on Oasis was routed via southern Europe, Georgia, India, up into China, and then back down again to Hong Kong - because Russia hadn't yet granted an overfly license. Took about 14 hours instead of the 12 that route should take, via Moscow usually.
Our first flight on Oasis was routed via southern Europe, Georgia, India, up into China, and then back down again to Hong Kong - because Russia hadn't yet granted an overfly license. Took about 14 hours instead of the 12 that route should take, via Moscow usually.
#19
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: Atlanta via Dubai, Belgium, Greece, Saudi Arabia
Posts: 953
Re: Flight Costs - Hmmm.
I saw this in the Daily Fail the other day showing the breakdown of taxes and fees that make up a LHR - JFK flight
Infographic reveals true cost of a transatlantic flight | Daily Mail Online
Infographic reveals true cost of a transatlantic flight | Daily Mail Online
#20
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,759
Re: Flight Costs - Hmmm.
I saw this in the Daily Fail the other day showing the breakdown of taxes and fees that make up a LHR - JFK flight
Infographic reveals true cost of a transatlantic flight | Daily Mail Online
Infographic reveals true cost of a transatlantic flight | Daily Mail Online
Last edited by GeoffM; Jan 11th 2015 at 4:28 am.
#21
Re: Flight Costs - Hmmm.
I myself believe that UK air passenger duty is outrageous and probably the reason why, according to yesterday's paper, most Chinese tourists shun the UK for other destinations.
Those traveling to the USA pay proportionally most. A flights to Oz is over 3 times as far but those going to Oz do not pay £450 APD.
Those traveling to the USA pay proportionally most. A flights to Oz is over 3 times as far but those going to Oz do not pay £450 APD.
#22
Forum Regular
Joined: Jun 2012
Location: Boston
Posts: 62
Re: Flight Costs - Hmmm.
Boston-London prices have skyrocketted - last year, an expensive summer ticket was 1200-1400, off-season under $1000. Now direct flights are $1700-1900, and without a Sat night stopover, around $2600!! (bringing back the Sat. night hurdle is an old airline trick to catch business travelers, but that had mostly disappeared till now). This is despite strong dollar and very low fuel prices, which alone should reduce costs by 15-20%. Main cause, I think, is that American no longer has its own flights to LHR, all operated by BA, so closer to a monopoly, and down to 4 instead of 6 flights a day.
#23
Re: Flight Costs - Hmmm.
I just got flights on Aer Lingus Boston-Dublin-Manchester (same price for Heathrow) for $980 per person leaving June 16th and staying over a Sat night.
#24
Forum Regular
Joined: Jun 2012
Location: Boston
Posts: 62
Re: Flight Costs - Hmmm.
and Wow, an Icelandic discount airline, has started flights (from March 2015) Boston (also Baltimore) to Gatwick with Reykjavik stopover, but apart from a few much publicized $200 fares, flights are around $1000 over the summer. With narrow body planes, and steep charges for anything more than 5kg of hand-luggage.
#25
Account Closed
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
Re: Flight Costs - Hmmm.
If you don't like the price, don't buy the ticket.
I always find it amusing when people wan't to fly during peak times, and are surprised fares are higher then other times.
Using random dates in June (1st and 15th) and cheapest flight option via MSP, I get total price of 2199 US which is only about 27 cents per mile (using great circle mapper and nautical miles) which is fairly decent price when broken down per mile.
I have no clue what Delta's cost per passenger per mile is, but it's probably not a huge profit for them.
I've paid more per mile on a short 1,500 mile trip.
Lower fuel prices have no real bearing on fares, an airline isn't going to just reduce fares because their costs went down if they can charge more, why charge less if the market is willing to pay more?
Last edited by scrubbedexpat091; Jan 12th 2015 at 1:41 am.
#26
Re: Flight Costs - Hmmm.
They are not getting away with anything. Airlines can only charge what people are willing to pay, if people are paying the offered fares, then the market is priced accurately.
If you don't like the price, don't buy the ticket.
I always find it amusing when people wan't to fly during peak times, and are surprised fares are higher then other times.
Using random dates in June (1st and 15th) and cheapest flight option via MSP, I get total price of 2199 US which is only about 27 cents per mile (using great circle mapper and nautical miles) which is fairly decent price when broken down per mile.
I have no clue what Delta's cost per passenger per mile is, but it's probably not a huge profit for them.
I've paid more per mile on a short 1,500 mile trip.
Lower fuel prices have no real bearing on fares, an airline isn't going to just reduce fares because their costs went down if they can charge more, why charge less if the market is willing to pay more?
If you don't like the price, don't buy the ticket.
I always find it amusing when people wan't to fly during peak times, and are surprised fares are higher then other times.
Using random dates in June (1st and 15th) and cheapest flight option via MSP, I get total price of 2199 US which is only about 27 cents per mile (using great circle mapper and nautical miles) which is fairly decent price when broken down per mile.
I have no clue what Delta's cost per passenger per mile is, but it's probably not a huge profit for them.
I've paid more per mile on a short 1,500 mile trip.
Lower fuel prices have no real bearing on fares, an airline isn't going to just reduce fares because their costs went down if they can charge more, why charge less if the market is willing to pay more?
There are certain routes and airports in the US with limited, if any, competition. A few years ago Mrs P tried to fly to the far end of NC and could only find tickets for $800 when $1,000-$1,100 could have got her a flight to London! Such prices are not fair, reasonable, or competitive but reflect airline stranglehold on some routes.
#27
Account Closed
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
Re: Flight Costs - Hmmm.
That's all well and good if there is plenty of competition, but on international routes the flights are heavily regulated, and an increasing number of airports are effectively "full", with no more slots available, or gates for new entrants either for that matter, so when there is more demand but no way to increase supply, prices will and do rise above the competitive "cost plus fair profit" that economics predicts for an open and competitive market.
There are certain routes and airports in the US with limited, if any, competition. A few years ago Mrs P tried to fly to the far end of NC and could only find tickets for $800 when $1,000-$1,100 could have got her a flight to London! Such prices are not fair, reasonable, or competitive but reflect airline stranglehold on some routes.
There are certain routes and airports in the US with limited, if any, competition. A few years ago Mrs P tried to fly to the far end of NC and could only find tickets for $800 when $1,000-$1,100 could have got her a flight to London! Such prices are not fair, reasonable, or competitive but reflect airline stranglehold on some routes.
If there was demand there would be more competition. There is generally a reason why airports have only 1 airline.
#28
Re: Flight Costs - Hmmm.
and Wow, an Icelandic discount airline, has started flights (from March 2015) Boston (also Baltimore) to Gatwick with Reykjavik stopover, but apart from a few much publicized $200 fa res, flights are around $1000 over the summer. With narrow body planes, and steep charges for anything more than 5kg of hand-luggage.
#30
Account Closed
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
Re: Flight Costs - Hmmm.
If your near Canada at all, specifically New Foundland, Air Canada I believe still has a non-stop to London, and I think Westjet is going to have seasonal flights to Scotland from there as well but not 100% when it starts or the specifics.
Last edited by scrubbedexpat091; Jan 13th 2015 at 5:32 pm.