![]() |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by amideislas
(Post 11822872)
So you're the only man on the planet the doesn't look at (and fantasise) EVERY female ass on the street? (unless, of course, you aren't interested in the opposite sex).
OK, well whatever. You are unique at least. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by amideislas
(Post 11822872)
So you're the only man on the planet the doesn't look at (and fantasise) every female ass on the street? (unless, of course, you aren't interested in the opposite sex).
Originally Posted by amideislas
(Post 11822872)
I wonder then, why so many women are so concerned with, and go to such lengths to make their derrière look as good as possible. Might they understand you better than you do?
Originally Posted by amideislas
(Post 11822872)
OK, well whatever. You are unique at least.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by amideislas
(Post 11822872)
So you're the only man on the planet the doesn't look at (and fantasise) every female ass on the street? (unless, of course, you aren't interested in the opposite sex).
I wonder then, why so many women are so concerned with, and go to such lengths to make their derrière look as good as possible. Might they understand you better than you do? OK, well whatever. You are unique at least. As for how Bill could hurt Hillary's campaign, it's very simple. If she plays the woman card, she'll be hit with the fact that she managed the "bimbo eruptions" defence - where she engineered the public destruction of every woman who came forth to accuse him of improper behaviour. And then she has the gall to state that women who are the victims of rape or other similar improper behaviour should be believed. The Republican candidate's campaign against her would be better focused on her total ineptitude as Secretary of State and that she pushed Obama into the policy that brought down Gaddafi and left Libya as a dangerous failed state - as simply one example of her lack of competence to be President - and there are many more. Further, to highlight her propensity to lie and mislead, as when she met the families of the Bengazi dead and blamed the video when she knew and had emailed the President of Libya that it was a pure terrorist attack. Save the bimbo crap as a counter, and let her know it's there if she plays the other card. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
(Post 11822962)
I don't think The Sultan is unique. I have seen more than my share of female arses, both in my office and on the street. Far too many of them are immense, and covered with lycra pants so tight that you can see every dimple of cellulite from the waistband to the ankles. It can turn your stomach - and I don't know how those pants could be anywhere near as comfortable as a skirt or dress that would camouflage what the world shouldn't see. Personally, I appreciate a nice 36 C chest.
As for how Bill could hurt Hillary's campaign, it's very simple. If she plays the woman card, she'll be hit with the fact that she managed the "bimbo eruptions" defence - where she engineered the public destruction of every woman who came forth to accuse him of improper behaviour. And then she has the gall to state that women who are the victims of rape or other similar improper behaviour should be believed. The Republican candidate's campaign against her would be better focused on her total ineptitude as Secretary of State and that she pushed Obama into the policy that brought down Gaddafi and left Libya as a dangerous failed state - as simply one example of her lack of competence to be President - and there are many more. Further, to highlight her propensity to lie and mislead, as when she met the families of the Bengazi dead and blamed the video when she knew and had emailed the President of Libya that it was a pure terrorist attack. Save the bimbo crap as a counter, and let her know it's there if she plays the other card. The second paragraph outlines exactly what I was talking about. Implicate Hillary in the mess surrounding Bill's philandering. I get the strategy. I just wonder if it will work on swing voters. Or does it just work on the people that already believe it? |
Re: 2016 Election
I would participate in this conversation but somebody reminded me that females have buttocks and now I am just a hot mess. :nod:
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by username.exe
(Post 11822977)
I would participate in this conversation but somebody reminded me that females have buttocks and now I am just a hot mess. :nod:
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 11822973)
Your first paragraph made me laugh. :lol: Glad you joined us in the devolution into filth.
