Definitely not pork - or is it?
#2
You read these things?
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,261
Re: Definitely not pork - or is it?
#3
Hit 16's
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Of all the gin joints, in all the towns, in all the world, she walks into mine
Posts: 13,112
Re: Definitely not pork - or is it?
#4
You read these things?
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,261
Re: Definitely not pork - or is it?
Does that mean rational, sane adults should be deprived? No.
#5
Joined on April fools day
Joined: Apr 2012
Location: 30 miles from a decent grocery store.
Posts: 10,642
Re: Definitely not pork - or is it?
I'm not defending their actions, but they sound like sadistic little ****s, with or without playing the game. Anything could provide inspiration to their sick little minds – could have been a film, a tv show, a video game, or even a story they read.
Does that mean rational, sane adults should be deprived? No.
Does that mean rational, sane adults should be deprived? No.
#6
Hit 16's
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Of all the gin joints, in all the towns, in all the world, she walks into mine
Posts: 13,112
Re: Definitely not pork - or is it?
I'm not defending their actions, but they sound like sadistic little ****s, with or without playing the game. Anything could provide inspiration to their sick little minds – could have been a film, a tv show, a video game, or even a story they read.
Does that mean rational, sane adults should be deprived? No.
Does that mean rational, sane adults should be deprived? No.
#7
Joined on April fools day
Joined: Apr 2012
Location: 30 miles from a decent grocery store.
Posts: 10,642
Re: Definitely not pork - or is it?
Yeah, basically I agree with you. Not seen or played the game in question. In principle I'm against censorship, but perhaps that's based on a view from my youth when really poisonous stuff was neither really that bad nor as pervasive or easily-accessible as it is today. Should media which have no socially-redeeming attributes and may be seen by many to be glorifying violence be allowed? From an abstract viewpoint, yes (freedom of choice to make, freedom of choice to view/use), but from a societal viewpoint the thought process needs to be different.
#8
You read these things?
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,261
Re: Definitely not pork - or is it?
And you're right Bahtatboy. It does have a age restriction and I'm hugely for them.
#9
Re: Definitely not pork - or is it?
Should media which have no socially-redeeming attributes and may be seen by many to be glorifying violence be allowed? From an abstract viewpoint, yes (freedom of choice to make, freedom of choice to view/use), but from a societal viewpoint the thought process needs to be different.
I recall having a similar debate about banning violent video games with an older lady who clearly wasn't a games player. In her case it was GTA IV she objected to. But why stop at video games? Got to do movies too. But then what about books?
I can think of a couple of pretty old books that contain incitement to commit murder, genocide, descriptions of executions and so on. I recall one particularly nasty incident in which the main protagonist is nailed up to a cross until he dies.
I am pretty sure over the past 2000 years there have been more violent evil acts by people influenced by *that* book, or others from the same author than by video games
#10
Hit 16's
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Of all the gin joints, in all the towns, in all the world, she walks into mine
Posts: 13,112
Re: Definitely not pork - or is it?
But unfortunately that damages a great deal of your argument. Otherwise sane people believe what's written in it and go and murder people.