Originally Posted by Madam Medusa

i agree...with all the people who are turned down for infertility (and other medical treatment) i reckon they should be waaaayyy down on the list, more cos she's 51 than anything else...

MM, xx

Originally Posted by Rumble Tumble

That is seriously taking the pith I agree P2P.

Originally Posted by Paidtoplease

Especially as the guy killed someone because he wouldn't give him his fags ....Dame those frigging twats of Human right judges where the crap are their brains..aarrrrrggggggggggggggggg :curse::curse::curse:

Originally Posted by Paidtoplease

Especially as the guy killed someone because he wouldn't give him his fags ....Dame those frigging twats of Human right judges where the crap are their brains..aarrrrrggggggggggggggggg :curse::curse::curse:

Originally Posted by Eva

Scenario: A 51 yr old fem and convicted time serving murderer apply to adopt a child.Chances of success? Nil.Why? risk factors.

O.K for them to make their own though-then bash the whippersnapper to pulp when it won't stop crying or steals the fags or Diamondwhite.
Funny thing justice;the Law;human rights........

Originally Posted by why

the trouble is all those judges are right weirdo's they have far too much power the law is completely bonkers and stuck back in "roman times" it all needs to be rewritten and much less corruptible.......why are we so stuck in the past

Originally Posted by B.Geezer

The law, as I know it, has built and refined over the ages but still has many ancient precedents which are used to justify certain decisions.See below Pertains more to Merchant Law-Corporate/Company Law. After all, 50 years ago no one had really heard of computers or e mail etc so we are using old laws to govern modern crimes.The Superhighway is rigourusly policed by Intellectual Property Law.

Add to that the fact Brussels now rules the waves.No, Sovereingnty hasn't been totally relinquished. and there are a lot of spoon fed British judges that not only fail to recognise the severity of the crimes but continue to wear nappies and be breast fed.Public schoolboys and Oedipul complexes go hand in hand-however-we are removed slightly from Lord Denning, Master of the Rolls(not like Baby you can drive my car) and 'Judges from an European System' .... in other words complete twisted twats... and there you have it. Mass murderers go free(which ones?) whilst pensioners who freeze during the winter are given 6 months for not responding to a court order for a parking fine.(Legal Positivism)

We are all insulted by these decisions but let's face it, fox hunting, for example, has been a much more important topic of debate for the government because 10,000 vocal people make more noise than 10,000,000 shuffling around muttering about how bad things have become.(So why don't you write in to your MP or The People's Friend?
Anyway... **** the foxes!

Originally Posted by Eva

I have highlighted my arguement-

Originally Posted by B.Geezer

The law, as I know it, has built and refined over the ages but still has many ancient precedents which are used to justify certain decisions. After all, 50 years ago no one had really heard of computers or e mail etc so we are using old laws to govern modern crimes.

Add to that the fact Brussels now rules the waves and there are a lot of spoon fed British judges that not only fail to recognise the severity of the crimes but continue to wear nappies and be breast fed.... in other words complete twisted twats... and there you have it. Mass murderers go free whilst pensioners who freeze during the winter are given 6 months for not responding to a court order for a parking fine.

We are all insulted by these decisions but let's face it, fox hunting, for example, has been a much more important topic of debate for the government because 10,000 vocal people make more noise than 10,000,000 shuffling around muttering about how bad things have become.

Anyway... **** the foxes!

Originally Posted by Paidtoplease

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e...er/7128145.stm

This is when I want to say: **** their human rights

Originally Posted by Rog_Rams

The real question is, why would the world want those particular genes to be propagated?

I vouch that there are sufficient morons to go around already!

Originally Posted by Paidtoplease

The answer is that the world don't seem to have a choice, it was the bunch of twat judges that made that decission for us :curse: