Gibraltar 2
Mar 23rd 2015, 12:28 pm
#49
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,548
Re: Gibraltar 2
That’s what you posted. How, why, what at? I am interested. As you are the one that read the article could you give me more details?
And it’s so nice to see the Gibraltar Chronicle has another avid reader.
Mar 23rd 2015, 1:01 pm
#50
Banned
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 26,724
Re: Gibraltar 2
I find the GBC site much more inmformative than the " views " from the ministry that we usually see.
Mar 23rd 2015, 1:47 pm
#53
Banned
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Mallorca
Posts: 19,367
Re: Gibraltar 2
But again, nothing even remotely resembling your post. What a surprise (not
).Anyway, keep up the good work. Anxiously waiting the next episode of the EMR bollocks show...
EDIT: I found it!!!!! Here's the LINK.
In a statement the Royal Gibraltar Police has confirmed it has launched an internal investigation into an unauthorised discharge at the Air Terminal Building. It says the Armed Firearms Officer, which has been trained to the standards set by the Association of Chief Police Officers, has been relieved of firearms duties until further notice. It says the last incident of this kind happened in early 2010, and assurs that there was no risk to the public at the time of the discharge.
But the question remains, what does this have to do with anything? Would you like me to provide links to stories of of questionable behaviour in your neighbourhood? What makes Gibraltar so unique in your opinion?
Last edited by amideislas; Mar 23rd 2015 at 2:03 pm.
Mar 23rd 2015, 1:57 pm
#54
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,548
Re: Gibraltar 2
In your post 36, when asked again where you found the news, you said, ‘How did I find the story by clicking on the link on Fred's post and looking on the left hand side of the news paper link where it was among other news stories from GiB.’
Fred’s post was for the Gibraltar Chronicle.
Now you tell me it was in the Gibraltar Broadcasting site.
Last edited by Fred James; Mar 23rd 2015 at 4:03 pm. Reason: No personal attacks please.
Mar 23rd 2015, 3:20 pm
#55
Banned
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 26,724
Re: Gibraltar 2
You time-wasting nutcase.
Fred quotes from the Gibraltar Chronicle. In your post 32 you said, when asked where you found your news, ‘Fred's bible the daily newspaper he quotes from almost every day.’
In your post 36, when asked again where you found the news, you said, ‘How did I find the story by clicking on the link on Fred's post and looking on the left hand side of the news paper link where it was among other news stories from GiB.’
Fred’s post was for the Gibraltar Chronicle.
Now you tell me it was in the Gibraltar Broadcasting site.
What a nutcase you are.
Fred quotes from the Gibraltar Chronicle. In your post 32 you said, when asked where you found your news, ‘Fred's bible the daily newspaper he quotes from almost every day.’
In your post 36, when asked again where you found the news, you said, ‘How did I find the story by clicking on the link on Fred's post and looking on the left hand side of the news paper link where it was among other news stories from GiB.’
Fred’s post was for the Gibraltar Chronicle.
Now you tell me it was in the Gibraltar Broadcasting site.
What a nutcase you are.
Do not blame me if the the local Pravda removed the link. I have only just found the much more informative GBC site.
I take that despite your bombast you now do accept that I was RIGHT !!!
Mar 23rd 2015, 3:40 pm
#56
Banned
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Mallorca
Posts: 19,367
Re: Gibraltar 2
And by way, you apparently read it in passing somewhere, and subsequently refused to provide any reference to it except where you mistakenly thought you may have seen it. That in itself is rather suspect - even if it did turn out to be something you saw in passing. It still doesn't serve your dogmatic belief that Gib is somehow unique in that regard.
Last edited by amideislas; Mar 23rd 2015 at 4:49 pm.
Mar 23rd 2015, 4:34 pm
#57
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,548
Re: Gibraltar 2
‘I take that despite your bombast you now do accept that I was RIGHT !!!’
How can you say you are right when it is not there (if it ever was) where you originally said it was?
Okay, enough from me on this.
Mar 23rd 2015, 5:06 pm
#59
Banned
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 26,724
Re: Gibraltar 2
I see you failed to mention that drive-by shooting. I can assure you I'm also RIGHT about that too, but it's still meaningless in this context. Unless of course I were to claim it were more "proof" of the uniquely dubious nature of the country. And even then, it's hardly unique to the country.
And by way, you apparently read it in passing somewhere, and subsequently refused to provide any reference to it except where you mistakenly thought you may have seen it. That in itself is rather suspect - even if it did turn out to be something you saw in passing. It still doesn't serve your dogmatic belief that Gib is somehow unique in that regard.
And by way, you apparently read it in passing somewhere, and subsequently refused to provide any reference to it except where you mistakenly thought you may have seen it. That in itself is rather suspect - even if it did turn out to be something you saw in passing. It still doesn't serve your dogmatic belief that Gib is somehow unique in that regard.
I would have thought that you regard my interest in Gibraltar affairs and wishing to be informed having found a less biased news source was a positive step.
In fact I suggest that anyone interested in Gib affairs ignores the usual source and looks at the GBC site.
The original reason for my post was as usual to point out that we only ever see links which reflect the views of one member rather than the real NEWS that is out there.
Such as the GIB Government owned property company being sued in London and Madrid for its involvement in a multi million pound property failure in Gib.
You see Gib has more in common with Spain than sme would care to admit.
Yes you can find the details on the GBC site.
Mar 23rd 2015, 5:31 pm
#60
Banned
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Mallorca
Posts: 19,367
Re: Gibraltar 2
Will you agree now that the incident happened,
I would have thought that you regard my interest in Gibraltar affairs and wishing to be informed having found a less biased news source was a positive step.
In fact I suggest that anyone interested in Gib affairs ignores the usual source and looks at the GBC site.
The original reason for my post was as usual to point out that we only ever see links which reflect the views of one member rather than the real NEWS that is out there.
Such as the GIB Government owned property company being sued in London and Madrid for its involvement in a multi million pound property failure in Gib.
You see Gib has more in common with Spain than sme would care to admit.
Yes you can find the details on the GBC site.
I would have thought that you regard my interest in Gibraltar affairs and wishing to be informed having found a less biased news source was a positive step.
In fact I suggest that anyone interested in Gib affairs ignores the usual source and looks at the GBC site.
The original reason for my post was as usual to point out that we only ever see links which reflect the views of one member rather than the real NEWS that is out there.
Such as the GIB Government owned property company being sued in London and Madrid for its involvement in a multi million pound property failure in Gib.
You see Gib has more in common with Spain than sme would care to admit.
Yes you can find the details on the GBC site.
Worse, you arrogantly accuse everybody else of precisely your own behaviour, as if everyone is so daft they won't notice.
So, yes, you scraped by on this one - albeit in a suspiciously roundabout way - and only because >I< assumed >YOUR< responsibility and found the meaningless link you were unwilling or unable to find. I figure you already suffer greatly from your own stupidity so I thought I'd give you a little help. You're welcome.
But for christ's sake, don't start telling the truth now. You're much more entertaining as the village idiot.
