700,000 Seat rigged engines
#76
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 322
Re: 700,000 Seat rigged engines
Fred, you should set up a Motor Trade page. We could talk cars all day long and not worry about going off subject.
#79
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 322
Re: 700,000 Seat rigged engines
"Dream" SEAT now thats a bit strong........
#80
Re: 700,000 Seat rigged engines
£36,479 is the price of one I have just built online at :-
http://configurator.seat.co.uk/seat-...?msk=1#carline
http://configurator.seat.co.uk/seat-...?msk=1#carline
#82
Re: 700,000 Seat rigged engines
It gets round the Nurnburgring in less than 8 minutes.
Quite a few 100k cars cannot do that, and to make it even more interesting, that model is the estate car!
Quite a few 100k cars cannot do that, and to make it even more interesting, that model is the estate car!
Last edited by Fred James; Oct 7th 2015 at 3:58 pm.
#84
Re: 700,000 Seat rigged engines
I didn't realise they'd taken such a big hit, down 40% !
I would tend to agree the will probably continue to go back up from that figure, but when and if they will get ever back to where they were is another question entirely, with quite a lot of negative publicity from ongoing lawsuits which could continue for years as well as loss of confidence and trust.
Much was said about the likelihood of other manufactures pulling the same stunt, but up to now there is no sign of that being the case and if the other big boys start to sue for the share of the market they are estimated to have been cheated out of, then the sky is the limit as regards payouts and compensation.
#85
Re: 700,000 Seat rigged engines
Interestingly, the rogue EA189 VW engine was the least bad result.
#86
Re: 700,000 Seat rigged engines
You say that, but a UK university tested a whole range of cars for NOx emissions, based on real world conditions actually on the road this summer and they all failed to meet the standards required, in some cases by a factor of more than 10.
Interestingly, the rogue EA189 VW engine was the least bad result.
Interestingly, the rogue EA189 VW engine was the least bad result.
#87
Re: 700,000 Seat rigged engines
You say that, but a UK university tested a whole range of cars for NOx emissions, based on real world conditions actually on the road this summer and they all failed to meet the standards required, in some cases by a factor of more than 10.
Interestingly, the rogue EA189 VW engine was the least bad result.
Interestingly, the rogue EA189 VW engine was the least bad result.
#88
Re: 700,000 Seat rigged engines
It was reported in the press.
Official tester claims four more diesel car giants break toxic emissions limit | Daily Mail Online
There have also been some tests in Germany comparing the emissions using the current test and the new tesy due to come in in a couple of years. It's still a lab test but it is more realistic than the current test.
Wide range of cars emit more pollution in realistic driving tests, data shows | Environment | The Guardian
ADAC "EcoTest": Viele Euro-6-Diesel überschreiten NOx-Grenzwerte - autobild.de
Official tester claims four more diesel car giants break toxic emissions limit | Daily Mail Online
There have also been some tests in Germany comparing the emissions using the current test and the new tesy due to come in in a couple of years. It's still a lab test but it is more realistic than the current test.
Wide range of cars emit more pollution in realistic driving tests, data shows | Environment | The Guardian
ADAC "EcoTest": Viele Euro-6-Diesel überschreiten NOx-Grenzwerte - autobild.de
#89
Re: 700,000 Seat rigged engines
Thanks for that, it makes very interesting reading. I wonder how the other manufacturers have been cheating the tests.
#90
Re: 700,000 Seat rigged engines
Apart from VW, and only then in the US, there is no evidence so far that anyone has been cheating.
Those reports I posted only show, that in the first case, when you test the vehicles on the road, they fail the test, but that is only the fault of the stupid test. Interestingly, in that test, the dodgy VW engine did fairly well.
The other two links just show the problems most manufacturers will face when the new (laboratory) test comes into effect in 2017.
None of them address the real issue, which is can any manufacturer meet the stringent US EPA tests - clearly VW cannot, (at least with the old engine). Since, in the US, they do not seem to have independently tested the Euro6 engines, we are none the wiser. Bearing in mind that the ADAC test shows that most current Euro6 cars cannot pass the new EU test, it would seem unlikely that any of them would pass the US test (which is 30mg as opposed to 80mg in the EU test).
Those reports I posted only show, that in the first case, when you test the vehicles on the road, they fail the test, but that is only the fault of the stupid test. Interestingly, in that test, the dodgy VW engine did fairly well.
The other two links just show the problems most manufacturers will face when the new (laboratory) test comes into effect in 2017.
None of them address the real issue, which is can any manufacturer meet the stringent US EPA tests - clearly VW cannot, (at least with the old engine). Since, in the US, they do not seem to have independently tested the Euro6 engines, we are none the wiser. Bearing in mind that the ADAC test shows that most current Euro6 cars cannot pass the new EU test, it would seem unlikely that any of them would pass the US test (which is 30mg as opposed to 80mg in the EU test).