British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   The Sand Pit (https://britishexpats.com/forum/sand-pit-116/)
-   -   I never expected this verdict. (https://britishexpats.com/forum/sand-pit-116/i-never-expected-verdict-732179/)

NorthernLad Sep 13th 2011 11:44 am

I never expected this verdict.
 
http://www.arabianbusiness.com/uk-do...se-420191.html

Spugsy Sep 13th 2011 12:38 pm

Re: I never expected this verdict.
 

Originally Posted by NorthernLad (Post 9617979)

yep it was a stitch up, sounds very much to me like the UK Government stepped in here to sort it out.

Also the guy who was tail gating him had his kid on his knee, surely he should be arrested?

Umbrella Sep 13th 2011 12:46 pm

Re: I never expected this verdict.
 
Emirates 24/7 had a briefer, more nuanced view of the verdict. The title alone...

http://www.emirates247.com/news/emir...09-13-1.418239

Whoa... wait. They changed the title since this morning. Earlier it was something very close to 'Bird-flipping-Brit-doctor-acquitted.' Maybe they heard from a few readers?

U.

Millhouse Sep 13th 2011 5:08 pm

Re: I never expected this verdict.
 

Originally Posted by Spugsy (Post 9618070)
UK Government stepped in here to sort it out.

Why would they do that?

alfrombarking Sep 14th 2011 2:08 am

Re: I never expected this verdict.
 

Originally Posted by Millhouse (Post 9618656)
Why would they do that?

Coz intervention is our trait

Spugsy Sep 14th 2011 5:29 am

Re: I never expected this verdict.
 

Originally Posted by Millhouse (Post 9618656)
Why would they do that?

Because he's a very important and high level surgeon.

Millhouse Sep 14th 2011 6:47 am

Re: I never expected this verdict.
 

Originally Posted by Spugsy (Post 9619875)
Because he's a very important and high level surgeon.

I still don't see it - he is just a surgeon. He isn't a diplomat and he was in the safety of the UK already.

They didn't help out the UN guy last year who was on official business who did exactly the same thing.

OleJanx Sep 14th 2011 7:30 am

Re: I never expected this verdict.
 

Originally Posted by Millhouse (Post 9619977)
I still don't see it - he is just a surgeon. He isn't a diplomat and he was in the safety of the UK already.

They didn't help out the UN guy last year who was on official business who did exactly the same thing.

You're forgetting what this guy's specialisation was....
Given their propensity to talking out of their arses, you can understand why British politicians helped him out a bit!:D

al dente Sep 14th 2011 9:11 am

Re: I never expected this verdict.
 

Originally Posted by Millhouse (Post 9619977)
I still don't see it - he is just a surgeon. He isn't a diplomat and he was in the safety of the UK already.

They didn't help out the UN guy last year who was on official business who did exactly the same thing.

I thought more that he was protected by people here. Who knows whose life he has saved? Surgeons can be very popular.. The guy who reported him may have had less wasta. Also, was he with the Cleveland Clinic? There could be business interests that were affected too, namely by a lowranking cop who tried to bully a 'black' man who got in his way.

i like the verdict.

NorthernLad Sep 14th 2011 9:19 am

Re: I never expected this verdict.
 

Originally Posted by Millhouse (Post 9619977)
I still don't see it - he is just a surgeon. He isn't a diplomat and he was in the safety of the UK already.

They didn't help out the UN guy last year who was on official business who did exactly the same thing.

Isn't his dad some sort of diplomat in Ghana?

Roadking Sep 14th 2011 10:59 am

Re: I never expected this verdict.
 

Originally Posted by NorthernLad (Post 9620195)
Isn't his dad some sort of diplomat in Ghana?

Yep, his dad was a guvrnment minster and he has 200 million dollars to pay to someone...

seven seas Sep 14th 2011 11:50 am

Re: I never expected this verdict.
 
Maybe it's just that nobody could prove the accusation, so he was let off. AS very good precedent for this kind of 'case'.


Is there actually a case where the accusation was proved, and the guy found guilty?

al dente Sep 14th 2011 1:18 pm

Re: I never expected this verdict.
 

Originally Posted by seven seas (Post 9620406)
Maybe it's just that nobody could prove the accusation, so he was let off. AS very good precedent for this kind of 'case'.


Is there actually a case where the accusation was proved, and the guy found guilty?

Shariah law does not believe in precendents. Each case stands alone.

seven seas Sep 14th 2011 2:05 pm

Re: I never expected this verdict.
 
What's sharia got to do with it? FYI we aren't in a sharia-law country.

Is there actually a case where the accusation was proved, and the guy found guilty? Or are we just worried over nothing?

auzdafluff Sep 14th 2011 3:13 pm

Re: I never expected this verdict.
 

Originally Posted by seven seas (Post 9620668)
What's sharia got to do with it? FYI we aren't in a sharia-law country.

Is there actually a case where the accusation was proved, and the guy found guilty? Or are we just worried over nothing?

Seven Seas is right. We live in a country whose laws are 'guided' by Sharia law, but we don't live under Sharia law. Two very different things, thankfully.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:22 am.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.