After birth 'abortions'??!!
#31
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 41,518












I think you need to take a step back and see whether you can tell the difference between dark humour and dead serious consideration of the murder of a child.
You do realise that what they consider "abortion" is the killing of a full-term, baby and not a foetus, do you?
You do realise that what they consider "abortion" is the killing of a full-term, baby and not a foetus, do you?

#34

Those bloody 'trojan' Greeks, acting like Spartans don't you know.
I actually find this argument interesting. ...."they just left newborns out in the elements and if they survived it was the gods will". But someone contradicts this argument, saying lower down "This is what happens when someone is without faith in God"
I actually find this argument interesting. ...."they just left newborns out in the elements and if they survived it was the gods will". But someone contradicts this argument, saying lower down "This is what happens when someone is without faith in God"
Last edited by kimilseung; Feb 28th 2012 at 8:11 pm.

#38

You do realize this "article" is most likely a propaganda tool used by the pro-life faction in order to get people whipped into a frenzy, right? Nobody is actually considering killing new born babies.

#39

And many more reasonable and humane practices have come out of intellectual debate.
You do realize this "article" is most likely a propaganda tool used by the pro-life faction in order to get people whipped into a frenzy, right? Nobody is actually considering killing new born babies.
You do realize this "article" is most likely a propaganda tool used by the pro-life faction in order to get people whipped into a frenzy, right? Nobody is actually considering killing new born babies.
In effect, the use and sensationalism of this 'article' as propaganda is wrong in a practical way, rather than the theoretical wrong of the proposed infanticide?

#40

Maybe so, but at the very outside edge of the whole idea - wouldn't you at least concede that people shouldn't use that argument as a form of rhetoric in an argument against the practice of legitamate abortions? Any woman who has made the decision to have had one of those doesn't need to be guilt tripped by claptrap such as this.
In effect, the use and sensationalism of this 'article' as propaganda is wrong in a practical way, rather than the theoretical wrong of the proposed infanticide?
In effect, the use and sensationalism of this 'article' as propaganda is wrong in a practical way, rather than the theoretical wrong of the proposed infanticide?
Nobody actually believes in killing newborn babies.

#41

Originally Posted by Leslie
You do realize this "article" is most likely a propaganda tool used by the pro-life faction in order to get people whipped into a frenzy, right? Nobody is actually considering killing new born babies.

#42

You believe they're using reverse psychology - it's your opinion, so please don't present it as fact.

#43

One can still find the use of the article in this fashion to be in poor taste, though, irrespective of the validity of the content.

#44


