Iran

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 18th 2016, 4:17 am
  #16  
Big Member
 
NorthernLad's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,889
NorthernLad has a reputation beyond reputeNorthernLad has a reputation beyond reputeNorthernLad has a reputation beyond reputeNorthernLad has a reputation beyond reputeNorthernLad has a reputation beyond reputeNorthernLad has a reputation beyond reputeNorthernLad has a reputation beyond reputeNorthernLad has a reputation beyond reputeNorthernLad has a reputation beyond reputeNorthernLad has a reputation beyond reputeNorthernLad has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Iran

Originally Posted by Millhouse
New sanctions already imposed. Albeit in a reduced form.
My take is that they are appeasing KSA and Israel, the whole region is extremely fragile and this move would show they aren't cutting them loose (for now).
NorthernLad is offline  
Old Jan 18th 2016, 5:21 am
  #17  
BE Forum Addict
 
Boomhauer's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,641
Boomhauer has a reputation beyond reputeBoomhauer has a reputation beyond reputeBoomhauer has a reputation beyond reputeBoomhauer has a reputation beyond reputeBoomhauer has a reputation beyond reputeBoomhauer has a reputation beyond reputeBoomhauer has a reputation beyond reputeBoomhauer has a reputation beyond reputeBoomhauer has a reputation beyond reputeBoomhauer has a reputation beyond reputeBoomhauer has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Iran

Originally Posted by NorthernLad
My take is that they are appeasing KSA and Israel, the whole region is extremely fragile and this move would show they aren't cutting them loose (for now).
US government foreign policy is dictated by Israel and the GCC to a great extent but amazingly Obama managed to get the Iran deal through. Would not have happened with a GOP presidency.
Boomhauer is offline  
Old Jan 18th 2016, 6:37 am
  #18  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Location: Luton
Posts: 1,162
iggle has a reputation beyond reputeiggle has a reputation beyond reputeiggle has a reputation beyond reputeiggle has a reputation beyond reputeiggle has a reputation beyond reputeiggle has a reputation beyond reputeiggle has a reputation beyond reputeiggle has a reputation beyond reputeiggle has a reputation beyond reputeiggle has a reputation beyond reputeiggle has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Iran

Maybe Iran aren't the bad guys that they have always been perceived to be? USA has a terrible history of supply rebels in proxy wars that cause more harm than good. Maybe USA has finally learnt its lesson (no way) that actually doing nothing can be better than being a d!ck.

As the same with Mr Bad man Putin/Russia? Who is fighting ISIS & the other rebels in Syria, Iran and Russia...who is supp...(I'll stop right there) I see it quite black and white
iggle is offline  
Old Jan 19th 2016, 12:03 am
  #19  
Gold-Helmeted Member
 
captainflack's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: Setubal-ish
Posts: 688
captainflack has a reputation beyond reputecaptainflack has a reputation beyond reputecaptainflack has a reputation beyond reputecaptainflack has a reputation beyond reputecaptainflack has a reputation beyond reputecaptainflack has a reputation beyond reputecaptainflack has a reputation beyond reputecaptainflack has a reputation beyond reputecaptainflack has a reputation beyond reputecaptainflack has a reputation beyond reputecaptainflack has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Iran

Originally Posted by Scamp
Interesting points there. Especially the last paragraph - it's a fair assessment but I think KSA will remain ultimately all-powerful and important because of it's size and wealth. Oil will remain necessary.
Oil will remain important, but the US has developed huge reserves to the point where they were talking about exporting (though present prices almost certainly rule this out), Saudi simply does not have the leverage it did. The US is largely energy independent.

As for wealth, the IMF suggests Saudi could be bankrupt in 5 years. Its size will only make it a bigger basket case.

