The Saville Case - who's next
Apr 26th 2013, 6:31 pm
#151
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,553
Re: The Saville Case - who's next
Apr 26th 2013, 6:34 pm
#152
Shark Fisherman
Joined: Feb 2012
Location: Doha
Posts: 4,568
Re: The Saville Case - who's next
Apr 26th 2013, 7:21 pm
#153
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Apr 2011
Location: Windscale....
Posts: 5,712
Apr 26th 2013, 9:05 pm
#155
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Apr 2011
Location: Windscale....
Posts: 5,712
Apr 27th 2013, 6:53 am
#156
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,553
Re: The Saville Case - who's next
Yes, but there's something a little odd about the list of allegations:
The charges are:
:: One offence of indecent assault relating to a girl, aged 14, in 1966
:: One offence of indecent assault relating to a woman, aged 18, in 1974/75
:: Three offences of indecent assault relating to a girl, aged 15, in 1977/78
:: One offence of indecent assault relating to a woman, aged 19, in 1978
:: Two offences of indecent assault relating to a girl, aged 16 or 17, in 1981/82
:: One offence of indecent assault relating to a woman, aged 19, in 1980/81
:: Two offences of indecent assault relating to a woman, aged 18, in 1984/85
:: The CPS said there was insufficient evidence to authorise charges in relation to three separate allegations.
He's 70 so the most serious charge (a 14yo girl) relates to when he was 23, in the 1960s - the 'girl' must be in her early-sixties now........... that's going to be a tricky one to prove.
I could be wrong, and he may indeed be guilty, but I'm not going to die of shock if he is acquitted - or even if it never comes to trial at all.
Then it will be his turn - he will go after those who "falsely" accused him....... just wait and see...........
The charges are:
:: One offence of indecent assault relating to a girl, aged 14, in 1966
:: One offence of indecent assault relating to a woman, aged 18, in 1974/75
:: Three offences of indecent assault relating to a girl, aged 15, in 1977/78
:: One offence of indecent assault relating to a woman, aged 19, in 1978
:: Two offences of indecent assault relating to a girl, aged 16 or 17, in 1981/82
:: One offence of indecent assault relating to a woman, aged 19, in 1980/81
:: Two offences of indecent assault relating to a woman, aged 18, in 1984/85
:: The CPS said there was insufficient evidence to authorise charges in relation to three separate allegations.
He's 70 so the most serious charge (a 14yo girl) relates to when he was 23, in the 1960s - the 'girl' must be in her early-sixties now........... that's going to be a tricky one to prove.
I could be wrong, and he may indeed be guilty, but I'm not going to die of shock if he is acquitted - or even if it never comes to trial at all.
Then it will be his turn - he will go after those who "falsely" accused him....... just wait and see...........
Apr 27th 2013, 8:00 am
#157
Shark Fisherman
Joined: Feb 2012
Location: Doha
Posts: 4,568
Re: The Saville Case - who's next
Yes, but there's something a little odd about the list of allegations:
The charges are:
:: One offence of indecent assault relating to a girl, aged 14, in 1966
:: One offence of indecent assault relating to a woman, aged 18, in 1974/75
:: Three offences of indecent assault relating to a girl, aged 15, in 1977/78
:: One offence of indecent assault relating to a woman, aged 19, in 1978
:: Two offences of indecent assault relating to a girl, aged 16 or 17, in 1981/82
:: One offence of indecent assault relating to a woman, aged 19, in 1980/81
:: Two offences of indecent assault relating to a woman, aged 18, in 1984/85
:: The CPS said there was insufficient evidence to authorise charges in relation to three separate allegations.
He's 70 so the most serious charge (a 14yo girl) relates to when he was 23, in the 1960s - the 'girl' must be in her early-sixties now........... that's going to be a tricky one to prove.
I could be wrong, and he may indeed be guilty, but I'm not going to die of shock if he is acquitted - or even if it never comes to trial at all.
Then it will be his turn - he will go after those who "falsely" accused him....... just wait and see...........
