Post EU Referendum

Yes, basically this. Corporations of all kinds hate immigration controls. That's why they're always petitioning against H1-B limits in the US for example. They want to be able to freely move people around the planet as they see fit because that keeps their costs as low as possible and immigration regulations are the only thing that stop them from doing that. In the UK's case they will also like to utilise the free trade access to Europe that the EU brings but in either case they couldn't give a monkeys about the needs, wishes or security of the British population, or the population of any other country for that matter.



In other words, something that looks extremely like the EU customs union in delivering the free flow of goods so desired by the UK and eliminating the need for a hard border in Ireland but without tying its hands in terms of the ability to negotiate its own trade deals. Tha sounds rather like a customs union to me. And a little unlikely to be conceded by the EU but we'll see.
I suspect a customs cooperation like with Canada is not the same as a CU.


Exactly this, yet some on the left seem to think FOM is a good thing for the British working class - they are the useful idiots of the business elites, virtue-signalling their approval of FOM to show they are somehow not xenophobic, whilst casting their brethren into poverty.
The 'anybody who disagrees is a small minded racist' stance that the likes of Eddie Izzard and Sadiq Khan took was never going to work.

Reasonable Bitch










Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Mallorca
Posts: 18,142













And I don't see how the UK could claim to be in a free trade area or a customs union without, er, being in one although its fairly obvious that the UK wants the benefits without any of the commitments, so is trying to present a break with both and then a partial opt in.
I agree with your suspicion about Canada - and its FTA falls well short of what the UK wants.


I agree with you however the problem is that remaining a member of the single market comes at a social cost to the UK that many people in Britain just don't want to pay anymore and it's unfair to just nonchalantly dismiss the concerns of those people or the hardships that some of them have had to face. If the EU was still just about the common market then I doubt anybody in the UK would have a problem with it.
There's also the question of whether leaving the EU and the protections it affords will expose the UK to more detrimental forces from within and without. Does taking away unskilled immigration but opening the UK up to full free borderless trade with the entire world really benefit the average or less well off household? Should people doing ordinary jobs for less than spectacular salaries be optimistic about the fact that many of the hardline Brexiters who seem to have May's ear see Brexit as a chance to finish the job Maggie started?
For all the talk of remainer elites, you don't actually believe that the leaver elites have the interests of the struggling classes at the forefront of their minds do you? I mean, I know that's how some of them like to present it at times but we on here all know that's not really what it's all about, don't we?

So long...










Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 22,603












Many councillors are voted in on the basis of their political party. Here are the 2018 local election winners and losers, and their Brexit stance.

BE Forum Addict









Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,087












The hardships people face in the UK are largely a result of government failure to address them and of the implementation of policies actually designed to make life more difficult for some. Brexit alone isn't going to resolve that and any damage to the economy will be borne first and foremost by the least well off.
There's also the question of whether leaving the EU and the protections it affords will expose the UK to more detrimental forces from within and without. Does taking away unskilled immigration but opening the UK up to full free borderless trade with the entire world really benefit the average or less well off household? Should people doing ordinary jobs for less than spectacular salaries be optimistic about the fact that many of the hardline Brexiters who seem to have May's ear see Brexit as a chance to finish the job Maggie started?
For all the talk of remainer elites, you don't actually believe that the leaver elites have the interests of the struggling classes at the forefront of their minds do you? I mean, I know that's how some of them like to present it at times but we on here all know that's not really what it's all about, don't we?
There's also the question of whether leaving the EU and the protections it affords will expose the UK to more detrimental forces from within and without. Does taking away unskilled immigration but opening the UK up to full free borderless trade with the entire world really benefit the average or less well off household? Should people doing ordinary jobs for less than spectacular salaries be optimistic about the fact that many of the hardline Brexiters who seem to have May's ear see Brexit as a chance to finish the job Maggie started?
For all the talk of remainer elites, you don't actually believe that the leaver elites have the interests of the struggling classes at the forefront of their minds do you? I mean, I know that's how some of them like to present it at times but we on here all know that's not really what it's all about, don't we?

