2020 Election
#1156
Heading for Poppyland
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: North Norfolk and northern New York State
Posts: 14,540
Re: 2020 Election
The other issue of course is his sexual orientation. I've been in California long enough to learn a little about Hispanics. The great majority are Catholic and believe in the teachings of that church which kind of places him in a negative light among that group perhaps even among African Americans for that matter.
I know a lot of Catholics, in fact a couple of good friends from university days are very senior apparatchiks in Rome. I’d say a lot of Catholics are very liberal, and barely pay lip service to church teachings that don’t fit with their worldview.
#1157
Re: 2020 Election
That's rather a strange attitude. When you see what must be thousands of Catholics from all over the world packed in like sardines to see the Pope when he appears in public could be representative of the fact that the greatest majority of Catholics worldwide do believe and follow his teachings. Of course I may be failing to take into account that "American independence of thought" that makes them take a different attitude. Anyway I look at it from the point of view of a university student who decides to leave a class because he or she does not believe in the Professor's approach and method of teaching the major he or she is studying... why waste anymore time on it? Just walk away !
For most Catholics it is a cultural trait, who walks away from a culture?
Most people get culture and religion from family, core values can change with life experience, but our core cultural identity usually stays with us for life. Most Catholics don't care what the Pope says, they form their own values, whilst still retaining a cultural respect for the Pope.
I am an Atheist, but I still see that culturally I still have Catholic traits.
#1158
Banned
Joined: Dec 2015
Location: california
Posts: 6,035
Re: 2020 Election
Why go to the huge effort of walking away, when you don't have any skin in the game of actual religious beliefs?
For most Catholics it is a cultural trait, who walks away from a culture?
Most people get culture and religion from family, core values can change with life experience, but our core cultural identity usually stays with us for life. Most Catholics don't care what the Pope says, they form their own values, whilst still retaining a cultural respect for the Pope.
I am an Atheist, but I still see that culturally I still have Catholic traits.
For most Catholics it is a cultural trait, who walks away from a culture?
Most people get culture and religion from family, core values can change with life experience, but our core cultural identity usually stays with us for life. Most Catholics don't care what the Pope says, they form their own values, whilst still retaining a cultural respect for the Pope.
I am an Atheist, but I still see that culturally I still have Catholic traits.
Last edited by dc koop; Nov 21st 2019 at 4:47 pm.
#1159
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: 2020 Election
Biden looked a bit wobbly, maybe because he has just found out he has a grandchild?
#1160
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 10,006
Re: 2020 Election
#1161
Re: 2020 Election
I really wish the media would stop trying to make Klobuchar a thing. Klobuchar is never going to be a thing. Her ultimate "No we can't!" message just isn't going to win many supporters regardless of how much the media try and help her.
Joe Biden is slightly different with his "This is America, we can do anything! Except pass any meaningful progressive legislation. Also did he forget that Kamala Harris was Black, female or a Senator? Either way it wasn't a good look. He would get destroyed by Trump, but he still some how keeps his high ratings in the polls.
Mayo Pete was his usual weaselly self of sounding very erudite and above the fray, but not actually saying anything of substance. I did notice that Tulsi Gabbard got under his skin a little at the end when directly quoting something he said about sending troops to Mexico and he tried to spin it as something different.
Kamala finally got in her attack on Tulsi Gabbard only about three months after Tulsi attacked her.
Liz was rather anonymous.
Booker was good again, but again it won't make a difference in the polls.
Yang was an interesting contrast to some of the other candidates, with a different perspective on some issues, and he also had some good humour.
Bernie was good, talked about changing foreign policy in a good way and humanizing Palestinians which no-one else did. Strong on climate change and the urgency required. He even talked about himself and his life, which I think will help him with a certain section of the voters.
Steyer was there.
The moderators and their questions were terrible as usual.
Joe Biden is slightly different with his "This is America, we can do anything! Except pass any meaningful progressive legislation. Also did he forget that Kamala Harris was Black, female or a Senator? Either way it wasn't a good look. He would get destroyed by Trump, but he still some how keeps his high ratings in the polls.
Mayo Pete was his usual weaselly self of sounding very erudite and above the fray, but not actually saying anything of substance. I did notice that Tulsi Gabbard got under his skin a little at the end when directly quoting something he said about sending troops to Mexico and he tried to spin it as something different.
Kamala finally got in her attack on Tulsi Gabbard only about three months after Tulsi attacked her.
Liz was rather anonymous.
Booker was good again, but again it won't make a difference in the polls.
Yang was an interesting contrast to some of the other candidates, with a different perspective on some issues, and he also had some good humour.
Bernie was good, talked about changing foreign policy in a good way and humanizing Palestinians which no-one else did. Strong on climate change and the urgency required. He even talked about himself and his life, which I think will help him with a certain section of the voters.
Steyer was there.
The moderators and their questions were terrible as usual.
#1162
Re: 2020 Election
Why do they need to? I'd wager that the biggest moral issue for many American Catholics at the moment is child sexual abuse by priests.
https://www.americamagazine.org/fait...rtion-and-lgbt
I'm married to an American Catholic. She gives very little store to the pope's views.
https://www.americamagazine.org/fait...rtion-and-lgbt
I'm married to an American Catholic. She gives very little store to the pope's views.
#1165
Re: 2020 Election
Oh by the way , all the above is Fake News & a conspiracy made up be the Democrats.
#1166
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: 2020 Election
https://variety.com/2019/tv/news/tv-...es-1203411983/
So that explains the lack of comments, hardly anybody watched it.
According to data measured by Nielsen, the cable-news outlet’s telecast captured just 6.5 million viewers overall and a little more than 1.67 million among viewers between 25 and 54, the demographic coveted most by advertisers in news content. The totals would make the event one of the least-watched in the recent cycle of five Democratic debates that have been offered by the Democratic National Committee in 2019.
#1167
Re: 2020 Election
Plus Fox News has been telling people not to watch it because they have realised that people actually like the things that the Democrats have been saying and don't want to give them ideas. Harder to control the narrative if the audience is actually informed and engaged. For the same reason they have been telling their audience not to watch the bribery witnesses, claiming it is boring and about nothing, when really they don't want people to see how every witness is confirming that Trump was committing bribery.
#1168
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: 2020 Election
I think people are a bit tired of politics right now with the Trump bribery case on tv every week day for the last few weeks.
Plus Fox News has been telling people not to watch it because they have realised that people actually like the things that the Democrats have been saying and don't want to give them ideas. Harder to control the narrative if the audience is actually informed and engaged. For the same reason they have been telling their audience not to watch the bribery witnesses, claiming it is boring and about nothing, when really they don't want people to see how every witness is confirming that Trump was committing bribery.
Plus Fox News has been telling people not to watch it because they have realised that people actually like the things that the Democrats have been saying and don't want to give them ideas. Harder to control the narrative if the audience is actually informed and engaged. For the same reason they have been telling their audience not to watch the bribery witnesses, claiming it is boring and about nothing, when really they don't want people to see how every witness is confirming that Trump was committing bribery.
Never occurred to me that so many who would be interested in watching the Dem debates do watch Fox and would be so influenced by them.
#1169
Re: 2020 Election
I would think the intersection of Fox News watchers and Democratic Debate watchers is practically zero.