Originally Posted by spouse of scouse

It's a bit like that isn't it

Originally Posted by robin1234

Absolutely true and the same accounting logic applies to the Queen & Buckingham palace, and other royal residences etc. Even if we had some dismal Israeli-style presidency, those buildings would have to be maintained and refurbished etc.

Originally Posted by moneypenny20

As for the suggestion they repay the cost of refurbs to Frogmore Cottage, get a ****ing grip. It's a grade 2 listed building that needed serious updates and it cost UK taxpayers less than 1p each to do and the place is not theirs, it's still owned by the Crown.

Originally Posted by Lion in Winter

They are just two very wealthy people. Let them go off and do whatever. Why does everyone else have to talk about it?

Originally Posted by moneypenny20

Honest to god some of you need to take a good long look at yourselves and wonder what sort of people you are to villify and abuse people you actually know sweet F A about other that what you've read in the media. Maybe wonder how you'd feel if, for the sake of some articles, most of which are fabricated or chinese whispers, your loved ones get constantly abused by strangers.

I've just seen a comment on an Instagram post which sums up quite clearly how I imagine the Royal Family feel about Harry and Meghan. 'If as a tiny boy you had to walk behind a gun carriage at your mum's funeral after she was harrassed to death, or face years of people questioning who your dad is, or your wife is hatefully bullied whilst carrying your unborn child; let's all agree you're allowed to **** off if you want to.

Bitching about a woman you do not know, assuming you know anything at all about the dynamics in a marriage you are not a part of, taking great pleasure in guessing how long a marriage will last? Just **** right off. You disgust me.

Originally Posted by BristolUK

Maybe Buck House would make a nice car park.

Originally Posted by andyrebell

Another thing I find interesting which seems to be going over people's head is that they (Harry and Meghan) have left Archie aged 8 months old with her best friend in Canada. Not a word has been mentioned about the parenting.

Originally Posted by Assanah

I think Harry has a right to his own life. He has only one. And a fully understand Meghan that she refuses to live with all this nastiness. She is a foreigner and has no reason to sacrifice her life for Britain.

Originally Posted by BristolUK

Why is it that these two are held in such contempt while someone like the sexually harassing, pension stealing tyrant of a boss 'Sir' Philip Green gets a free pass?

Did he become a more sympathetic figure because his investments took a bit of a tumble and he lost his Billionaire status so is now worth "only" £95,000,000?

Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing

More like why are these two held in such contempt when his Uncle Andy ****s kids? The Palace are supposely 'disappointed' to learn about Harry, but raping children is just fine apparently.

Originally Posted by 007Steve

The core issue here imo is both these two people (who aren't exactly typical) have been on the inside of this fossilised institution and concluded not only that it's irrelevant, but they, and their child, shouldn't be controlled by it.
And let's face, they're not the first. - right???

Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing

Maybe they're just trying to get the poor kid away from Uncle Andy

Originally Posted by Jerseygirl

He was into boys too?

Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing

I didn't know it was a boy, just wanted to make a cheap joke at a useless, inbred toff's expense, do excuse me.