George Floyd
#811
Banned










Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 21,603












You didn't read it in full did you. It very clearly went on to say that the more people jumped in (to use your words) the more unbiased the entries become.
So you are saying that leftists and people radicalised jump in and the article is saying the net result is less biased wiki articles.
Another own goal.
So you are saying that leftists and people radicalised jump in and the article is saying the net result is less biased wiki articles.
Another own goal.

#812

Oh sod it. I'll make it easier for you.
Wikipedia articles are longer, on average, than Britannica articles, and on a per word basis Wikipedia is actually slightly less biased....the authors found that “Wikipedia articles which have received more revisions tend to be more neutral.” The more the crowd works on an article, the less biased it is.
#813
Banned










Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 21,603












You're getting boring now. I refer you to my previous post on this matter.
#814
#817


#818

When she went on a whinge about kids with geographical places for names and judging them, it wasn't exactly ground-breaking, people judge people all the time based on silly things like that. It was all fine until Schofield pointed out her daughter is called India. So she shows herself up to just be a provocative bellend.
Taking away her platform means she probably suffers less abuse, which is no bad thing, people need to be better than just retaliating with hate, but it means she's going to pop up somewhere, although I doubt much mainstream media will tolerate her bullshit anymore.
All in all, no real loss or gain. She's an idiot who says stuff to provoke and people reacting causes more negativity and anger and nastiness. We remove the genuinely nasty idiots and normal people don't turn into them as well.
Everyone needs to have a hug and just stop being bellends.
#819

She should have been banned for being a ****ing moron, nothing more or less than that.
When she went on a whinge about kids with geographical places for names and judging them, it wasn't exactly ground-breaking, people judge people all the time based on silly things like that. It was all fine until Schofield pointed out her daughter is called India. So she shows herself up to just be a provocative bellend.
Taking away her platform means she probably suffers less abuse, which is no bad thing, people need to be better than just retaliating with hate, but it means she's going to pop up somewhere, although I doubt much mainstream media will tolerate her bullshit anymore.
All in all, no real loss or gain. She's an idiot who says stuff to provoke and people reacting causes more negativity and anger and nastiness. We remove the genuinely nasty idiots and normal people don't turn into them as well.
Everyone needs to have a hug and just stop being bellends.
When she went on a whinge about kids with geographical places for names and judging them, it wasn't exactly ground-breaking, people judge people all the time based on silly things like that. It was all fine until Schofield pointed out her daughter is called India. So she shows herself up to just be a provocative bellend.
Taking away her platform means she probably suffers less abuse, which is no bad thing, people need to be better than just retaliating with hate, but it means she's going to pop up somewhere, although I doubt much mainstream media will tolerate her bullshit anymore.
All in all, no real loss or gain. She's an idiot who says stuff to provoke and people reacting causes more negativity and anger and nastiness. We remove the genuinely nasty idiots and normal people don't turn into them as well.
Everyone needs to have a hug and just stop being bellends.
I'm not hugging a load of strangers though

#820
#823

... So she shows herself up to just be a provocative bellend.
Taking away her platform means she probably suffers less abuse, which is no bad thing, people need to be better than just retaliating with hate, but it means she's going to pop up somewhere, although I doubt much mainstream media will tolerate her bullshit anymore.
All in all, no real loss or gain. She's an idiot who says stuff to provoke and people reacting causes more negativity and anger and nastiness. ....
Taking away her platform means she probably suffers less abuse, which is no bad thing, people need to be better than just retaliating with hate, but it means she's going to pop up somewhere, although I doubt much mainstream media will tolerate her bullshit anymore.
All in all, no real loss or gain. She's an idiot who says stuff to provoke and people reacting causes more negativity and anger and nastiness. ....
#825
Banned










Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 21,603