The US has backed Saudi for decades, so the strategic shift away is significant.
captainflack is offline  
Old Jan 19th 2016, 1:10 am
  #20  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: May 2012
Location: Cayman Islands
Posts: 4,997
Gordon Barlow has a reputation beyond reputeGordon Barlow has a reputation beyond reputeGordon Barlow has a reputation beyond reputeGordon Barlow has a reputation beyond reputeGordon Barlow has a reputation beyond reputeGordon Barlow has a reputation beyond reputeGordon Barlow has a reputation beyond reputeGordon Barlow has a reputation beyond reputeGordon Barlow has a reputation beyond reputeGordon Barlow has a reputation beyond reputeGordon Barlow has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Iran

This article contains quite a good analysis of the US-Iran contest, from what I have found to be a usually thoughtful and reliable source.
Israel vs Iran: Israel loses, *big* time | The Vineyard of the Saker

Extract: "... the Empire will have to turn to its traditional set of dirty tricks: false flags, support for various terrorist groups, subversion of the Islamic Republic by means of the local money elites, sabotage, “human rights” campaigns (à la Neda), support for “gay rights”, arming of separatists groups, etc.
"But, at least for the time being, this is a huge victory for Iran and and equally huge defeat for Israel: the poor Zionists have now been robbed of not one, but two wars they wanted so badly..."
Gordon Barlow is offline  
Old Jan 19th 2016, 3:20 am
  #21  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Location: Luton
Posts: 1,162
iggle has a reputation beyond reputeiggle has a reputation beyond reputeiggle has a reputation beyond reputeiggle has a reputation beyond reputeiggle has a reputation beyond reputeiggle has a reputation beyond reputeiggle has a reputation beyond reputeiggle has a reputation beyond reputeiggle has a reputation beyond reputeiggle has a reputation beyond reputeiggle has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Iran

Originally Posted by Gordon Barlow
This article contains quite a good analysis of the US-Iran contest, from what I have found to be a usually thoughtful and reliable source.
Israel vs Iran: Israel loses, *big* time | The Vineyard of the Saker

Extract: "... the Empire will have to turn to its traditional set of dirty tricks: false flags, support for various terrorist groups, subversion of the Islamic Republic by means of the local money elites, sabotage, “human rights” campaigns (à la Neda), support for “gay rights”, arming of separatists groups, etc.
"But, at least for the time being, this is a huge victory for Iran and and equally huge defeat for Israel: the poor Zionists have now been robbed of not one, but two wars they wanted so badly..."
My spelling is horrific, but this guy spelt Bahrain wrong. It also clearly had an anti Israel agenda.
iggle is offline  
Old Jan 19th 2016, 4:23 am
  #22  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Location: Dubai
Posts: 3,467
jam25mack has a reputation beyond reputejam25mack has a reputation beyond reputejam25mack has a reputation beyond reputejam25mack has a reputation beyond reputejam25mack has a reputation beyond reputejam25mack has a reputation beyond reputejam25mack has a reputation beyond reputejam25mack has a reputation beyond reputejam25mack has a reputation beyond reputejam25mack has a reputation beyond reputejam25mack has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Iran

Originally Posted by Scamp
I find it hard to believe sailors don't know where they're going (as with the Brits a few years ago)

..
I think that was a different matter. The Brits knew exactly where they were and that was in International waters. The Iranians were at that time just playing games similar to when they detained the group of 18yr old expat sailors travelling from Dubai to Doha for a sailing regatta, stating they had strayed into their waters.

The Brits even had photos of the GPS screen (showing they were in International waters) with the Iranian launches in the background if I remember rightly.

All that said, the Brits were very well treated during their short detainment and hold no negative thoughts to the Iranians, in fact I'm sure I read somewhere they actually had quite a nice time.
jam25mack is offline  
Old Jan 19th 2016, 4:29 am
  #23  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Thread Starter
 
Millhouse's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Location: Disneyland, Dubai
Posts: 15,887
Millhouse has a reputation beyond reputeMillhouse has a reputation beyond reputeMillhouse has a reputation beyond reputeMillhouse has a reputation beyond reputeMillhouse has a reputation beyond reputeMillhouse has a reputation beyond reputeMillhouse has a reputation beyond reputeMillhouse has a reputation beyond reputeMillhouse has a reputation beyond reputeMillhouse has a reputation beyond reputeMillhouse has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Iran

I was once on a hotel-run fishing trip from the coast of RAK and the Iranian guard came to our boat and asked us to turn back.

