![]() |
Loss Payee
Any construction insurance specialists out there who would be willing to impart a little knowledge?
Thanks in anticipation :D |
Re: Loss Payee
Hi Bahtatboy, you can PM me and I'll see if I can assist
|
Re: Loss Payee
Originally Posted by Muncle
(Post 10850548)
Hi Bahtatboy, you can PM me and I'll see if I can assist
|
Re: Loss Payee
Originally Posted by Bahtatboy
(Post 10850575)
Thanks, PM sent.
|
Re: Loss Payee
Originally Posted by The Dean
(Post 10850610)
Once you've sorted out your problem, you can bloody well explain what the thread title means....... thank you.
|
Re: Loss Payee
Originally Posted by Bahtatboy
(Post 10850208)
Any construction insurance specialists out there who would be willing to impart a little knowledge? Thanks in anticipation :D
|
Re: Loss Payee
Originally Posted by mentalist
(Post 10850627)
A loss payee clause is a clause in a contract of insurance which provides that, in the event of payment being made under the policy in relation to the insured risk, payment will be made to a third party rather than to the insured beneficiary of the policy. Easy peasy, lemon squeezy. Just check the policy wording to establish to whom the settlement cheque should be made payable.
|
Re: Loss Payee
Originally Posted by mentalist
(Post 10850627)
A loss payee clause is a clause in a contract of insurance which provides that, in the event of payment being made under the policy in relation to the insured risk, payment will be made to a third party rather than to the insured beneficiary of the policy. Easy peasy, lemon squeezy. Just check the policy wording to establish to whom the settlement cheque should be made payable.
EAR Policy has Additional Insureds (both named and un-named). Policy does not have a Loss Payee clause. One of the named Additional Insureds has a claim, for which the Insurer's Loss Adjuster has recommended payment. In theory at least, the named Additional Insured has the same basic rights under the Policy as the Named Insured. Is it industry practice, in a situation where this is no Loss Payee identified, for the Insurer to reimburse the named Additional Insured directly, or will the Insurer normally require consent of the Named Insured and the named Additional Insureds before making such payment? There, now I've let the cat out of the bag. Although I appreciate that most of you will think its a hamster or shopping trolley. Edit: One party involved is assuming that the Named Insured (also the policyholder) is the default Loss Payee. I don't agree. |
Re: Loss Payee
ohh, insurance - my favourite. Talk dirty to me... Subrogation
|
Re: Loss Payee
*unsubscribes*
|
Re: Loss Payee
Originally Posted by Millhouse
(Post 10850739)
ohh, insurance - my favourite. Talk dirty to me... Subrogation
|
Re: Loss Payee
Check your PM Bahtatboy.
Cheers |
Re: Loss Payee
Originally Posted by Muncle
(Post 10851761)
Check your PM Bahtatboy.
Cheers |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 2:37 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.