|
The NHS rocks
|
Re: The NHS rocks
Would rather not.:thumbdown:
|
Re: The NHS rocks
I know this sounds strange, but funnily enough, I don't spend much time staring at myself down below.
Anyhow, average age is 23, hey?! Have to laugh - if they're that worried then, they'll be having a fit once they'd had a couple of kids! |
Re: The NHS rocks
The comment below explains everything lol
"As a Hispanic man in the Pornography business, White women actresses want to stay attractive in order to get many roles. One of the operations they want is to have their vaginas enlarges or clitoris in order for a male porn stars penis to easily penetrate when they have sex. Many White women have tight vaginas where a penis cannot easily penetrate or when the penis is in it loses traction because of the hardness within the organs. I have had sex with White women porn actress who didn't have this operation & MAN, it is hard to have sex with this White women because either I get exhausted or my penis contract. Another is plastic surgery where I have to listen to many White women porn actress who whine that they are not good looking like Hispanic women. Believe ME, as a Hispanic pornstar, I have to put up with a lot of issues with White women porn actress where perfection is in their lifeblood!!! " |
Re: The NHS rocks
Who were the 'researchers' who came up with this? And what's the pay like?
As long as it's not more than a hundred quid an hour, I'll pay............ |
Re: The NHS rocks
Or should that read, 'NHS on the rocks?'
|
Re: The NHS rocks
Absolutely ridiculous, what sort of world do we live in when girls are having plastic surgery on their erm bits and pieces to make them look better... it really is a fooked up world. How insecure must these women be- perhaps some therapy to give them some self value rather than surgery. :rolleyes:
I wonder if there was an operation to get a 'normal' cock how many men would opt for surgery? |
Re: The NHS rocks
Originally Posted by kittycat1
(Post 9585422)
Absolutely ridiculous, what sort of world do we live in when girls are having plastic surgery on their erm bits and pieces to make them look better... it really is a fooked up world. How insecure must these women be- perhaps some therapy to give them some self value rather than surgery. :rolleyes:
I wonder if there was an operation to get a 'normal' cock how many men would opt for surgery? |
Re: The NHS rocks
Originally Posted by Paracletus
(Post 9583340)
N. |
Re: The NHS rocks
Originally Posted by Norm_uk
(Post 9586205)
I find it odd how they compare this to the genital mutilation in other cultures which is apparently illegal in Britain but we have thousands of boys a year under the age of consent having their foreskins mutilated in the name of religion and culture - all perfectly legal too.
N. |
Re: The NHS rocks
Originally Posted by Norm_uk
(Post 9586205)
I find it odd how they compare this to the genital mutilation in other cultures which is apparently illegal in Britain but we have thousands of boys a year under the age of consent having their foreskins mutilated in the name of religion and culture - all perfectly legal too.
N. |
Re: The NHS rocks
Originally Posted by Paracletus
(Post 9587287)
Isn't male circumsision found to have some health benefits? As far as I understand, male/female circumsision differ significantly. I do entirely agree with you though. Didn't god create man? Cutting things off or covering them up is surely an indication that he can't be perfect..or perhaps, maybe he doesn't even exist or care. :eek:
|
Re: The NHS rocks
Originally Posted by alfrombarking
(Post 9586801)
why dont they have a special force dealing with these matters like they do with the arranged marriage?
Originally Posted by Paracletus
(Post 9587287)
Isn't male circumsision found to have some health benefits? As far as I understand, male/female circumsision differ significantly. I do entirely agree with you though. Didn't god create man? Cutting things off or covering them up is surely an indication that he can't be perfect..or perhaps, maybe he doesn't even exist or care. :eek:
There's a lot of info on male circumcision on the net - it's quite sickening and medically almost always not needed. 75% of the men in the world manage fine with their foreskins... N. |
Re: The NHS rocks
Originally Posted by Norm_uk
(Post 9587772)
I have no idea. Perhaps because going after child genital mutilation would mean pissing off both religious Jews and obeservant Muslims as well as a lot of idiots who think removing 20,000 nerve endings off your knob is a good replacement for basic hygiene.
If it has health benefits why don't we have major health organisations recommending it? There's a lot of info on male circumcision on the net - it's quite sickening and medically almost always not needed. 75% of the men in the world manage fine with their foreskins... N. Mind you, I've never been without, so.... er....... I'll get me coat. |
Re: The NHS rocks
Originally Posted by Norm_uk
(Post 9587772)
I have no idea. Perhaps because going after child genital mutilation would mean pissing off both religious Jews and obeservant Muslims as well as a lot of idiots who think removing 20,000 nerve endings off your knob is a good replacement for basic hygiene.
If it has health benefits why don't we have major health organisations recommending it? There's a lot of info on male circumcision on the net - it's quite sickening and medically almost always not needed. 75% of the men in the world manage fine with their foreskins... N. Read the first paragraph. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 11:46 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.