Maths/Reasoning/Logic/Probability Exercise
#31
Re: Maths/Reasoning/Logic/Probability Exercise
Why is this?
Well, the first roll you have probability 1/6 of getting a six.
The first roll doesn't change the dice though, so it doesn't change what'll happen next roll.
Therefore, if we call the number of rolls x, you have a 1/6 chance of needing one roll:
1 * 1/6
and a 5/6 chance of needing to start again - but having 'wasted' a roll.
(x+1) * 5/6
x = 1*1/6 + (x+1)*5/6
x = 1/6 + 5x/6 + 5/6
x = 1 + 5x/6
x/6 = 1
x = 6
Fair play to your daughter though, breaking down the individual probabilities is a good way to approach it...
#32
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,553
Re: Maths/Reasoning/Logic/Probability Exercise
This is a key part. While this is very true, it does not change the fact that it would take an expected 6 rolls to get a 6 (not four). Ain't probability great?
Why is this?
Well, the first roll you have probability 1/6 of getting a six.
The first roll doesn't change the dice though, so it doesn't change what'll happen next roll.
Therefore, if we call the number of rolls x, you have a 1/6 chance of needing one roll:
1 * 1/6
and a 5/6 chance of needing to start again - but having 'wasted' a roll.
(x+1) * 5/6
x = 1*1/6 + (x+1)*5/6
x = 1/6 + 5x/6 + 5/6
x = 1 + 5x/6
x/6 = 1
x = 6
Fair play to your daughter though, breaking down the individual probabilities is a good way to approach it...
Why is this?
Well, the first roll you have probability 1/6 of getting a six.
The first roll doesn't change the dice though, so it doesn't change what'll happen next roll.
Therefore, if we call the number of rolls x, you have a 1/6 chance of needing one roll:
1 * 1/6
and a 5/6 chance of needing to start again - but having 'wasted' a roll.
(x+1) * 5/6
x = 1*1/6 + (x+1)*5/6
x = 1/6 + 5x/6 + 5/6
x = 1 + 5x/6
x/6 = 1
x = 6
Fair play to your daughter though, breaking down the individual probabilities is a good way to approach it...
You go to the races, and notice two particular horses (in separate races), each of which you believe has a 70 pct chance of winning its race.
It is tempting to assume the chance of BOTH winning must be 70 pct, but of course, it's (0.70 x 0.70) 49%, and therefore "unlikely".
My daughter followed that principle............
#33
Re: Maths/Reasoning/Logic/Probability Exercise
Probabilities play strange tricks on people.
You only need 23 people in a room to have a 50% chance of a pair of them sharing a birthday. You only need 57 for that to be a 99% chance...
Ignoring people with birthdays on Feb 29 that is And assuming uniform distribution of birthdays which is not quite true but doesn't change things tooo much.
#34
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,553
Re: Maths/Reasoning/Logic/Probability Exercise
I showed your calculations to a mate who wants to be A if you are B......
His explanation:
Expected return on any given throw £2.50 { £(1+2+3+4+5+0) / 6 }
Expected number of throws before you hit a 6 = 3.5 { (1+2+3+4+5+6) / 6 }
£2.5 * 3.5 = £8.75
You can't both be right..............
His explanation:
Expected return on any given throw £2.50 { £(1+2+3+4+5+0) / 6 }
Expected number of throws before you hit a 6 = 3.5 { (1+2+3+4+5+6) / 6 }
£2.5 * 3.5 = £8.75
You can't both be right..............
#35
Re: Maths/Reasoning/Logic/Probability Exercise
(3.5 may also be the median number of throws - can't be bothered to work out the probability density function and check. Nevertheless this isn't that useful. Yes, around half the time you will throw three times or fewer (assuming that is the median). But half the time you will throw four or more - and by "or more" I mean "up to infinity".)
Last edited by typical; Jul 8th 2011 at 9:58 am.
#36
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,553
Re: Maths/Reasoning/Logic/Probability Exercise
OK - this is how I see it (as a non-mathematician)....... the 'four rolls' was a rough estimate............
B should consider how likely it is that the game will still continue after one roll, then after two rolls, etc.......
After 3.80176 rolls, the probability of the game continuing falls to 50%. (0.8333333, or 5/6, to the power of 3.80176 = 0.500002). After 3.80176 rolls of non-6 results, the maximum that could have been achieved is 3.80176 x 5. The minimum is 3.80176 x 1. The probable outcome is the mean of all combinations, which is 11.4053.
Therefore B should be willing to pay no more than 11.40, and preferably less.
Works for me..............
B should consider how likely it is that the game will still continue after one roll, then after two rolls, etc.......
After 3.80176 rolls, the probability of the game continuing falls to 50%. (0.8333333, or 5/6, to the power of 3.80176 = 0.500002). After 3.80176 rolls of non-6 results, the maximum that could have been achieved is 3.80176 x 5. The minimum is 3.80176 x 1. The probable outcome is the mean of all combinations, which is 11.4053.
Therefore B should be willing to pay no more than 11.40, and preferably less.