I'd have loved to have made some headlines - especially as I had broken my glasses during the trip and had tapped them up like Jack Duckworth.
Millhouse is offline  
Old Jan 19th 2016, 4:39 am
  #24  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 0
scrubbedexpat141 scrubbedexpat141 scrubbedexpat141 scrubbedexpat141 scrubbedexpat141 scrubbedexpat141 scrubbedexpat141 scrubbedexpat141 scrubbedexpat141 scrubbedexpat141 scrubbedexpat141
Default Re: Iran

Originally Posted by jam25mack
I think that was a different matter. The Brits knew exactly where they were and that was in International waters. The Iranians were at that time just playing games similar to when they detained the group of 18yr old expat sailors travelling from Dubai to Doha for a sailing regatta, stating they had strayed into their waters.

The Brits even had photos of the GPS screen (showing they were in International waters) with the Iranian launches in the background if I remember rightly.

All that said, the Brits were very well treated during their short detainment and hold no negative thoughts to the Iranians, in fact I'm sure I read somewhere they actually had quite a nice time.
If I'm honest, I couldn't remember the situation with the Brits, but wanted to make sure I referenced it, hoping someone else would clarify....so thank you!

Originally Posted by Millhouse
I was once on a hotel-run fishing trip from the coast of RAK and the Iranian guard came to our boat and asked us to turn back.

I'd have loved to have made some headlines - especially as I had broken my glasses during the trip and had tapped them up like Jack Duckworth.
hahahaahahahahahahahaha
scrubbedexpat141 is offline  
Old Jan 19th 2016, 9:11 am
  #25  
Gold-Helmeted Member
 
captainflack's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: Setubal-ish
Posts: 688
captainflack has a reputation beyond reputecaptainflack has a reputation beyond reputecaptainflack has a reputation beyond reputecaptainflack has a reputation beyond reputecaptainflack has a reputation beyond reputecaptainflack has a reputation beyond reputecaptainflack has a reputation beyond reputecaptainflack has a reputation beyond reputecaptainflack has a reputation beyond reputecaptainflack has a reputation beyond reputecaptainflack has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Iran

Originally Posted by Millhouse
I was once on a hotel-run fishing trip from the coast of RAK and the Iranian guard came to our boat and asked us to turn back.

I'd have loved to have made some headlines - especially as I had broken my glasses during the trip and had tapped them up like Jack Duckworth.
I went to the North Korean border a few years ago... the northern one with China on a river. You can pay a few yuan for a chinese guy to take you in a motorboat over to the other side, got within about 5 metres of the shore until a NK guard points a gun at the boat and shouts something. It's all part of the tourist experience, everyone thinks they've come close to a diplomatic incident, but the chinese boat guys probably bung the NK guy a few quid to give tourists a thrill and a story of how they nearly ended up as an international incident. Wouldn't be surprised if it was a nice sanction busting little business for the iranians too.
captainflack is offline  
Old Jan 19th 2016, 10:31 am
  #26  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Location: bute
Posts: 9,740
scot47 has a reputation beyond reputescot47 has a reputation beyond reputescot47 has a reputation beyond reputescot47 has a reputation beyond reputescot47 has a reputation beyond reputescot47 has a reputation beyond reputescot47 has a reputation beyond reputescot47 has a reputation beyond reputescot47 has a reputation beyond reputescot47 has a reputation beyond reputescot47 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Iran

