California fires
#17
Re: California fires
I guess there must be many dead and fallen trees that are extremely dry. That would be the priority to clear. Maybe thus tragedy will focus minds.
#18
Re: California fires
Experts point to a century’s worth of fire suppression as one factor in allowing forests to build up a dangerous amount of flammable material. Tom Bonnicksen, a retired forestry and wildfire expert who spent years researching fires in California, told The Chronicle that forests around Paradise contained about 2,000 trees per acre when he studied the area about a decade ago. A healthy forest should have between 60 and 80 trees per acre, he said.
#19
Re: California fires
That and the existing trees are simply too densely packed.
https://www.sfchronicle.com/californ...t-13380388.php
https://www.sfchronicle.com/californ...t-13380388.php
#20
Heading for Poppyland
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: North Norfolk and northern New York State
Posts: 14,540
#21
Heading for Poppyland
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: North Norfolk and northern New York State
Posts: 14,540
Re: California fires
That and the existing trees are simply too densely packed.
https://www.sfchronicle.com/californ...t-13380388.php
https://www.sfchronicle.com/californ...t-13380388.php
I wonder how they count those trees per acre? I have about 100 -120 trees per acre, if you count just mature trees. But if you count saplings of various sizes (i.e. ones small enough to cut down with a bow saw) there are probably over a thousand per acre. I don't really see how you can generalise about forestry management, with all the different terrain types, drainage patterns, species mixes, not to mention economic priorities. (Are the trees a cash crop? Etc.)
#22
Re: California fires
I wonder how they count those trees per acre? I have about 100 -120 trees per acre, if you count just mature trees. But if you count saplings of various sizes (i.e. ones small enough to cut down with a bow saw) there are probably over a thousand per acre. I don't really see how you can generalise about forestry management, with all the different terrain types, drainage patterns, species mixes, not to mention economic priorities. (Are the trees a cash crop? Etc.)
#24
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: California fires
I have thought of buying say 5 acres of pine, I mainly get aspen as it is easier and local. I get through 12 to 15 cords a years and by my calculations 5 acres would give me an everlasting supply.
If I get a FS permit costs $20 a cord but seems many just get one..., and you can not go more that 15ft? off a road, which would not be so bad if they had not closed most of the roads so making it impractical, they also limit you to 10 cords, I think the local National Forest is over a million acres.
I remember going to Shiloh many moons ago, they moved whole armies through the forest, it was difficult for an individual to get through, small fires cleared the undergrowth.
If I get a FS permit costs $20 a cord but seems many just get one..., and you can not go more that 15ft? off a road, which would not be so bad if they had not closed most of the roads so making it impractical, they also limit you to 10 cords, I think the local National Forest is over a million acres.
I remember going to Shiloh many moons ago, they moved whole armies through the forest, it was difficult for an individual to get through, small fires cleared the undergrowth.
#25
Re: California fires
I have thought of buying say 5 acres of pine, I mainly get aspen as it is easier and local. I get through 12 to 15 cords a years and by my calculations 5 acres would give me an everlasting supply.
If I get a FS permit costs $20 a cord but seems many just get one..., and you can not go more that 15ft? off a road, which would not be so bad if they had not closed most of the roads so making it impractical, they also limit you to 10 cords, I think the local National Forest is over a million acres.
I remember going to Shiloh many moons ago, they moved whole armies through the forest, it was difficult for an individual to get through, small fires cleared the undergrowth.
If I get a FS permit costs $20 a cord but seems many just get one..., and you can not go more that 15ft? off a road, which would not be so bad if they had not closed most of the roads so making it impractical, they also limit you to 10 cords, I think the local National Forest is over a million acres.
I remember going to Shiloh many moons ago, they moved whole armies through the forest, it was difficult for an individual to get through, small fires cleared the undergrowth.
#26
Heading for Poppyland
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: North Norfolk and northern New York State
Posts: 14,540
Re: California fires
Hmm when we first moved here we used to get through 20 cords a year. That was just partially heating a four bedroom house. (We now just use 2 or 3 cords a year, relying primarily on oil for heating.)
#29
Heading for Poppyland
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: North Norfolk and northern New York State
Posts: 14,540
Re: California fires
In many vegetation zones, if you neglect a piece of land, it will be covered in trees and underbrush in a surprisingly short space of time. After a few years go by, it will be a very expensive proposition to clear the trees, as contractors with specialist equipment will be needed. What I see in both New York State and England is some house lots, small or large, absolutely choked with trees right up to the building. With hindsight, the homeowner could have mowed, pruned, used a bowsaw - but now it is much too late. These may be poor people, or elderly. And of course it is not just your own house that is in danger if there is a fire, but all your neighbours. Now where I am, northern NYS, forest fires spreading like in the Camp Fire is not a major issue - it rains heavily, all the bloody time, except when it is snowing. England has much less rain, but for some reason a little bit damp sometimes. California, I don't know whether towns and counties impose limits on trees and brush on house lots and other non-forest lots?
#30
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: California fires
I am not at risk, 4? blocks away.
No need for an escape route, I am at the edge of a wide valley.
There was a big fore 20 miles to the South, only ones near me have been grass fires which are relatively easily put out.