Would it work with the independents/undecided/fence sitters to point out that she ran the "bimbo eruptions" defence and thus paint her as a hypocrite - if she plays the woman card? I don't think it would hurt to use it at that time. Otherwise steer clear. The election will probably be more affected by the economy, if it sinks next year. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
(Post 11822998)
It's where I belong, Leslie.:o
Would it work with the independents/undecided/fence sitters to point out that she ran the "bimbo eruptions" defence and thus paint her as a hypocrite - if she plays the woman card? I don't think it would hurt to use it at that time. Otherwise steer clear. The election will probably be more affected by the economy, if it sinks next year. I am asking, in earnest, how does Hillary navigate the "woman" thing? You have answered as to what your response to her would be and I don't think it's a particularly unusual position among voters. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 11823003)
The election should be about the economy --- all elections should really. It could also be about security, specially if all of the murder/death/kill stuff keeps up at this rate.
I am asking, in earnest, how does Hillary navigate the "woman" thing? You have answered as to what your response to her would be and I don't think it's a particularly unusual position among voters. You mentioned Obama declining to address racial motives behind attacks on him in his election ultimately being a successful tactic. Let me ask you this: will female voters be more inclined to vote for Hillary because of her gender, or not? |
Re: 2016 Election
Trump just talks like a half cocked red neck loudmouth. If he didn't plaster his fake hair down with heavy duty female hair spray he'd look like a Cone head in a high wind
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
(Post 11822920)
Every arse? No, only the nice ones. I also stare at big knockers and dribble lightly, too ... :blink:
Every single woman is not squatting daily just so I can store an image of their arse in the visual wank bank. A lot of them have arses that are utterly unappealing to me. No I'm not. I'm quite standard, actually. Good guess on me being an arse man though. I like big butts, I cannot lie. With respect to Bill, no doubt he shares the very same instinct that you and all men share. The difference is the resistance to temptation. Bill obviously failed at that, and the consequences are a matter of history. But Hillary needs to avoid playing the "sexism" card, not only because it's beneath a commander and chief, but it's not what the focus of the campaign should be. If she wins the office, that alone will speak volumes about women's roles in society. |
Re: 2016 Election
Speaking of arses, I'm not quite sure which of the present two front runners is the biggest.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by amideislas
(Post 11823121)
Well, there you go. Seems you aren't unique after all. You seem to have it down to an art.
Since I'm married, that just doesn't tend to come from home as much as I'd like it to. But that's why we have internet porn.
Originally Posted by amideislas
(Post 11823121)
With respect to Bill, no doubt he shares the very same instinct that you and all men share. The difference is the resistance to temptation. Bill obviously failed at that, and the consequences are a matter of history.
But Hillary needs to avoid playing the "sexism" card, not only because it's beneath a commander and chief, but it's not what the focus of the campaign should be. If she wins the office, that alone will speak volumes about women's roles in society. I agree that Hillary needs to avoid the sexism argument, in the same way Obama played down the race angle. She has enough going for her that has gained her the support she has without having to do that.
Originally Posted by Dick Dasterdly
(Post 11823134)
Speaking of arses, I'm not quite sure which of the present two front runners is the biggest.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 11823003)
The election should be about the economy --- all elections should really. It could also be about security, specially if all of the murder/death/kill stuff keeps up at this rate.
I am asking, in earnest, how does Hillary navigate the "woman" thing? You have answered as to what your response to her would be and I don't think it's a particularly unusual position among voters. When she goes in front of the audience and the cameras, people can see she's a woman, and there is a certain irreducible number of women who would vote for her solely on the basis that she, along with them, has ovaries. If Trump, or the R candidate raises it, she gets an add-on sympathy vote from yet more women, some of them even independents who might not otherwise vote. Here's what Trump's done: http://www.toilette-humor.com/christ...balloons.shtml |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Dick Dasterdly
(Post 11823134)
Speaking of arses, I'm not quite sure which of the present two front runners is the biggest.
Trump, no contest. He wears a suit immaculately tailored to attempt to hide all the bulk, never fastening his jacket as another means of camouflaging the gut. Just another clue to the extent of the man's vanity. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 8:18 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.