Having it all?
#1
Having it all?
Hi all,
Whilst travelling with my muslim indian colleague we had some very interesting chats as you do. Just to paint the picture she is a strict muslim indian married with one kid in her mid 30's, whereas I'm a single english atheist in my nearly early 30's.
So one of the conversations we had started when talking about Angelina Jolie, she happened to say she thought she was a home wrecker, to which I said I thought that was a bit harsh and that any western relationship has other pressures and there is not the obligation to stay together that perhaps a traditional indian girl would feel, then she went into a bit of a rant about how Ange tempted Brad away etc etc. ( at this point I decided to hold back on some of my exploits) anyway the converstaion went on to why I'm single (I get this on a regular basis here from my Indian counterparts as it would seem I am some sort of freak to be at my age and never married). So her advice to me (not that I was asking for any) was that I need to stop putting myself and my career first as you really can't have it all. Which I do agree with to some level, but when I explained I would choose my career first she kind of lost all hope with me.
So I was just wondering who agrees, can women have it all- the job, the husband, the kids etc or can you only ever have one or two of those things and be good and happy at/with them? She felt to keep her husband she must always put him first and do whatever he wants even if she doesn't want to ( including bedroom duties), and I agree if a guys not getting it at home he will develop a wondering eye but is it really as black and white as that- a guy gets what he wants or he leaves/strays? So for a successful relationship her view is that she must make all the compromises and she gets her happiness from him being happy? Obviously, very different cultures but it did make me wonder if in the west we have moved away from traditional values at the cost of high divorce rates and general selfishness? Should we be returning to 1950's england where the women are home makers and servants to their men?
Any thoughts?
xxx
Whilst travelling with my muslim indian colleague we had some very interesting chats as you do. Just to paint the picture she is a strict muslim indian married with one kid in her mid 30's, whereas I'm a single english atheist in my nearly early 30's.
So one of the conversations we had started when talking about Angelina Jolie, she happened to say she thought she was a home wrecker, to which I said I thought that was a bit harsh and that any western relationship has other pressures and there is not the obligation to stay together that perhaps a traditional indian girl would feel, then she went into a bit of a rant about how Ange tempted Brad away etc etc. ( at this point I decided to hold back on some of my exploits) anyway the converstaion went on to why I'm single (I get this on a regular basis here from my Indian counterparts as it would seem I am some sort of freak to be at my age and never married). So her advice to me (not that I was asking for any) was that I need to stop putting myself and my career first as you really can't have it all. Which I do agree with to some level, but when I explained I would choose my career first she kind of lost all hope with me.
So I was just wondering who agrees, can women have it all- the job, the husband, the kids etc or can you only ever have one or two of those things and be good and happy at/with them? She felt to keep her husband she must always put him first and do whatever he wants even if she doesn't want to ( including bedroom duties), and I agree if a guys not getting it at home he will develop a wondering eye but is it really as black and white as that- a guy gets what he wants or he leaves/strays? So for a successful relationship her view is that she must make all the compromises and she gets her happiness from him being happy? Obviously, very different cultures but it did make me wonder if in the west we have moved away from traditional values at the cost of high divorce rates and general selfishness? Should we be returning to 1950's england where the women are home makers and servants to their men?
Any thoughts?
xxx
#2
Re: Having it all?
Hi all,
Whilst travelling with my muslim indian colleague we had some very interesting chats as you do. Just to paint the picture she is a strict muslim indian married with one kid in her mid 30's, whereas I'm a single english atheist in my nearly early 30's.
So one of the conversations we had started when talking about Angelina Jolie, she happened to say she thought she was a home wrecker, to which I said I thought that was a bit harsh and that any western relationship has other pressures and there is not the obligation to stay together that perhaps a traditional indian girl would feel, then she went into a bit of a rant about how Ange tempted Brad away etc etc. ( at this point I decided to hold back on some of my exploits) anyway the converstaion went on to why I'm single (I get this on a regular basis here from my Indian counterparts as it would seem I am some sort of freak to be at my age and never married). So her advice to me (not that I was asking for any) was that I need to stop putting myself and my career first as you really can't have it all. Which I do agree with to some level, but when I explained I would choose my career first she kind of lost all hope with me.