Works for me..............
#37
Re: Maths/Reasoning/Logic/Probability Exercise
The thread keeps going!
Again, the problem with the median is one side you have the set {1 throw, 2 throws, 3 throws} and the other side you have {4 throws, 5 throws, ...} - all the way to infinity.
That's why the mean is higher than the median. The range of winnings values on one side of the median is 0-15, and on the other side 3-infinity.
You also can't throw dice 3.8 times
But if you want to miss the chance to win INFINITE MONEY for the sake of three pounds sixty...
(There are any number of ways to get to the expected number of rolls to get a six, but they all equal 6.)
Again, the problem with the median is one side you have the set {1 throw, 2 throws, 3 throws} and the other side you have {4 throws, 5 throws, ...} - all the way to infinity.
That's why the mean is higher than the median. The range of winnings values on one side of the median is 0-15, and on the other side 3-infinity.
You also can't throw dice 3.8 times
But if you want to miss the chance to win INFINITE MONEY for the sake of three pounds sixty...
(There are any number of ways to get to the expected number of rolls to get a six, but they all equal 6.)
#38
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,553
Re: Maths/Reasoning/Logic/Probability Exercise
The thread keeps going!
Again, the problem with the median is one side you have the set {1 throw, 2 throws, 3 throws} and the other side you have {4 throws, 5 throws, ...} - all the way to infinity.
That's why the mean is higher than the median. The range of winnings values on one side of the median is 0-15, and on the other side 3-infinity.
You also can't throw dice 3.8 times
But if you want to miss the chance to win INFINITE MONEY for the sake of three pounds sixty...
(There are any number of ways to get to the expected number of rolls to get a six, but they all equal 6.)
Again, the problem with the median is one side you have the set {1 throw, 2 throws, 3 throws} and the other side you have {4 throws, 5 throws, ...} - all the way to infinity.
That's why the mean is higher than the median. The range of winnings values on one side of the median is 0-15, and on the other side 3-infinity.
You also can't throw dice 3.8 times
But if you want to miss the chance to win INFINITE MONEY for the sake of three pounds sixty...
(There are any number of ways to get to the expected number of rolls to get a six, but they all equal 6.)
And surely I still have the chance to win an infinite amount even if I "only" pay 11.40?
OK - let's stop now, or else we'll either (a) get banned by the Mods, or (b) get accused of being boring by fellow Bored (sic) members...........
#39
Re: Maths/Reasoning/Logic/Probability Exercise
You'll only have the chance to win if the other party will let you play
Final question... who came up with this?
#40
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,553
Re: Maths/Reasoning/Logic/Probability Exercise
#42
Re: Maths/Reasoning/Logic/Probability Exercise
Interesting one they threw at my daughter last week............. your views please?
A and B are playing a dice game. The dice is rolled, and if there is a number from 1 to 5, A pays that amount to B. (i.e. if a 3 is rolled, A pays 3 pounds to B, etc).
If a 6 is rolled at any time, including on the first roll, the game ends.
So A cannot win, and B cannot lose...........
Just one catch: B has to pay an 'entrance fee' to A before he is allowed to play the game.
Question: how much should B be willing to pay........?
A and B are playing a dice game. The dice is rolled, and if there is a number from 1 to 5, A pays that amount to B. (i.e. if a 3 is rolled, A pays 3 pounds to B, etc).
If a 6 is rolled at any time, including on the first roll, the game ends.
So A cannot win, and B cannot lose...........
Just one catch: B has to pay an 'entrance fee' to A before he is allowed to play the game.
Question: how much should B be willing to pay........?
Can't be arsed dry with all the maths and calculus broohahaaa....
#43
Re: Maths/Reasoning/Logic/Probability Exercise
I showed your calculations to a mate who wants to be A if you are B......
His explanation:
Expected return on any given throw £2.50 { £(1+2+3+4+5+0) / 6 }
Expected number of throws before you hit a 6 = 3.5 { (1+2+3+4+5+6) / 6 }
£2.5 * 3.5 = £8.75
You can't both be right..............
His explanation:
Expected return on any given throw £2.50 { £(1+2+3+4+5+0) / 6 }
Expected number of throws before you hit a 6 = 3.5 { (1+2+3+4+5+6) / 6 }
£2.5 * 3.5 = £8.75
You can't both be right..............
In fairness the answer isn't really 15 - it should be less than 15 if he is rational, or greater if he gets free beer and ham sandwiches as part of the deal.
#44
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,553
Re: Maths/Reasoning/Logic/Probability Exercise
If the question is about B's willingness to pay to play, he would surely want to measure the probabilities attached to how long the game is likely to last?
I certainly wouldn't pay 15 pounds to play, but 11.40 feels about right......
#45
Re: Maths/Reasoning/Logic/Probability Exercise
He will, yes. Again, the problem is taking the median - because of the "long tail" the 50% he'd be giving up on your strategy has the potential to be very, very, very lucrative. A would want compensated for that, even if B doesn't think it to be likely that he'd get there.