2016 Election
Banned
Joined: Dec 2015
Location: california
Posts: 6,035
Re: 2016 Election
I guess we can both agree a change in both attitudes and priorities are necessary, though I would add in the teacher unions as well. However the dumbing down of America from the education system I believe will be the Achille's heal of American economic performance in the long term. The government,politicians and unions are all to blame for accepting low educational standards. I doubt much will change though.
I think kids get too much time off school. It seems hardly a week goes by without minimum days (teacher- parent conferences) and do they need a whole week off for Thanksgiving? When our late and unlamented Governor Arnold Schwarzennegger finished his term the State's finances were so bad that all school districts were required to close the schools periodically for one day. The length of summer breaks is ridiculous. One month would be adequate enough. Lost time in class adds up to hundreds of hours a year and dumping extra homework on students to make up for it doesn't work.
All this could be rectified with co-operation of unions and officials all the way up from local to federal level and a return to the essential basics of sound educational practices
From my own personal experience private schools don't always deserve the positive image they seem to enjoy. My daughter attended a private non-denominational Christian school from age five up to middle school grade. We enrolled her there because my wife and I both had to work and the school provided child care facilities at additional cost of course. When it came time for her to go into 7th grade at middle school we pulled her out from the private school and enrolled her in one of the local middle schools. While not behind scholastically in her new school she was certainly not ahead either.
Private schools are only as good as the salaries and benefits they can afford to pay their staff and not all of them are rolling in money either. I think politicians like Betsy DeVos see them only through blinkers.
Last edited by dc koop; Nov 27th 2016 at 6:42 pm.
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: 2016 Election
I know there are issues in Denver etc where the governing bodies are elected and the Teacher Unions spend a lot of time and effort ensuring that those voted in are friendly.
Should the governing bodies have the best interests of the children or teachers at heart?
Should the governing bodies have the best interests of the children or teachers at heart?
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 10,006
Re: 2016 Election
I certainly don't blame the unions. They exist to work for better benefits and working conditions for their members. One of the reasons for the decline of the earning power of the middle class is the fall in union membership and the rise of right to work laws which only benefit the employer and increase their bottom line.
I think kids get too much time off school. It seems hardly a week goes by without minimum days (teacher- parent conferences) and do they need a whole week off for Thanksgiving? When our late and unlamented Governor Arnold Schwarzennegger finished his term the State's finances were so bad that all school districts were required to close the schools periodically for one day. The length of summer breaks is ridiculous. One month would be adequate enough. Lost time in class adds up to hundreds of hours a year and dumping extra homework on students to make up for it doesn't work.
All this could be rectified with co-operation of unions and officials all the way up from local to federal level and a return to the essential basics of sound educational practices
From my own personal experience private schools don't always deserve the positive image they seem to enjoy. My daughter attended a private non-denominational Christian school from age five up to middle school grade. We enrolled her there because my wife and I both had to work and the school provided child care facilities at additional cost of course. When it came time for her to go into 7th grade at middle school we pulled her out from the private school and enrolled her in one of the local middle schools. While not behind scholastically in her new school she was certainly not ahead either.
Private schools are only as good as the salaries and benefits they can afford to pay their staff and not all of them are rolling in money either. I think politicians like Betsy DeVos see them only through blinkers.
I think kids get too much time off school. It seems hardly a week goes by without minimum days (teacher- parent conferences) and do they need a whole week off for Thanksgiving? When our late and unlamented Governor Arnold Schwarzennegger finished his term the State's finances were so bad that all school districts were required to close the schools periodically for one day. The length of summer breaks is ridiculous. One month would be adequate enough. Lost time in class adds up to hundreds of hours a year and dumping extra homework on students to make up for it doesn't work.
All this could be rectified with co-operation of unions and officials all the way up from local to federal level and a return to the essential basics of sound educational practices
From my own personal experience private schools don't always deserve the positive image they seem to enjoy. My daughter attended a private non-denominational Christian school from age five up to middle school grade. We enrolled her there because my wife and I both had to work and the school provided child care facilities at additional cost of course. When it came time for her to go into 7th grade at middle school we pulled her out from the private school and enrolled her in one of the local middle schools. While not behind scholastically in her new school she was certainly not ahead either.
