![]() |
Re: UK Election
The nation has spoken. Well, 36.9% voted Tory. Labours share of the vote went up and they lost seats. UKIP and Green supporters are fuming at the inherent lack of representation provided by the FPTP system. The Scottish issue is very interesting too.
|
Re: UK Election
Originally Posted by littlejimmy
(Post 11640928)
The nation has spoken. Well, 36.9% voted Tory. Labours share of the vote went up and they lost seats. UKIP and Green supporters are fuming at the inherent lack of representation provided by the FPTP system. The Scottish issue is very interesting too.
Pity that it was just a few years ago (2011) there was a referendum on this very issue and only 42% of the electorate bothered to vote and of that 68% votes against change. You reap what you sow |
Re: UK Election
I don't know if it'd make much of a difference at the end of the day.
Proportional representation means coalition governments. The Tories would have entered a coalition with UKIP and DUP and received a working majority.
Originally Posted by shiva
(Post 11641185)
And none of the reasons this happened are new but finally people are awake and pissed off.
Pity that it was just a few years ago (2011) there was a referendum on this very issue and only 42% of the electorate bothered to vote and of that 68% votes against change. You reap what you sow |
Re: UK Election
Originally Posted by DXBtoDOH
(Post 11641222)
I don't know if it'd make much of a difference at the end of the day.
Proportional representation means coalition governments. The Tories would have entered a coalition with UKIP and DUP and received a working majority. Perhaps it's just as well this time round. The thought of 87 ukip MPs terrifies me |
Re: UK Election
Originally Posted by shiva
(Post 11641185)
And none of the reasons this happened are new but finally people are awake and pissed off.
Pity that it was just a few years ago (2011) there was a referendum on this very issue and only 42% of the electorate bothered to vote and of that 68% votes against change. You reap what you sow |
Re: UK Election
Originally Posted by shiva
(Post 11640294)
who knows but its going to be interesting
Not sure what they can / can't do to disrupt / change much, but it's going to be interesting to see unfold and potentially one of those history defining / changing moments in time.
Originally Posted by shiva
(Post 11641185)
And none of the reasons this happened are new but finally people are awake and pissed off.
Pity that it was just a few years ago (2011) there was a referendum on this very issue and only 42% of the electorate bothered to vote and of that 68% votes against change. You reap what you sow The amount of pathetic whining on facebook about how shit the voting system is, but people forget this from the last election. Fact is, the Tories got more votes than anyone else. |
Re: UK Election
Were you whinging when Labour took full advantage of FPTP and the constituency boundaries to rack up enormous majorities well beyond their actual share of the vote?
Methinks not.... I used to hate the phrase that all is fair in love and war and politics, but now that I'm older I can see why what goes around comes around.
Originally Posted by littlejimmy
(Post 11641536)
That referendum was a stitch up. They granted it to the lib dems as a price for the coalition, but then campaigned hard against it, and it was the crappy AV system...and as you say, voter apathy was rampant. The Tories used the LDs and then screwed them over in this election. Now they will get the boundary changes through and make sure it's harder than ever for them to lose....and they will never countenance a change to FPTP. They will say, "well, you had your chance!" I'm depressing myself now...think I'll move to Scotland for good. They're the only beacon of hope now.
|
Re: UK Election
Relieved that UKIP did poorly but very sad about the Lib Dem result. Concerned about the outright Tory majority as I think the Lib Dems constrained them in a good way last time.
Ed Milliband was a poor choice for Labour leader but who will be next? Best known front runners are Chuka Umunna (too foreign sounding a name for many??) and Yvette Cooper. Her husband, Ed Balls won't disappear and will be back. Lib Dems will be severely sidelined now and they really have no one of note to step up with both Vince Cable and Simon Hughes gone. Hughes is a nice guy and my previous MP Ed Davey also lost his seat back to the Tories in Kingston/Surbiton and although no hit in the House, was a very good local MP. As a natural centrist this really all makes me very sad indeed. Markets bounced up on Friday due to certainly, not a specific result. |
Re: UK Election
Rubbish. It's time to move on from pathetic partisanship. It wasn't fair then and it isn't fair now. What makes it more pronounced now is that there are more parties involved. FPTP works fine for a 2 party system, but more people are moving away from the traditional parties and rightly want their votes to count. Whether you agree with UKIP or not (and I don't), the fact that they got 4 million votes and only 1 seat is ridiculous, especially when the SNP got 56 seats for 1.5 million votes.
|
Re: UK Election
Originally Posted by littlejimmy
(Post 11641898)
Rubbish. It's time to move on from pathetic partisanship. It wasn't fair then and it isn't fair now. What makes it more pronounced now is that there are more parties involved. FPTP works fine for a 2 party system, but more people are moving away from the traditional parties and rightly want their votes to count. Whether you agree with UKIP or not (and I don't), the fact that they got 4 million votes and only 1 seat is ridiculous, especially when the SNP got 56 seats for 1.5 million votes.
4 million votes from the whole of the UK?? that is chicken feed. The Tories won THANK GOD for that. Now let them finish the job that they started.;) |
Re: UK Election
Whatever. You win. I give up.
|
Re: UK Election
Originally Posted by littlejimmy
(Post 11641898)
Rubbish. It's time to move on from pathetic partisanship. It wasn't fair then and it isn't fair now. What makes it more pronounced now is that there are more parties involved. FPTP works fine for a 2 party system, but more people are moving away from the traditional parties and rightly want their votes to count. Whether you agree with UKIP or not (and I don't), the fact that they got 4 million votes and only 1 seat is ridiculous, especially when the SNP got 56 seats for 1.5 million votes.
much better to compare like for like say total liberal votes vs ukip votes |
Re: UK Election
Originally Posted by littlejimmy
(Post 11641908)
Whatever. You win. I give up.
|
Re: UK Election
Originally Posted by themajor
(Post 11641904)
Why is it rubbish?
4 million votes from the whole of the UK?? that is chicken feed. The Tories won THANK GOD for that. Now let them finish the job that they started.;) The job that they started? Privatisation of parts of the NHS? Creating more demand for foodbanks? More zero hours contracts that that keep people down and needing welfare support? More enforcement of the Bedroom Tax without taking personal circumstances into consideration? A party for the selfish. |
Re: UK Election
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 5:26 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.