Re: Films you just don't 'get'
Dances With Wolves. Three hours + of arse aching tedium. Waterworld was shit, too.
|
Re: Films you just don't 'get'
Originally Posted by OleJanx
(Post 10220860)
Dances With Wolves. Three hours + of arse aching tedium. Waterworld was shit, too.
Brilliant: Field of Dreams JFK 13 Days No Way Out Crap: Waterworld 3000 Miles to Graceland The Bodyguard Robin Hood (I quite liked Dances with Wolves but I can see why many wouldn't). |
Re: Films you just don't 'get'
The never ending franchise that is Alien - why do aliens have to be slimy?
|
Re: Films you just don't 'get'
Originally Posted by Theseus
(Post 10221860)
The never ending franchise that is Alien - why do aliens have to be slimy?
|
Re: Films you just don't 'get'
Originally Posted by Bahtatboy
(Post 10222065)
And unless I'm mistaken, it (and Spiderman, Batman etc) isn't a franchise.
|
Re: Films you just don't 'get'
Originally Posted by Bahtatboy
(Post 10222065)
And unless I'm mistaken, it (and Spiderman, Batman etc) isn't a franchise.
|
Re: Films you just don't 'get'
Originally Posted by Theseus
(Post 10222147)
Oops sorry - isn't that what they call it in film circles?
|
Re: Films you just don't 'get'
Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings Trilogy
Peter Jackson's remake of King Kong Why does Mr. Jackson insist on making everything twice as long as it should be? 3 hours for King Kong, come on. I believe he is going to make 3 films out of the hobbit (zzzzzz), which is a shame because its a good book. |
Re: Films you just don't 'get'
Originally Posted by Bahtatboy
(Post 10222579)
Yeah, they do (not having a pop at you). "Sequel" is now obviously old hat: must be a "franchise", sounds better :nod:
|
Re: Films you just don't 'get'
Debbie Does Dallas.....
I can never get past the first 20 minutes... |
Re: Films you just don't 'get'
Originally Posted by Millhouse
(Post 10222624)
I thought the term franchise was to signify the various rights that are sold off (via a franchise system) for the sales and distribution of the associated merchandise... e.g. the toys, t-shits, cups etc.
|
Re: Films you just don't 'get'
I actually thought about calling it a trilogy ans then thought there was probably more than three alien films and i don't like the word quadrilogy.
|
Re: Films you just don't 'get'
Originally Posted by The Dean
(Post 10222802)
By coincidence - having said I had never heard the term - someone on the radio referred to the 'Toy Story franchise' this morning. I assume it means a series of films that aren't actual sequels? Anyway - who cares..........?
Oh, and Toy Story 3 is a great film. You are not human if your eyes do not fill up in the closing scenes. |
Re: Films you just don't 'get'
Originally Posted by The Dean
(Post 10222802)
By coincidence - having said I had never heard the term - someone on the radio referred to the 'Toy Story franchise' this morning. I assume it means a series of films that aren't actual sequels? Anyway - who cares..........?
|
Re: Films you just don't 'get'
Originally Posted by Theseus
(Post 10223123)
I actually thought about calling it a trilogy ans then thought there was probably more than three alien films and i don't like the word quadrilogy.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:04 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.