Nice to see that Netanyahu does not always get his own way.
scot47 is offline  
Old Jan 19th 2016, 10:38 am
  #27  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 0
scrubbedexpat141 scrubbedexpat141 scrubbedexpat141 scrubbedexpat141 scrubbedexpat141 scrubbedexpat141 scrubbedexpat141 scrubbedexpat141 scrubbedexpat141 scrubbedexpat141 scrubbedexpat141
Default Re: Iran

Originally Posted by captainflack
I went to the North Korean border a few years ago... the northern one with China on a river. You can pay a few yuan for a chinese guy to take you in a motorboat over to the other side, got within about 5 metres of the shore until a NK guard points a gun at the boat and shouts something. It's all part of the tourist experience, everyone thinks they've come close to a diplomatic incident, but the chinese boat guys probably bung the NK guy a few quid to give tourists a thrill and a story of how they nearly ended up as an international incident. Wouldn't be surprised if it was a nice sanction busting little business for the iranians too.
That sounds awesome.
scrubbedexpat141 is offline  
Old Jan 19th 2016, 11:19 am
  #28  
Just Joined
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 3
Brown Dawn is an unknown quantity at this point
Thumbs up Re: Iran

Originally Posted by captainflack
Iran sanctions are being lifted primarily because the US has clearly made a huge strategic shift. It's quite clear that it does not view Iran as a threat to either itself or to US interests now. After sic a shift, I think it very unlikely that the Iranians will be tricked or provoked into doing anything that is going to significantly change this. Some people suggested that the US Navy sailors straying into Iranian waters was a deliberate attempt by some in the military to mess up the improving relations but that's probably unlikely, and besides, the Iranians were swift to release the sailors which probably only improved relations further.

Considering the level of Saudi and Israeli opposition to Iran, it's also clear that the US appears happy now to disregard both of them. Saudi has a lot less sway because of the oil market these days, and maybe the US now......
Myself and an American mate had similar analysis in 2013-14 when this started but it has taken longer to get to this stage. IMHO because the country is an 'old civilisation' and highly educated, things will progress for them. At least one hopes so. BTW are there job opportunities there now? I only have KSA and small African experience as an expat.
Brown Dawn is offline  
Old Jan 19th 2016, 11:26 am
  #29  
Just Joined
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 3
Brown Dawn is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Iran

Originally Posted by Millhouse
Sanctions lifted.

Who's going next week? (not me)

Personally, I think it won't deliver as we'd hope. The country will be constrained by its neighbours and decision making will be slow. A lack of integration, socialist thinking and a difficult language will make the whole thing tricky.

I also think that sanctions will be back on pretty soon as Saudi will coax it into making a mistake. Whatever project you sign up for, it better be highly paid and short.
I would.
Go next week, that is.
When you are deeply invested in work, and being out of contract a few weeks, it is very appealing. Also since reading Fitzgerald's translation of Khayyam, forty odd years ago as a teenager, I have been fascinated with the place.
BD
Brown Dawn is offline  
Old Jan 19th 2016, 12:23 pm
  #30  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Thread Starter
 
Millhouse's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Location: Disneyland, Dubai
Posts: 15,887
Millhouse has a reputation beyond reputeMillhouse has a reputation beyond reputeMillhouse has a reputation beyond reputeMillhouse has a reputation beyond reputeMillhouse has a reputation beyond reputeMillhouse has a reputation beyond reputeMillhouse has a reputation beyond reputeMillhouse has a reputation beyond reputeMillhouse has a reputation beyond reputeMillhouse has a reputation beyond reputeMillhouse has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Iran

Originally Posted by Brown Dawn
I would.
Go next week, that is.
When you are deeply invested in work, and being out of contract a few weeks, it is very appealing. Also since reading Fitzgerald's translation of Khayyam, forty odd years ago as a teenager, I have been fascinated with the place.
BD
I'd love to go. Sadly, I no longer cover that region or I'd be there like a shot.

I'm now thinking about it more on a personal basis.
Millhouse is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.