Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > Europe > Spain
Reload this Page >

Does he have a point?

Does he have a point?

Old Oct 16th 2014, 12:19 am
  #1  
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,518
stuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond repute
Default Does he have a point?

Lord Freud has commented whether disabled employees could/should be paid less.

I agree in certain circumstances.
stuboy is offline  
Old Oct 16th 2014, 3:46 am
  #2  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: London (mainly)/Oliva
Posts: 2,137
johnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does he have a point?

I believe a minimum wage should apply across the board.
Having said that I could see how that may deter some employers from employing people with disabilities.
Perhaps the state should give some form of incentive to Employers to assist Employers who are willing to employ disabled people. Must be better than benefits.
Mind you wasn't it this government that closed the Remploy factories putting many disabled people out of work?
As an aside it seems to me that the minimum wage is set to low and in effect is a hidden subsidy given to Employers as many Employees on the minimum wage rely upon state benefits in addition to the minimum wage they receive.
johnnyone is offline  
Old Oct 16th 2014, 7:02 am
  #3  
FreeThinker
 
jimenato's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Location: the moors and levels
Posts: 9,702
jimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does he have a point?

Originally Posted by stuboy
Lord Freud has commented whether disabled employees could/should be paid less.

I agree in certain circumstances.
I'm not quite sure what is meant by this.

Is it - should be paid less than they currently are
or - should be paid less than an able bodied person doing the same work
or - should be paid less than the minimum wage?
jimenato is offline  
Old Oct 16th 2014, 7:37 am
  #4  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: London (mainly)/Oliva
Posts: 2,137
johnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond reputejohnnyone has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does he have a point?

Originally Posted by jimenato
or - should be paid less than an able bodied person doing the same work?
That's a good point. If a disabled person is as productive as an able bodied position they should be treated equally in any event. eg a blind telephonist
johnnyone is offline  
Old Oct 16th 2014, 7:47 am
  #5  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Fredbargate's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Land of no recession
Posts: 10,717
Fredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond reputeFredbargate has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does he have a point?

Originally Posted by jimenato
I'm not quite sure what is meant by this.

Is it - should be paid less than they currently are
or - should be paid less than an able bodied person doing the same work
or - should be paid less than the minimum wage?
In order for a disabled person to be atractive to an employer there should be some form of sliding scale of subsidies to the employer to overcome any shortfall in production by the disabled employee.

Some would require no subsidy whilst others would, this should help the employee to intigrate into society more, hopefully making their lives more rewarding.
Fredbargate is offline  
Old Oct 16th 2014, 12:49 pm
  #6  
Account Closed
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,176
IamStu has a reputation beyond reputeIamStu has a reputation beyond reputeIamStu has a reputation beyond reputeIamStu has a reputation beyond reputeIamStu has a reputation beyond reputeIamStu has a reputation beyond reputeIamStu has a reputation beyond reputeIamStu has a reputation beyond reputeIamStu has a reputation beyond reputeIamStu has a reputation beyond reputeIamStu has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does he have a point?

A very sensitive subject so I´ll tread carefully.
I would only employ a person with the required skill set, be them able bodied or disabled, and provided any disability would in no way incur extra costs or work for others. This might sound harsh but as a business owner, I have a responsibility to the running of my business, myself and anyone that might work for me.
I also understand there are many jobs in the market place that simply don´t require fully able bodied people.. In such cases, the job is worth a salary that should be paid equally to any person doing the job.
With that said, isn´t the term "disabled" too much of an umbrella term for any of us to actually know what we´re talking about?
IamStu is offline  
Old Oct 16th 2014, 3:24 pm
  #7  
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,518
stuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does he have a point?

Originally Posted by IamStu
A very sensitive subject so I´ll tread carefully.
I would only employ a person with the required skill set, be them able bodied or disabled, and provided any disability would in no way incur extra costs or work for others. This might sound harsh but as a business owner, I have a responsibility to the running of my business, myself and anyone that might work for me.
I also understand there are many jobs in the market place that simply don´t require fully able bodied people.. In such cases, the job is worth a salary that should be paid equally to any person doing the job.
With that said, isn´t the term "disabled" too much of an umbrella term for any of us to actually know what we´re talking about?
stuboy is offline  
Old Oct 16th 2014, 4:02 pm
  #8  
FreeThinker
 
jimenato's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Location: the moors and levels
Posts: 9,702
jimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond reputejimenato has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does he have a point?

Originally Posted by stuboy
+1
jimenato is offline  
Old Oct 23rd 2014, 12:07 pm
  #9  
BE Forum Addict
 
MikeJ's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,675
MikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does he have a point?

