It's Saatchi-v-Lawson...........
Jun 18th 2013, 4:08 pm
#32
Hit 16's
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Of all the gin joints, in all the towns, in all the world, she walks into mine
Posts: 13,112
Re: It's Saatchi-v-Lawson...........
That sounds wise. "Rules are for the guidance of all, and the adherence of fools." That said, I can't imagine any circumstances in which it is appropriate or necessary for a difference of opinion to result in violence.
Jun 19th 2013, 9:15 am
#33
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Aug 2009
Location: Dubai
Posts: 4,017
Re: It's Saatchi-v-Lawson...........
I followed him around the side of the building pulled him to once side then calmly knocked f**k out him for being a low life bully .
The only regret was that i never went back for the Xmas tree .
Jun 19th 2013, 9:31 am
#34
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,553
Re: It's Saatchi-v-Lawson...........
I was in Argos many years ago buying a Xmas tree and a fella in front of me had a bit of a row with his missus then turned around and broke her nose , left her in a pool of blood and calmly slipped away .
I followed him around the side of the building pulled him to once side then calmly knocked f**k out him for being a low life bully .
The only regret was that i never went back for the Xmas tree .
I followed him around the side of the building pulled him to once side then calmly knocked f**k out him for being a low life bully .
The only regret was that i never went back for the Xmas tree .
Jun 19th 2013, 9:58 am
#35
Hit 16's
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Of all the gin joints, in all the towns, in all the world, she walks into mine
Posts: 13,112
Jul 7th 2013, 9:22 am
#37
Big Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,889
Re: It's Saatchi-v-Lawson...........
Jul 7th 2013, 9:53 am
#38
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jan 2011
Location: Dubai
Posts: 3,467
Re: It's Saatchi-v-Lawson...........
I've seen similar. The silly cow was getting slapped silly by her chap. My mate stepped in between them to block him off and calm it down. Next minute from behind she hit my mate round the cannister with her shoe. The high heel went straight through his cheek....... not nice.
Jul 7th 2013, 10:07 am
#39
Concierge
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 29,625
Re: It's Saatchi-v-Lawson...........
Jul 7th 2013, 10:21 am
#40
Account Closed
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 0
Re: It's Saatchi-v-Lawson...........
Ah, the classic; We all assumed he was a wife beater and should be shot at dawn...but none of us really knows what happened behind closed doors so should have just said what he did was naughty but she might be an equally big knobhead in private.
Hindsight eh. I think we should just keep judging folk Bluecat, it's much more fun.
I fundamentally disagree with ever laying a hand on a woman but if I'd been your mate I know I'd have had to battle the red mist if someone thought that was acceptable when trying to help!
Hindsight eh. I think we should just keep judging folk Bluecat, it's much more fun.
I've seen similar. The silly cow was getting slapped silly by her chap. My mate stepped in between them to block him off and calm it down. Next minute from behind she hit my mate round the cannister with her shoe. The high heel went straight through his cheek....... not nice.
Jul 7th 2013, 10:25 am
#41
Concierge
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 29,625
Re: It's Saatchi-v-Lawson...........
Ah, the classic; We all assumed he was a wife beater and should be shot at dawn...but none of us really knows what happened behind closed doors so should have just said what he did was naughty but she might be an equally big knobhead in private.
Hindsight eh. I think we should just keep judging folk Bluecat, it's much more fun.
I fundamentally disagree with ever laying a hand on a woman but if I'd been your mate I know I'd have had to battle the red mist if someone thought that was acceptable when trying to help!
Hindsight eh. I think we should just keep judging folk Bluecat, it's much more fun.
I fundamentally disagree with ever laying a hand on a woman but if I'd been your mate I know I'd have had to battle the red mist if someone thought that was acceptable when trying to help!
where did I judge her?
Jul 7th 2013, 10:29 am
#43
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jan 2011
Location: Dubai
Posts: 3,467
Re: It's Saatchi-v-Lawson...........
Jul 7th 2013, 10:36 am
#44
Account Closed
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 0
Re: It's Saatchi-v-Lawson...........
Sorry, I wasn't clear.
I mean, who knows what's happened behind closed doors. We publicly saw something unacceptable and all agreed it was that, unacceptable.
Him filing for divorce seems a bit strange, so maybe (definitely) there is much more to it that we (everyone bar them) know about....
SO, my point is, we should all just carry on as normal and speak on what we see ('judging' situations, without making us sound harsh).
I wasn't having a go, sorry BC.
Maybe the rule should be not to hit a 'lady'.
I mean, who knows what's happened behind closed doors. We publicly saw something unacceptable and all agreed it was that, unacceptable.
Him filing for divorce seems a bit strange, so maybe (definitely) there is much more to it that we (everyone bar them) know about....
SO, my point is, we should all just carry on as normal and speak on what we see ('judging' situations, without making us sound harsh).
I wasn't having a go, sorry BC.
Maybe the rule should be not to hit a 'lady'.
Jul 7th 2013, 10:42 am
#45
Concierge
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 29,625
Re: It's Saatchi-v-Lawson...........
Sorry, I wasn't clear.
I mean, who knows what's happened behind closed doors. We publicly saw something unacceptable and all agreed it was that, unacceptable.
Him filing for divorce seems a bit strange, so maybe (definitely) there is much more to it that we (everyone bar them) know about....
SO, my point is, we should all just carry on as normal and speak on what we see ('judging' situations, without making us sound harsh).
I wasn't having a go, sorry BC.
Maybe the rule should be not to hit a 'lady'.
I mean, who knows what's happened behind closed doors. We publicly saw something unacceptable and all agreed it was that, unacceptable.
Him filing for divorce seems a bit strange, so maybe (definitely) there is much more to it that we (everyone bar them) know about....
SO, my point is, we should all just carry on as normal and speak on what we see ('judging' situations, without making us sound harsh).
I wasn't having a go, sorry BC.
Maybe the rule should be not to hit a 'lady'.
now I will judge, I think he comes across as an arrogant self centred twat, and to be honest I have never liked her either.