The charges are:
:: One offence of indecent assault relating to a girl, aged 14, in 1966
:: One offence of indecent assault relating to a woman, aged 18, in 1974/75
:: Three offences of indecent assault relating to a girl, aged 15, in 1977/78
:: One offence of indecent assault relating to a woman, aged 19, in 1978
:: Two offences of indecent assault relating to a girl, aged 16 or 17, in 1981/82
:: One offence of indecent assault relating to a woman, aged 19, in 1980/81
:: Two offences of indecent assault relating to a woman, aged 18, in 1984/85
:: The CPS said there was insufficient evidence to authorise charges in relation to three separate allegations.
He's 70 so the most serious charge (a 14yo girl) relates to when he was 23, in the 1960s - the 'girl' must be in her early-sixties now........... that's going to be a tricky one to prove.
I could be wrong, and he may indeed be guilty, but I'm not going to die of shock if he is acquitted - or even if it never comes to trial at all.
Then it will be his turn - he will go after those who "falsely" accused him....... just wait and see...........
The part that made my day was the part he was to be charged, I happen to agree with everything you have put above. Think Stuart Hall is the 1st in the courts from Yewtree?? and he is bailed until next week. It will be interesting how they get convictions in these cases where its essentially one word against another and no proof.
Apr 27th 2013, 8:31 am
#158
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,553
Re: The Saville Case - who's next
And anyway............ as one of my Twitter pals has written - are the "I hope he's guilty" lobby really hoping that several teenage girls were sexually assaulted?
Apr 27th 2013, 8:46 am
#159
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Apr 2011
Location: Windscale....
Posts: 5,712
Apr 27th 2013, 10:07 am
#160
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2009
Location: Disneyland, Dubai
Posts: 15,887
Apr 27th 2013, 12:23 pm
#162
Hit 16's
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Of all the gin joints, in all the towns, in all the world, she walks into mine
Posts: 13,112
Apr 27th 2013, 5:09 pm
#163
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Up on the Ranches not down on the Springs
Posts: 2,109
Apr 27th 2013, 9:12 pm
#164
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,646
Re: The Saville Case - who's next
Yes, but there's something a little odd about the list of allegations:
The charges are:
:: One offence of indecent assault relating to a girl, aged 14, in 1966
:: One offence of indecent assault relating to a woman, aged 18, in 1974/75
:: Three offences of indecent assault relating to a girl, aged 15, in 1977/78
:: One offence of indecent assault relating to a woman, aged 19, in 1978
:: Two offences of indecent assault relating to a girl, aged 16 or 17, in 1981/82
:: One offence of indecent assault relating to a woman, aged 19, in 1980/81
:: Two offences of indecent assault relating to a woman, aged 18, in 1984/85
:: The CPS said there was insufficient evidence to authorise charges in relation to three separate allegations.
He's 70 so the most serious charge (a 14yo girl) relates to when he was 23, in the 1960s - the 'girl' must be in her early-sixties now........... that's going to be a tricky one to prove.
I could be wrong, and he may indeed be guilty, but I'm not going to die of shock if he is acquitted - or even if it never comes to trial at all.
Then it will be his turn - he will go after those who "falsely" accused him....... just wait and see...........
The charges are:
:: One offence of indecent assault relating to a girl, aged 14, in 1966
:: One offence of indecent assault relating to a woman, aged 18, in 1974/75
:: Three offences of indecent assault relating to a girl, aged 15, in 1977/78
:: One offence of indecent assault relating to a woman, aged 19, in 1978
:: Two offences of indecent assault relating to a girl, aged 16 or 17, in 1981/82
:: One offence of indecent assault relating to a woman, aged 19, in 1980/81
:: Two offences of indecent assault relating to a woman, aged 18, in 1984/85
:: The CPS said there was insufficient evidence to authorise charges in relation to three separate allegations.
He's 70 so the most serious charge (a 14yo girl) relates to when he was 23, in the 1960s - the 'girl' must be in her early-sixties now........... that's going to be a tricky one to prove.
I could be wrong, and he may indeed be guilty, but I'm not going to die of shock if he is acquitted - or even if it never comes to trial at all.
Then it will be his turn - he will go after those who "falsely" accused him....... just wait and see...........
No doubt he got curious in the back row of the movies...
No doubt he has been charged,not because of what he allegedly did but
because of who he is.
I could bore you with the Moorov Doctrine but no doubt H has run that past
you already.
X
Apr 28th 2013, 12:12 pm
#165
Big Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,889
Re: The Saville Case - who's next