Private schools are only as good as the salaries and benefits they can afford to pay their staff and not all of them are rolling in money either. I think politicians like Betsy DeVos see them only through blinkers.
I agree with you about private schools that they are not necessarily better academically, and since they often follow the state curriculum sometimes just the same. However I note, as in most of your posts, you appear to think money is the issue for better educational standards- many teachers I have met in private schools earn less money than public school teachers, but want out of the bureaucracy or dealing with unruly children without standards.
I am unsure what the unions and local officials could do to improve standards since there is a perverse incentive for them to continue the system,- less accountability ( except excessive silly testing some states enforce upon them) since hard to get fired, an ideology so stringent that free speech and initiative frowned upon, and their excellent pensions and vacation time.
I am generalizing as of course there are some excellent public school teachers.
Parent teacher conferences can often be a joke. Parents feel they are "involved" and go often just to hear a lot of nice things, so they feel good. Maybe if they didn't give their children cell phones or computers, watched their diet better, and had real consequences for bad grades ( if the school gives bad grades) they would be better parents than going to conferences.
I don't remember having less time in school but I do remember being expected to learn. English not my strongest class by far, yet what we were expected to have read by the time of graduation was a lot more than student today. (Many text books now look like websites with "pop-up" smatterings of this or that).
I cant see any harm and much benefit in vouchers. If the public school administrators and teachers so proud of their performance they wouldn't fear vouchers.
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 10,006
Re: 2016 Election
I remember many years ago in California in an area it was found than unknown alternative administrative body had been set up through some addition to legislation, but apparently no one in the local school districts amongst parents and some teachers knew about it. This group was reviewing policies and procedures received from the state , then would send them back to the state, which would then send them for review to the "official" administrative body which was located in the same district, which would then send the policies back to the state.
Local public teachers I hear in conversations whining about their salaries yet hard to see how if they got a 5 or 10% raise how that would make them teach differently.
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 302
Re: 2016 Election
The teachers are just protecting their interests, which are not the same as the students, so the situation you mention is part of how things have become as they are.
I remember many years ago in California in an area it was found than unknown alternative administrative body had been set up through some addition to legislation, but apparently no one in the local school districts amongst parents and some teachers knew about it. This group was reviewing policies and procedures received from the state , then would send them back to the state, which would then send them for review to the "official" administrative body which was located in the same district, which would then send the policies back to the state.
Local public teachers I hear in conversations whining about their salaries yet hard to see how if they got a 5 or 10% raise how that would make them teach differently.
I remember many years ago in California in an area it was found than unknown alternative administrative body had been set up through some addition to legislation, but apparently no one in the local school districts amongst parents and some teachers knew about it. This group was reviewing policies and procedures received from the state , then would send them back to the state, which would then send them for review to the "official" administrative body which was located in the same district, which would then send the policies back to the state.
Local public teachers I hear in conversations whining about their salaries yet hard to see how if they got a 5 or 10% raise how that would make them teach differently.
Paying the teachers less than public school teachers, because good teachers don't need to be paid well?
Crumbly building and less access to "gadgets" like computers and microscopes or science labs. Because all the things aren't required.
Asian and Indian families are moving into my area where the public schools are considered excellent, because generally the parents tend to value a good education.
Account Closed
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
Re: 2016 Election
I would hope the education system has improved since the 80's and 90's but doesn't seem it has in some areas.
I know from my high school education, the teachers were crap for the most part, teaching was not high on their list of things to do. I graduated nowhere near a level where university was an option, I wasn't even prepared for community college level classes.
But the teachers of my school were all 2-3 years away from retirement, most having been at the school since the 1960's, and were likely burned out and just waiting to collect their retirement checks.
I know from my high school education, the teachers were crap for the most part, teaching was not high on their list of things to do. I graduated nowhere near a level where university was an option, I wasn't even prepared for community college level classes.
