![]() |
Four Times Over
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21094962 'The 100 richest people in the world earned enough last year to end extreme poverty suffered by the poorest on the planet four times over', Oxfam has said. - Put it another way - they could end world poverty entirely... and still have 3/4ths of their money to pull their puds over.
And we think pedophiles are wicked... |
Re: Four Times Over
Originally Posted by Lenox
(Post 10493244)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21094962 'The 100 richest people in the world earned enough last year to end extreme poverty suffered by the poorest on the planet four times over', Oxfam has said. - Put it another way - they could end world poverty entirely... and still have 3/4ths of their money to pull their puds over.
And we think pedophiles are wicked... |
Re: Four Times Over
Always will be too. Share it all out equally next week and in a decade it would be the same. Actually Oxfam could do a bit better and spend more money on the poor instead of fancy offices and fat salaries:thumbdown:
|
Re: Four Times Over
Originally Posted by jackytoo
(Post 10493277)
Actually Oxfam could do a bit better and spend more money on the poor instead of fancy offices and fat salaries:thumbdown:
|
Re: Four Times Over
Originally Posted by jackytoo
(Post 10493277)
Always will be too. Share it all out equally next week and in a decade it would be the same. Actually Oxfam could do a bit better and spend more money on the poor instead of fancy offices and fat salaries:thumbdown:
In the old days, the poor attempted to remove their oppressors by having political revolutions. These days they do it by terrorism, it's no coincidence that the World Trade Center was a prime target for El Quaeda. |
Re: Four Times Over
You can't tell me anything about large charities as I worked for a time as a charity accountant..specialising in fraud control! The larger charities are experts in creative accounting.
As for the rest...absolute drivel. perhaps you could get a job writing for the socialist worker:rofl: |
Re: Four Times Over
Originally Posted by Pocaloca
(Post 10494624)
In the old days, the poor attempted to remove their oppressors by having political revolutions. These days they do it by terrorism, it's no coincidence that the World Trade Center was a prime target for El Quaeda.
|
Re: Four Times Over
Originally Posted by jimenato
(Post 10495118)
Al Qaeda are poor?:rofl:
So pretty much the standard Western model of warmongery. Although I also am very sceptial about many charities, I agree with the sentiment of the thread, the world does not lack money, food or medical treatment to stop millions of children dying every year, but it does lack the will and "humanity". I believe that as we now live in a multinational globalized world, that it should be the right of every person to have basic healthcare and access to food, respective of their nationality. As I've mentioned before though, this opens up a can of worms regarding population control which is probably the biggest problem the human race has. |
Re: Four Times Over
Originally Posted by Pocaloca
(Post 10494624)
in Oxfam's case it isn't, because they spend money to make money,.
|
Re: Four Times Over
Originally Posted by cricketman
(Post 10495208)
Yes, Al Qaeda obviously were led by a Saudi prince who brainwashed the poor into fighting for a "just" cause - in what was essentially a family dispute.
Financing Some financing for al-Qaeda in the 1990s came from the personal wealth of Osama bin Laden.[56] By 2001 Afghanistan had become politically complex and mired. With many financial sources for al-Qaeda Bin Laden's financing role may have become comparatively minor. Sources in 2001 could also have included Jamaa Al-Islamiyya and Islamic Jihad, both associated with Afghan-based Egyptians.[57] Other sources of income in 2001 included the heroin trade and donations from supporters in Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and other Islamic countries.[56] A WikiLeaks released memo from the United States Secretary of State sent in 2009 asserted that the primary source of funding of Sunni terrorist groups worldwide was Saudi Arabia.[58]
Originally Posted by cricketman
(Post 10495208)
So pretty much the standard Western model of warmongery.
|
Re: Four Times Over
Originally Posted by jimenato
(Post 10495272)
So the first and second world wars, the Korean war, the Falklands war, both the gulf wars and the Afghan war were 'essentially family disputes'? I thought you said in one thread that you learnt history at school? |
Re: Four Times Over
sounds to me like its all the fault of the Crusaders taking on the Seljuk Turks who decisively defeated the Byzantine army in 1071 and cut off Christian access to Jerusalem.
don't you just love History..... :rofl: |
Re: Four Times Over
Ever since I can remember aid has been going to the same countries...nothing has changed, infact some have gone backwards through corrupt leaders and useless wars. Much of Africa could be self sufficient, we lived in the Congo and you could stick anything in the ground and it would grow. The mentality is not there. When one of the local workers was getting married we had a whip round and the money collected could have bought them a nice apartment. Instead he threw a 5 day wedding binge for the whole village:blink:
Give everyone in some countries enough to live off for life and they would either spend it in a few years or the army would have taken it off them. Most of live aid money went into buying arms. Some charities spend a fortune sending out UK workers when they could employ local workers As for the charities £100,000 pa is not uncommon for the top staff. I have been to lots of conferences run by Brussels and Unicef and it's Gucci shoes R US:thumbdown: The charity workers essential must have! |
Re: Four Times Over
Originally Posted by jackytoo
(Post 10495408)
Ever since I can remember aid has been going to the same countries...nothing has changed, infact some have gone backwards through corrupt leaders and useless wars. Much of Africa could be self sufficient, we lived in the Congo and you could stick anything in the ground and it would grow. The mentality is not there. When one of the local workers was getting married we had a whip round and the money collected could have bought them a nice apartment. Instead he threw a 5 day wedding binge for the whole village:blink:
Give everyone in some countries enough to live off for life and they would either spend it in a few years or the army would have taken it off them. Most of live aid money went into buying arms. Some charities spend a fortune sending out UK workers when they could employ local workers As for the charities £100,000 pa is not uncommon for the top staff. I have been to lots of conferences run by Brussels and Unicef and it's Gucci shoes R US:thumbdown: The charity workers essential must have! The more I read about such happenings the more I tend to lose faith in human nature. Wherever large charities and funding are involved, it seems the scum all rises to the top. Where are the good guys, there must be some around surely, though to be fair I do see quite a few genuine unpaid ones giving the best of their own time and effort at grass roots level. |
Re: Four Times Over
Originally Posted by Dick Dasterdly
(Post 10495973)
Where are the good guys, there must be some around surely, though to be fair I do see quite a few genuine unpaid ones giving the best of their own time and effort at grass roots level.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 1:59 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.