![]() |
After birth 'abortions'??!!
OK ... this is far too hard for me to stomach - talk about the opposite end of the spectrum to the pro-lifers. Unbelievable.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/ethi...e-not-persons/ |
Re: After birth abortions??!!
Originally Posted by Uncle Ebenezer
(Post 9925409)
OK ... this is far too hard for me to stomach - talk about the opposite end of the spectrum to the pro-lifers. Unbelievable.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/ethi...e-not-persons/ Unfreakin'believable. |
Re: After birth abortions??!!
Originally Posted by Jerseygirl
(Post 9925416)
Would you like me to change the title of this thread to 'After birth murders'? ;)
Unfreakin'believable. |
Re: After birth abortions??!!
Originally Posted by Uncle Ebenezer
(Post 9925422)
It would be a more accurate term, I believe. Maybe you could add quote marks for me?
|
Re: After birth abortions??!!
Originally Posted by Jerseygirl
(Post 9925428)
Your wish is my command.
|
Re: 'After birth abortions'??!!
|
Re: 'After birth abortions'??!!
Originally Posted by CelticRover
(Post 9925453)
|
Re: 'After birth abortions'??!!
OMG.
Why are you reading that shite? |
Re: 'After birth abortions'??!!
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 9925474)
OMG.
Why are you reading that shite? |
Re: After birth 'abortions'??!!
Although I am pro-choice, from a philosophical point of view this makes sense:
The second we allow ourselves to become the arbiters of who is human and who isn’t, this is the calamitous yet inevitable end. Once you say all human life is not sacred, the rest is just drawing random lines in the sand. |
Re: After birth 'abortions'??!!
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 9925516)
Although I am pro-choice, from a philosophical point of view this makes sense:
The second we allow ourselves to become the arbiters of who is human and who isn’t, this is the calamitous yet inevitable end. Once you say all human life is not sacred, the rest is just drawing random lines in the sand. |
Re: 'After birth abortions'??!!
Originally Posted by Uncle Ebenezer
(Post 9925489)
Because I saw a link to it. Why should I not?
|
Re: 'After birth abortions'??!!
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 9925532)
Because it is crap.
|
Re: 'After birth abortions'??!!
Originally Posted by Uncle Ebenezer
(Post 9925539)
Why is it "crap"? Is it factually incorrect, or do you just not approve of the source?
I can't believe the sense of flippancy I got out of that article. There is a vast, vast difference between terminating a pregnancy in utero at less than 20 weeks along and the mother giving birth to a baby and then (lets not muck about) killing that baby. Then there was that clap-trap about adoption being less desirable. The mind boggles. |
Re: 'After birth abortions'??!!
Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
(Post 9925679)
One hopes that it is factually incorrect, to be quite honest.
I can't believe the sense of flippancy I got out of that article. There is a vast, vast difference between terminating a pregnancy in utero at less than 20 weeks along and the mother giving birth to a baby and then (lets not muck about) killing that baby. Then there was that clap-trap about adoption being less desirable. The mind boggles. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 8:27 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.