Packet 4

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 16th 2010, 11:24 am
  #1  
Just Joined
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 3
alex200203 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Packet 4

Hi, I recieved Packet 4 today in the mail and am pretty overjoyed at getting my interview in a timely manner, however I do have a question regarding the actual letter, this is the part thats got me bothered...If this has been asked or an issue before sorry for making a new post couldnt find any info on it.
__________________________________________________ ____________
Visa Appointment
Date Time
*****************
07-May-2010 10:00

Case Number: LND2010XXXXXX
Name: (p) : my name
Preference Category: K1 - GRBR

Travelling Applicants:

(c) My daughter's name - date of birth


Encl : Packet 4
__________________________________________________ ____________
Shouldnt my name be under traveling applicants rather than my daughter from a past relationship that went about as bad as they can go will not be travelling with me. (she was of course listed as wont be coming with me on forms I'd filled.) or do they just do that, dont want there to be an error on the paperwork should i contact them or is this normal?

HALP!

thanks for your time.
-Alex
alex200203 is offline  
Old Apr 16th 2010, 12:09 pm
  #2  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 38,865
ian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Packet 4

Originally Posted by alex200203
Shouldnt my name be under traveling applicants rather than my daughter...
It's your interview - since your name is listed at the top. That your daughter is also listed isn't really a concern - they do that. If I knew why, I'd be rich! Anyway... no worries.

Ian
ian-mstm is offline  
Old Apr 16th 2010, 12:14 pm
  #3  
Just Joined
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 3
alex200203 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Packet 4

thanks Ian,

I just thought it odd that they'd list her under traveling applicants when ive made it clear that she wont be coming with me on every form they've ever recieved, but if its something they do I'll add that to the list of things they do that make no sense,

I appreciate you taking the time to reply.
-Alex
alex200203 is offline  
Old Apr 16th 2010, 5:21 pm
  #4  
Forum Regular
 
LBJR07's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 128
LBJR07 is just really niceLBJR07 is just really niceLBJR07 is just really niceLBJR07 is just really niceLBJR07 is just really niceLBJR07 is just really niceLBJR07 is just really niceLBJR07 is just really nice
Default Re: Packet 4

hey congrats on your interview date! If you dont mind me asking how long did you have to wait for packet 4?
LBJR07 is offline  
Old Apr 16th 2010, 5:36 pm
  #5  
Just Joined
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 3
alex200203 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Packet 4

Originally Posted by LBJR07
hey congrats on your interview date! If you dont mind me asking how long did you have to wait for packet 4?

Four weeks, two days. Royal mail snailed it to me 3days after it was sent from london.
alex200203 is offline  
Old Apr 16th 2010, 6:13 pm
  #6  
 
meauxna's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 35,082
meauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Packet 4

Originally Posted by alex200203
thanks Ian,

I just thought it odd that they'd list her under traveling applicants when ive made it clear that she wont be coming with me on every form they've ever recieved, but if its something they do I'll add that to the list of things they do that make no sense,

I appreciate you taking the time to reply.
-Alex
Parents have been known to change their minds.

Just set it straight at the interview. Maybe you could ask them why they put her name there and enlighten the rest of us with the reply!
meauxna is offline  
Old Apr 16th 2010, 10:58 pm
  #7  
BE Commentator
 
S Folinsky's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 8,420
S Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Packet 4

Originally Posted by alex200203
Shouldnt my name be under traveling applicants rather than my daughter from a past relationship that went about as bad as they can go will not be travelling with me. (she was of course listed as wont be coming with me on forms I'd filled.) or do they just do that, dont want there to be an error on the paperwork should i contact them or is this normal?

HALP!

thanks for your time.
-Alex
Comment: The current DOS software is an upgrade of the venerable IVACS system. As evidence of this, the vestigial designation of the interview notice as "Packet 4" is there. The packet system was abandoned some years back. From the approved visa petition, the Packet 4 [and the old Packet 3 for that matter] would refer to the principal alien and then list the principal and the accompanying relatives as traveling. This information was lifted from the approved visa petition. Principal divorced from spouse? Still listed. New kid born, not there.

As a matter of general advice: when the father of a child immigrates to the US, it is good practice to maintain very good records and back-up documentation of child support payments for the children not living with you.
S Folinsky is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.