But the teachers of my school were all 2-3 years away from retirement, most having been at the school since the 1960's, and were likely burned out and just waiting to collect their retirement checks.
Banned
Joined: Dec 2015
Location: california
Posts: 6,035
Re: 2016 Election
From what I remember of my daughter,s years at the private parochial school she was well up on the bible and prayers but was lacking in knowledge of our Constitution, the Amendments and the functions of the different branches of government. Any time spent on religion in the classroom is a waste of time. I'm not anti-religion, just believe that it should be confined to where it belongs, inside the four walls of a church. Why would a government be interested in providing vouchers for a private parochial school?
This is sneaky Evangelicalism sticking it's nose into where it doesn't belong. I wonder if non-Christian private schools. ie Muslim for example will qualify for vouchers ?
This is sneaky Evangelicalism sticking it's nose into where it doesn't belong. I wonder if non-Christian private schools. ie Muslim for example will qualify for vouchers ?
Last edited by dc koop; Nov 28th 2016 at 12:19 am.
Re: 2016 Election
https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/802972944532209664
So Trump is saying the election is invalid. Seems like a full recount is needed.
So Trump is saying the election is invalid. Seems like a full recount is needed.
Re: 2016 Election
Are these tweet things real? Are they him ? Or part of his entourage?
Seems a most bizarre way to carry on to me.
Seems a most bizarre way to carry on to me.
Re: 2016 Election
Perhaps right. I do remember Balmedie and what he did and has done to what was that very special area, the village and the people.
I don't really bother with twitter so the idea of a grown man ranting via twitter is pathetic to me. Mind you I say that , his rants and wants hurt people.
I don't really bother with twitter so the idea of a grown man ranting via twitter is pathetic to me. Mind you I say that , his rants and wants hurt people.
Heading for Poppyland
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: North Norfolk and northern New York State
Posts: 14,540
Re: 2016 Election
I cannot believe trump is now taking this line. He's not only bizarre but he's profoundly stupid. God help America.
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 10,006
Re: 2016 Election
From what I remember of my daughter,s years at the private parochial school she was well up on the bible and prayers but was lacking in knowledge of our Constitution, the Amendments and the functions of the different branches of government. Any time spent on religion in the classroom is a waste of time. I'm not anti-religion, just believe that it should be confined to where it belongs, inside the four walls of a church. Why would a government be interested in providing vouchers for a private parochial school?
This is sneaky Evangelicalism sticking it's nose into where it doesn't belong. I wonder if non-Christian private schools. ie Muslim for example will qualify for vouchers ?
This is sneaky Evangelicalism sticking it's nose into where it doesn't belong. I wonder if non-Christian private schools. ie Muslim for example will qualify for vouchers ?
As far as your opinion that religion in school is a waste of time that of course is a debatable opinion- the point of vouchers is the freedom to chose what is best by parents. Judging from parochial schools I have experience of, the results on the children certainly more positive than what I saw in public schools.
Each parochial school is different- for example there is a vast difference in many Catholic and Episcopal parochial schools than schools run by evangelical denominations. The vouchers can be used for a whole variety of private schools. In a nearby city there is a bi-lingual school, a school for artistic children that definitely is to the left of even the public schools, and I am unaware of any voucher system that restricts use of vouchers to any particular religion or denomination.
Two schools of which I had children in, one Catholic and one Episcopal, followed state curriculums- and for students to participate in requirements for in-state tuition etc, had to take certain courses and take certain tests. Since the schools generally performed better than public schools, hardly were they deficient in the areas you mention. Briefly one child of ours was in a Baptist school, they definitely inserted religion in every class and were a bit extreme, on the other hand students were very well-behaved, disciplined, and the school had few drug and alcohol problems. That school was safe and generally academic standards no worse than public schools.
I cant believe in a free and caring society that when an opportunity is presented for parents to choose a school that may have better academic quality, or is safer or better socially, or suits the ideology the parents believe in, that parents shouldn't have he opportunity to choose what is best for their children.