So I was just wondering who agrees, can women have it all- the job, the husband, the kids etc or can you only ever have one or two of those things and be good and happy at/with them? She felt to keep her husband she must always put him first and do whatever he wants even if she doesn't want to ( including bedroom duties), and I agree if a guys not getting it at home he will develop a wondering eye but is it really as black and white as that- a guy gets what he wants or he leaves/strays? So for a successful relationship her view is that she must make all the compromises and she gets her happiness from him being happy? Obviously, very different cultures but it did make me wonder if in the west we have moved away from traditional values at the cost of high divorce rates and general selfishness? Should we be returning to 1950's england where the women are home makers and servants to their men?
Any thoughts?
xxx
Whilst travelling with my muslim indian colleague we had some very interesting chats as you do. Just to paint the picture she is a strict muslim indian married with one kid in her mid 30's, whereas I'm a single english atheist in my nearly early 30's.
So one of the conversations we had started when talking about Angelina Jolie, she happened to say she thought she was a home wrecker, to which I said I thought that was a bit harsh and that any western relationship has other pressures and there is not the obligation to stay together that perhaps a traditional indian girl would feel, then she went into a bit of a rant about how Ange tempted Brad away etc etc. ( at this point I decided to hold back on some of my exploits) anyway the converstaion went on to why I'm single (I get this on a regular basis here from my Indian counterparts as it would seem I am some sort of freak to be at my age and never married). So her advice to me (not that I was asking for any) was that I need to stop putting myself and my career first as you really can't have it all. Which I do agree with to some level, but when I explained I would choose my career first she kind of lost all hope with me.
So I was just wondering who agrees, can women have it all- the job, the husband, the kids etc or can you only ever have one or two of those things and be good and happy at/with them? She felt to keep her husband she must always put him first and do whatever he wants even if she doesn't want to ( including bedroom duties), and I agree if a guys not getting it at home he will develop a wondering eye but is it really as black and white as that- a guy gets what he wants or he leaves/strays? So for a successful relationship her view is that she must make all the compromises and she gets her happiness from him being happy? Obviously, very different cultures but it did make me wonder if in the west we have moved away from traditional values at the cost of high divorce rates and general selfishness? Should we be returning to 1950's england where the women are home makers and servants to their men?
Any thoughts?
xxx
#3
Re: Having it all?
I dunno Millhouse, I'm not sure just how fun she is, sounded a bit like lay back and think of England stuff only, no swinging from the chandeliers or anything, and when we spoke about oral sex I don't think I've seen anyone ever look so mortified! Part of my trip included shopping in sex stores (remember lingerie designer) and I was almost embarrassed having to explain what every single toy was for- I'm sure she now thinks I'm some sort of hussy! Ok, Ok, maybe I am but certainly got reminded at how open minded I am compared to some of the more innocent among us.
#4
Hit 16's
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Of all the gin joints, in all the towns, in all the world, she walks into mine
Posts: 13,112
Re: Having it all?
What's oral sex?
#5
Re: Having it all?
I dunno Millhouse, I'm not sure just how fun she is, sounded a bit like lay back and think of England stuff only, no swinging from the chandeliers or anything, and when we spoke about oral sex I don't think I've seen anyone ever look so mortified! Part of my trip included shopping in sex stores (remember lingerie designer) and I was almost embarrassed having to explain what every single toy was for- I'm sure she now thinks I'm some sort of hussy! Ok, Ok, maybe I am but certainly got reminded at how open minded I am compared to some of the more innocent among us.
Now to answer your question, can woman have it all... I'm afraid to say that in life we make compromises - some women call pull it off, most can't. Kids and Career is very tough.
#7
Hit 16's
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Of all the gin joints, in all the towns, in all the world, she walks into mine
Posts: 13,112
#15
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,869
Re: Having it all?
Men can't have their career, kids, hobbies, friends and wife.
We are not built for this monogamy thing, or maybe this model of society where we are expected to fulfill so many roles at once.
We are not built for this monogamy thing, or maybe this model of society where we are expected to fulfill so many roles at once.