First Syria and now Iraq
#17
Re: First Syria and now Iraq
Back in 2004 an Arab bloke in the office told me the Iraq invasion would be a disaster. ..the reason being that Arabs need a brutal leader to keep them in check. Horrific what Saddam used to do but it did keep control. It's a very emotive subject, but maybe some truth in it. Look at Syria, I suspect fat more have suffered and died in last few years than in the past decade.
#18
Joined on April fools day
Joined: Apr 2012
Location: 30 miles from a decent grocery store.
Posts: 10,642
Re: First Syria and now Iraq
Back in 2004 an Arab bloke in the office told me the Iraq invasion would be a disaster. ..the reason being that Arabs need a brutal leader to keep them in check. Horrific what Saddam used to do but it did keep control. It's a very emotive subject, but maybe some truth in it. Look at Syria, I suspect fat more have suffered and died in last few years than in the past decade.
Your friend was right.
Last edited by Beaverstate; Jun 15th 2014 at 10:23 am. Reason: doh
#19
Re: First Syria and now Iraq
Back in 2004 an Arab bloke in the office told me the Iraq invasion would be a disaster. ..the reason being that Arabs need a brutal leader to keep them in check. Horrific what Saddam used to do but it did keep control. It's a very emotive subject, but maybe some truth in it. Look at Syria, I suspect fat more have suffered and died in last few years than in the past decade.
#20
Re: First Syria and now Iraq
The need for a brutal leader is usually the case where you have so many factions with differing agendas. The same thing happened in Yugoslavia shortly after Tito died. Simmering resentments eventually boiled over, and Syria and Iraq are showing signs of repeating history....
Don't forget the amount of blood spilt in getting Europe to democracy.
#21
Account Closed
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 0
Re: First Syria and now Iraq
How have you come to this conclusion, by the way?
You could also say that the Iraqi army were under-resourced, under-trained, and poorly organised. A US/UK doing. Just sayin' you're not wrong, but I'm not totally sure that you are right either.
Anyway, Blair tells us it's not his fault. I believe him.
You could also say that the Iraqi army were under-resourced, under-trained, and poorly organised. A US/UK doing. Just sayin' you're not wrong, but I'm not totally sure that you are right either.
Anyway, Blair tells us it's not his fault. I believe him.
Of course you could, these kind of things are never down to one reason, it's always a combination of factors but the speed at which this has unfolded is quite spectacular.
Still, what do I know, I'm just another idiot on the internet pretending I know stuff.
#22
Re: First Syria and now Iraq
With the exception of the west, the vast majority of the world has done better under dictatorship vs. democracy. China's rise would not have happened under democracy, India will never rise and deliver on its potential as a consequence of "democracy". The Arabs certainly need a brutal dictator (or at least a rich benevolent one).
Don't forget the amount of blood spilt in getting Europe to democracy.
Don't forget the amount of blood spilt in getting Europe to democracy.
#23
Re: First Syria and now Iraq
The speed at which the baddies have taken control of a number of cities means logically, to me anyway, that they're quite well equipped both physically and tactically. To achieve the former you need cash and if they've been ploughing through banks, they definitely have that too. It appears their numbers will have swollen by gaining support in the areas they infiltrate.
Of course you could, these kind of things are never down to one reason, it's always a combination of factors but the speed at which this has unfolded is quite spectacular.
Still, what do I know, I'm just another idiot on the internet pretending I know stuff.
Of course you could, these kind of things are never down to one reason, it's always a combination of factors but the speed at which this has unfolded is quite spectacular.
Still, what do I know, I'm just another idiot on the internet pretending I know stuff.
My Iraqi man said it was not down to how good\well equipped they are, more to do with the discontent throughout the country with the current government. He says they want change and this seems to be the quickest way.
The drones will soon sort out ISIS.
#24
Joined on April fools day
Joined: Apr 2012
Location: 30 miles from a decent grocery store.
Posts: 10,642
#25
Joined on April fools day
Joined: Apr 2012
Location: 30 miles from a decent grocery store.
Posts: 10,642
Re: First Syria and now Iraq
Merely a token gesture as he has no stomach for it (see Syria etc...)
#27
Re: First Syria and now Iraq
People in 'The West' expect everywhere else to immediately conform to their standards. This place is still tribal and anyone ignoring that is a bloody idiot.
#28
Joined on April fools day
Joined: Apr 2012
Location: 30 miles from a decent grocery store.
Posts: 10,642
Re: First Syria and now Iraq
A good idea to begin with, but a proven non starter in most societies.
Perhaps the Mid East does need to redraw its maps along tribal or religious lines.
#29
Re: First Syria and now Iraq
This is one of the reasons the west prop up the Al Sauds. The alternative is every politicians nightmare. Iraq is one thing, but their oil has been off the western radar for decades, but the loss of Saudi oil? Loosing Kuwaiti oil for a few months in '90/'91 was bad enough...