I believe that in Australia and elsewhere they have a system where the productivity of the disabled person is measured in some way and the employee is paid what the job is worth (i.e. no value judgement about the individual) - which I think is what Lord Freud was trying to say - and that the state needed to find a way of topping it up.

There are a number of disabled people who have been priced out of the job market by the minimum wage. It is very important for a person's self respect to feel valued with a waged job.

So what Freud was trying to say, in a hamfisted way, should be applauded and not used for opportunistic political point scoring at the expense of disabled people.
MikeJ is offline  
Old Oct 27th 2014, 10:15 am
  #10  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 977
Porth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does he have a point?

Originally Posted by IamStu
A very sensitive subject so I´ll tread carefully.
I would only employ a person with the required skill set, be them able bodied or disabled, and provided any disability would in no way incur extra costs or work for others. This might sound harsh but as a business owner, I have a responsibility to the running of my business, myself and anyone that might work for me.
I also understand there are many jobs in the market place that simply don´t require fully able bodied people.. In such cases, the job is worth a salary that should be paid equally to any person doing the job.
With that said, isn´t the term "disabled" too much of an umbrella term for any of us to actually know what we´re talking about?
Until you have first hand experience of the life of a Disabled Person (my wife has been disabled for almost forty years) I suggest it is a subject area that should be treated with some caution.
Porth is offline  
Old Oct 27th 2014, 10:16 am
  #11  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 977
Porth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does he have a point?

Originally Posted by MikeJ
I believe that in Australia and elsewhere they have a system where the productivity of the disabled person is measured in some way and the employee is paid what the job is worth (i.e. no value judgement about the individual) - which I think is what Lord Freud was trying to say - and that the state needed to find a way of topping it up.

There are a number of disabled people who have been priced out of the job market by the minimum wage. It is very important for a person's self respect to feel valued with a waged job.

So what Freud was trying to say, in a hamfisted way, should be applauded and not used for opportunistic political point scoring at the expense of disabled people.
But of course it was this Government that closed down Remploy
Porth is offline  
Old Oct 27th 2014, 10:44 am
  #12  
BE Forum Addict
 
MikeJ's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,675
MikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does he have a point?

Originally Posted by Porth
But of course it was this Government that closed down Remploy
Actually Remploy Employment Services is still alive and well. The DWP have published plans to privatise it (whilst committing to use their services for government referrals) The direct employment business was started being phased out by the last Government in the early 2000's. When this government proposed withdrawing the subsidy then Remploy responded by closing over half the remaining factories.

Quote:
"The partner/investor will need to demonstrate the commitment, capacity and capability to continue the delivery of Work Choice and continue to grow the business in line with Remploy's mission.

"We will ensure that the Remploy pension scheme continues to be funded and that the accrued benefits of members are protected.

"Our key priority during this process will be to ensure that Remploy Employment Services becomes an independent sustainable business which continues to support disabled people in finding and remaining in employment."

Last edited by MikeJ; Oct 27th 2014 at 10:49 am.
MikeJ is offline  
Old Oct 27th 2014, 10:44 am
  #13  
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,518
stuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond reputestuboy has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does he have a point?

Originally Posted by Porth
But of course it was this Government that closed down Remploy
As a social model Remploy was fantastic. As a business it was a disaster. I have some albeit limited experience of this company.
stuboy is offline  
Old Oct 27th 2014, 10:47 am
  #14  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 977
Porth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond reputePorth has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does he have a point?

Originally Posted by MikeJ
Actually Remploy is still alive and well. The DWP have published plans to privatise it (whilst committing to use their services for government referrals) The direct employment business was phased out by the last Government in the early 2000's

Quote:
"The partner/investor will need to demonstrate the commitment, capacity and capability to continue the delivery of Work Choice and continue to grow the business in line with Remploy's mission.

"We will ensure that the Remploy pension scheme continues to be funded and that the accrued benefits of members are protected.

"Our key priority during this process will be to ensure that Remploy Employment Services becomes an independent sustainable business which continues to support disabled people in finding and remaining in employment."
Not in Wales.
Porth is offline  
Old Oct 27th 2014, 11:05 am
  #15  
BE Forum Addict
 
MikeJ's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,675
MikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond reputeMikeJ has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does he have a point?

Originally Posted by Porth
Not in Wales.
Although the one in Porth (& Heywood) went to a management buyout and is now E-Cycle ltd.
MikeJ is offline  

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.