UK immigration post Brexit
#781
So long...










Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 22,468












Sometimes, even Tories can be decent human beings with empathy.
#782

I imagine it might actually be quite painful for you to have to accept that some of what you latecomers are now spouting as reasons for curbing immigration have been griped about for a lot longer than you are prepared to acknowledge and have long been argued by many of those on the political left.
Whilst it affords you a modicum of protection against the charges you don't want levelled against you, I don't suppose it has struck you how hypocritical it is of you to don in part the apparel of those you would normally accuse of being liberal lefty, hand-wringing, virtue-signalling SJWs (did I forget anything there? Are blue hair, beards and nose rings part of the usual spiel or are they for something different?).
#783

It was pandering. Randomly plucking 20,000 people from a different part of the world and bringing them to the west just because their own country is in a mess isn't showing compassion. It's showing weakness and stupidity.
#784
#785

And you're going to have to wake up to the fact that the foreign policy of the UK and others are often what has led to countries being in a mess and that they must bear some of the responsibility for that. Instead of having constant snide digs at people who go on protest marches etc, perhaps you ought to think about joining in a bit next time a government of ours starts rattling sabres and agitating for military intervention abroad.
#786
Reasonable Bitch










Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Mallorca
Posts: 18,139












Just as he was beginning to sound somewhat reasonable and exhibiting an IQ somewhat higher than the unskilled illegal immigrants that now nonexistently flood the country.
#787

It was exactly what you have been pleading for, on a number of fronts, in terms of refugee acceptance by the UK.
And you're going to have to wake up to the fact that the foreign policy of the UK and others are often what has led to countries being in a mess and that they must bear some of the responsibility for that. Instead of having constant snide digs at people who go on protest marches etc, perhaps you ought to think about joining in a bit next time a government of ours starts rattling sabres and agitating for military intervention abroad.
And you're going to have to wake up to the fact that the foreign policy of the UK and others are often what has led to countries being in a mess and that they must bear some of the responsibility for that. Instead of having constant snide digs at people who go on protest marches etc, perhaps you ought to think about joining in a bit next time a government of ours starts rattling sabres and agitating for military intervention abroad.
And I oppose any British military intervention for that reason. I was against the Iraq war in my younger years and I was against any action in Syria. What happens is the left campaign for the UK to do something and then when it does the government is told that they've screwed everything up and now we need to invite half of the Middle East to live here. The UK is essentially damned either way.
#788
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 6,292












The good thing about Brexit actually happening is that we will now see whether that was actually the case. When the low-skilled EU nationals return (and at least some of them will, and they won't be replaced), we will see swarms of "economically inactive" Brits abandoning their university lecture halls, their comfortable suburban semis to which they retired early on their company pensions, their sheltered workshops and hospital beds, and the homes of their relatives for whom they are caring, to pick turnips and empty bedpans for the generous salaries that will then magically be offered.
To this one can add making it more cumbersome and costly to hire higher skilled workers in a timely fashion, yet for Brexiters I can only wonder how they would construe this as a benefit
.
#789
BE Enthusiast





Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 976












No, what I want is zero refugee acceptance in the UK or as close to zero as humanly possible.
And I oppose any British military intervention for that reason. I was against the Iraq war in my younger years and I was against any action in Syria. What happens is the left campaign for the UK to do something and then when it does the government is told that they've screwed everything up and now we need to invite half of the Middle East to live here. The UK is essentially damned either way.
And I oppose any British military intervention for that reason. I was against the Iraq war in my younger years and I was against any action in Syria. What happens is the left campaign for the UK to do something and then when it does the government is told that they've screwed everything up and now we need to invite half of the Middle East to live here. The UK is essentially damned either way.
#790
#791
BE Forum Addict






Joined: Dec 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,175











#792
So long...










Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 22,468












Inchoate Offences
The offences
Sections 45 and 46 create offences of encouraging or assisting an offence or offences believing it, or one or more of them, will be committed. In determining 'belief' in Sections 45 and 46, prosecutors should refer to the case law on handling stolen goods, as the test is similar.
Belief is a state of mind which is more than suspicious, the word ‘belief’ is a word of ordinary usage and does not require any elaboration Treacy v DPP (1971) 55 Cr.App.R. 113. If elaboration is required, a direction approved in R v Moys (1984) 79 Cr.App.R.72 should be given, confirming that suspicion, in addition with the fact that the defendant shut his eyes to the circumstances, is not enough, although such matters were relevant to the jury’s determination of the defendant’s knowledge or belief.
Sections 45 and 46 create offences of encouraging or assisting an offence or offences believing it, or one or more of them, will be committed. In determining 'belief' in Sections 45 and 46, prosecutors should refer to the case law on handling stolen goods, as the test is similar.
Belief is a state of mind which is more than suspicious, the word ‘belief’ is a word of ordinary usage and does not require any elaboration Treacy v DPP (1971) 55 Cr.App.R. 113. If elaboration is required, a direction approved in R v Moys (1984) 79 Cr.App.R.72 should be given, confirming that suspicion, in addition with the fact that the defendant shut his eyes to the circumstances, is not enough, although such matters were relevant to the jury’s determination of the defendant’s knowledge or belief.
#793
Reasonable Bitch










Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Mallorca
Posts: 18,139












For example, if there were say, 65000 "unskilled low paid foreigners", that might seem like a "flood" to some. But considering that it would constitute about 0.1% of the population, it's actually hardly a blip on the radar. I think you're squarely in hyperbole territory, ironically precisely what you accuse others of.
And what exactly is "unskilled low paid" in your opinion? Is it someone with less than a master's degree, making less than £50k? If so, you can elevate the size of your "crisis" quite a bit. It's fairly easy to move the goalpost when it's just your "opinion".
In any case, your persistence in demonizing foreigners, particularly as each irrational characterisation is summarily debunked, sheds a very questionable light on your entire diatribe. And consequently, begs the basic question of what exactly do you find so repulsive about foreigners?
OK, you might actually believe the stuff you say, and ignore the fact that it's demonstrably based on false premises, but that again begs the question of how you adopted this dogma? And what will you do when this nonexistent "crisis" is never "remedied"?
Last edited by amideislas; Feb 29th 2020 at 6:23 pm.
#794
BE Enthusiast





Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 976












#795
Banned










Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 21,603












You're entitled to your opinion, but aside from there being little tangible evidence to support it, your assertion is inherently subjective, even as you've previously qualified.
For example, if there were say, 65000 "unskilled low paid foreigners", that might seem like a "flood" to some. But considering that it would constitute about 0.1% of the population, it's actually hardly a blip on the radar. I think you're squarely in hyperbole territory, ironically precisely what you accuse others of.
And what exactly is "unskilled low paid" in your opinion? Is it someone with less than a master's degree, making less than £50k? If so, you can elevate the size of your "crisis" quite a bit. It's fairly easy to move the goalpost when it's just your "opinion".
In any case, your persistence in demonizing foreigners, particularly as each irrational characterisation is summarily debunked, sheds a very questionable light on your entire diatribe. And consequently, begs the basic question of what exactly do you find so repulsive about foreigners?
OK, you might actually believe the stuff you say, and ignore the fact that it's demonstrably based on false premises, but that again begs the question of how you adopted this dogma? And what will you do when this nonexistent "crisis" is never "remedied"?
For example, if there were say, 65000 "unskilled low paid foreigners", that might seem like a "flood" to some. But considering that it would constitute about 0.1% of the population, it's actually hardly a blip on the radar. I think you're squarely in hyperbole territory, ironically precisely what you accuse others of.
And what exactly is "unskilled low paid" in your opinion? Is it someone with less than a master's degree, making less than £50k? If so, you can elevate the size of your "crisis" quite a bit. It's fairly easy to move the goalpost when it's just your "opinion".
In any case, your persistence in demonizing foreigners, particularly as each irrational characterisation is summarily debunked, sheds a very questionable light on your entire diatribe. And consequently, begs the basic question of what exactly do you find so repulsive about foreigners?
OK, you might actually believe the stuff you say, and ignore the fact that it's demonstrably based on false premises, but that again begs the question of how you adopted this dogma? And what will you do when this nonexistent "crisis" is never "remedied"?