Banned










Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 26,724












This is where Remainers miss the point. You blame our governments and their policies yet FOM is not a government policy: it is a fundamental right of EU membership. We can possibly try to hinder it in small ways but there is nothing we can do to stop it. We are where we are with over forty years of EU membership. We are powerless to change FOM. People voted as they did because no one offered them anything, except more of the same. Not a very enticing prospect, was it, more of the same?
Bout as post after post from brexiters , the leave campaigns, and brexit supporting media confirm FOM is just a mask to cover up a wish to reduce ALL immigration..
An antipathy to migrants in general.
Don,t pretend that it is anything else.


This is where Remainers miss the point. You blame our governments and their policies yet FOM is not a government policy: it is a fundamental right of EU membership. We can possibly try to hinder it in small ways but there is nothing we can do to stop it. We are where we are with over forty years of EU membership. We are powerless to change FOM. People voted as they did because no one offered them anything, except more of the same. Not a very enticing prospect, was it, more of the same?
I think some people voted as they did because the campaigns were aimed at (and succeeded in) inducing a sense of panic about a largely mythical loss of control and the spectre of hordes (and hordes of a particular creed, to boot) at the door.
More of the same? Will taking away the immigration of unskilled labour (if indeed that is an outcome) actually resolve most of what people feel to be wrong? I know it will satisfy some but will it on its own make a tangible difference? And what if it's only a cosmetic change, anyway? Suppose they're not counted as immigrants but seasonal or temporary workers? Will that help?


If you and AlL brexiters wanted to and do confine the argument to FOM to inward EU migration we could have a reasoned debate .
Bout as post after post from brexiters , the leave campaigns, and brexit supporting media confirm FOM is just a mask to cover up a wish to reduce ALL immigration..
An antipathy to migrants in general.
Don,t pretend that it is anything else.
Bout as post after post from brexiters , the leave campaigns, and brexit supporting media confirm FOM is just a mask to cover up a wish to reduce ALL immigration..
An antipathy to migrants in general.
Don,t pretend that it is anything else.


For all the talk of remainer elites, you don't actually believe that the leaver elites have the interests of the struggling classes at the forefront of their minds do you? I mean, I know that's how some of them like to present it at times but we on here all know that's not really what it's all about, don't we?

Forum Regular



Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 191












Well that's the 6 million dollar question, isn't it? And that's why it's a matter that's been wrangled about for so long in government and now in parliament. It would seem remiss not to at least try.
But if you're not in a CU or a free trade area, then you can't have a massive free trade deal with one bloc and strike up completely different and separate bespoke free trade agreements with all and sundry unless you offer the same terms to all other WTO members.
And I don't see how the UK could claim to be in a free trade area or a customs union without, er, being in one although its fairly obvious that the UK wants the benefits without any of the commitments, so is trying to present a break with both and then a partial opt in.
I agree with your suspicion about Canada - and its FTA falls well short of what the UK wants.
But if you're not in a CU or a free trade area, then you can't have a massive free trade deal with one bloc and strike up completely different and separate bespoke free trade agreements with all and sundry unless you offer the same terms to all other WTO members.
And I don't see how the UK could claim to be in a free trade area or a customs union without, er, being in one although its fairly obvious that the UK wants the benefits without any of the commitments, so is trying to present a break with both and then a partial opt in.
I agree with your suspicion about Canada - and its FTA falls well short of what the UK wants.
If the UK has a Free Trade Agreement with the EU it can still negotiate bilateral Agreements with other countries which it cannot do if it is part of the EU Customs Union.


Look, if you're living a great life under EU treaty rights in the likes of Spain or Portugal then I can see why you might think that EU FoM is a fantastic idea however try telling that to the single mother who works as a part-time hotel cleaner and has just had her hours cut because agency contracted Romanians will do the same job for less. Wage stagnation is bad enough in the UK without adding an un-metered foreign workforce into the mix.
