Carillion
#16
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 0
Re: Carillion
Export finance was definitely involved, then it definitely wasn't. Then maybe. No idea what happened in the end.
#17
Re: Carillion
What a mess, hopefully no-one on here is directly affected by it or at least had the good sense to bail out a few months ago when the writing was on the wall.
Guessing on an Arabtec, CCC and partner(s) JV to come in and take over the works? Good but risky opportunity for anyone considering stepping into the breach.
Guessing on an Arabtec, CCC and partner(s) JV to come in and take over the works? Good but risky opportunity for anyone considering stepping into the breach.
#18
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 0
Re: Carillion
What a mess, hopefully no-one on here is directly affected by it or at least had the good sense to bail out a few months ago when the writing was on the wall.
Guessing on an Arabtec, CCC and partner(s) JV to come in and take over the works? Good but risky opportunity for anyone considering stepping into the breach.
Guessing on an Arabtec, CCC and partner(s) JV to come in and take over the works? Good but risky opportunity for anyone considering stepping into the breach.
#19
Re: Carillion
What a mess, hopefully no-one on here is directly affected by it or at least had the good sense to bail out a few months ago when the writing was on the wall.
Guessing on an Arabtec, CCC and partner(s) JV to come in and take over the works? Good but risky opportunity for anyone considering stepping into the breach.
Guessing on an Arabtec, CCC and partner(s) JV to come in and take over the works? Good but risky opportunity for anyone considering stepping into the breach.
Someone with deep pockets and a decent line of credit and a touch of influence
#20
Re: Carillion
And why shouldn't they? They're just representing their members.20,000 of them directly and how many more indirectly.
I actually thought Bernard Jenkin's comment was more to the point. That part about public service and not just enriching the shareholders.
From a Tory too...
I actually thought Bernard Jenkin's comment was more to the point. That part about public service and not just enriching the shareholders.
From a Tory too...
#23
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 0
Re: Carillion
And why shouldn't they? They're just representing their members.20,000 of them directly and how many more indirectly.
I actually thought Bernard Jenkin's comment was more to the point. That part about public service and not just enriching the shareholders.
From a Tory too...
I actually thought Bernard Jenkin's comment was more to the point. That part about public service and not just enriching the shareholders.
From a Tory too...
#30
Re: Carillion
Some of there work has already been re awarded , seen enquiries today for packages which were AFC .
Didn't take them long
Didn't take them long